#patentinvalidity

[ingeniousebrain]

Invalidity Search

Invalidity search: Identify prior art to challenge patent validity. Assess relevance, provide opinion, & support legal proceedings if needed

[ingeniousebrain]

Invalidity Search

Invalidity search: Identify prior art to challenge patent validity. Assess relevance, provide opinion, & support legal proceedings if needed

[ingeniousebrain]

Ingenious Patent Invalidity Search Services

The detailed and comprehensive Invalidity search report enables clients for highly sensitive litigation, opposition, and patent acquisition cases where a high-definition claim chart is required to ease the attorney’s efforts. Before going for any invalidity search, we analyze the subject patent case in-depth using litigation/ opposition documents (if any), file wrapper, etc., to build a sound understanding of the case. We categorize the identified references into three categories “X”, “Y”, and “A”, as per the international search report (ISR). 

“X” Category: Novelty or Inventiveness in one reference.  

“Y” Category: If novelty or inventiveness is lacking in one document; two or more references are identified to generate a claim chart.   

“A” category: This category references background art that neither discloses any novelty nor inventiveness.  

IeB’s Invalidity search report is enabled with a feature matrix generated for each feature. This enables attorneys to have a quick walk-through of fully supported, partially supported, inferentially supported, and non-supported features. Below are the strategies applied for an exhaustive Invalidity search. 

Why is Patent Invalidation Study Imperative? 

To invalidate the claims of a patent through a prior art search. 

To check the potency of a granted patent. 

To assess the validity of an established patent. 

Why Ingenious for Invalidation Search? 

We employ robust analytical tools to perform an exhaustive patent search. 

We have access to paid non-patent databases, such as IEEE, Scopus, web of science, etc. 

We include all the relevant references that target innovation and non-obviousness. 

Class translation to Japanese and Korean. 

We offer multiple native language search options for our global clients. 

Standard search on 3GPP & IEEE portal. 

We provide both novelty and inventiveness-based search strategies to kill an art. 

We offer flexible pricing options to meet client budgets without compromising quality results. 

We follow KSR seven rationales to determine the obviousness. 

Proven records with fortune 500 companies with success stories. 

High-definition color-coded claim charts to reduce attorney efforts in review. 

About Ingenious e-Brain : – 

Ingenious e-Brain provides high-quality, customized, and cost-effective Technology Research, Business Research, and Intellectual Property Research solutions to industry leaders, and innovative companies across the globe. Innovation, knowledge, and transparency form the basis of our company’s mission and vision. Along with cost benefits, we provide highest quality results ensuring fool-proof confidentiality and security. We are an ISO certified company with offices in India and USA. 

Ingenious e-Brain has a strong team of analysts, and subject matter experts with domain proficiency which is devoted to help clients grow. Our highly qualified professionals offer tailored, value-added and cost-effective services to our clients. We believe in building long term relationships with our clients who include national and international corporations, Fortune 500 companies, world’s leading research institutes and universities as well as independent inventors. 

Get in Touch: – 

USA Office: 

646 Sutton Way#1006  Grass Valley, CA 95945 United States  [phone] 

India Office  207-208 Welldone TechPark, Sohna Road  Sector 48, Gurugram, Haryana 122018, India  [phone] 

Email: [email protected] 

[ipandlegalfilings]

Using earlier IP for invalidity?

In one of the interesting cases, the European Court of Justice Rules on a pertinent question of an assertion of a mark in an invalidity proceeding, which expires within that proceedings. Read more: https://bit.ly/3pZyfLt

[globalpatentfilings]

The indefiniteness ambit: Horizon vs. Dr. Reddy’s

The latest case of Horizon vs. Dr. Reddy’s where the Federal Circuit delves upon the indefiniteness ambit thereby, invalidating the patent, is a classic example of drafting specification with utmost precision. The case delves around the word ‘target’ being used by the applicant in the claim making it under the zone of uncertainty. Read more: http://bit.ly/3pwNqsM