‘Despite my mixed feelings on how well the Perdita stuff was integrated into the story, I actually think MAH is better when we don't get to find out what happened to her. The reason MC tried to solve Gabbie's case is because they didn't want it to get the same treatment as Perdita's case. So the two kind of juxtapose each other, where Gabbie's case gets closure but Perdita's case does not. And I think that makes it a lot more nuanced because sometimes we don't always get closure for what happened to missing loved ones. Now I think MAH could use a sequel that's actually about Perdita's disappearance, but I wouldn't want it to reveal what really happened to her because that would just be a major disservice to that nuance. Rather, MC and friends try to solve the case, only to pretty much fail at getting closure. And then you get an ending where you choose what MC does going forward: Will they continue searching anyways in the hopes of eventually figuring it out, or will they let the case go and move on?’