#PhillipsCurve #NewYorkCity #Manhattan #UnionSquare #GreenMarket #Sunflowers #HelianthusAnnuus #BriceDailyPhoto https://www.instagram.com/p/B1PhkXkBvyp/?igshid=ldnzfiii4mny

seen from Italy
seen from Russia

seen from France

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Sweden

seen from Australia
seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Georgia
seen from China
seen from United States
#PhillipsCurve #NewYorkCity #Manhattan #UnionSquare #GreenMarket #Sunflowers #HelianthusAnnuus #BriceDailyPhoto https://www.instagram.com/p/B1PhkXkBvyp/?igshid=ldnzfiii4mny
U-3 vs. NGDP Phillips Curve
If one plots Nominal Gross Domestic Product (NGDP) over time on a quarterly basis between January 1949 and July 2017 and U-3 unemployment rate over the same period the plot reveals not clear pattern [1]. However if the data is plotted on a Year Over Year Percent Change basis an inverse relationship is strongly suggested [2]. In this period (275 quarters) the median YOYPC for U-3 -5.1% (25th Percentile =-11.3 %, 75th Percentile = 7.3 %) and the median YOYPC for NGDP was 6.3% (25th Percentile = 4.3 %, 75th Percentile = 8.3 %). The Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC) coefficient of correlation (R2) is -0.59 (p<0.00001). That would suggest a very strong basis for your curve (The Spearman Rank Correlation R2 = -0.4 p < 0.00001). However rather than a second order curve, it appears to be a first order curve. The correlation is actually stronger if only the last 20 years of data is used Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC) coefficient of correlation (R2) is -0.76 (p<0.00001 n = 81) [3].