IP Infusion participates in industry testing; proves OcNOS™ interoperability with all major vendors
IP Infusion is one of the industry’s top networking vendors who have joined EANTC (European Advanced Networking Test Center) to announce progress in the interoperability of advanced segment routing, Ethernet VPNs, clock synchronization and microwave topics at a live showcase at the MPLS + SDN + NFV World Congress in Paris. EANTC AG published a white paper with more than 120 successful and reproducible set-ups that depict latest results of the renowned multi-vendor test series. IP Infusion participated in extensive tests at EANTC’s lab in Berlin, Germany.
Download the interoperability report here: http://www.eantc.de/fileadmin/eantc/downloads/events/2017-2020/MPLS2018/EANTC-MPLSSDNNFV2018-WhitePaper-final.pdf
Internet of things (IoT) has some big issues. Interoperability is one. And potential vendor lock-in and data silos are another.
But I do not buy that blockchain is the solution to those problems.
I have heard so many times the idea of combining blockchain and IoT, but I do not get it. IoT will be producing potentially much more data that anything we had before, and a lot of that data will be privacy sensitive. How can a public and decentralized technology with scaling issues help here?
It is true that data on a blockchain is public and interoperability seems easier if everyone agrees on one blockchain. But those properties are not the fundamental properties of a blockchain. Any common technology, if parties agree to use it, improves interoperability. But nobody assures that data stored on a blockchain would be in open standard. And what when people will encrypt data stored on a blockchain to address the privacy concerns with IoT data? How does this prevent data silos?
There are many other ways to address issues of interoperability and data access. One I like is that gateways for IoT should not be black boxes but something end-users can control. You can control your home Internet router, and you should be able to control your home IoT router. If you can do that, you can prevent data silos and you can assure interoperability with those you want. Furthermore, we could enforce it through regulation (require open standards for IoT), instead of trying to get IoT companies to adopt a new technology which is not even yet ready for this use case. Why would those companies do that?
The issues here are to me easier solved through regulation than through technology. And if we want a technological solution, then open IoT gateways are a better approach. What we need is a net neutrality movement for IoT and not a blockchain.
