seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
prussanic-miscellanea replied to your post “Reputation: Will fight anyone over science, lesbians, bigotry, space...”
I do adore the puns, this is true. In fact, of late, it's been the puns and jokes which cause the shit storms. I think it's great (but also slightly disappointing that people are dicks)
haha yeah...the most controversial post I’ve ever made (in terms of notes vs. total hate it generated) was a gay joke so, you know, there’s that
Reputation: Will fight anyone over science, lesbians, bigotry, space (pluto/moon), dinosaurs, and rock licking geologists. My first thoughts upon seeing your URL: "What shit storm has AdventuresinChem brought down upon us today?" *Leans back in chair and watches chaos unfold*
I mean, you’re not wrong
and I’d like to think that 80% of the time I’m bring puns and amusing jokes so there’s that
prussanic-miscellanea replied to your post “psych is definitely hufflepuff tho--looked down on by the other fields...”
Is it just me, or does anyone else ever find themselves thinking that maybe the natural/social science distinction is just kind of a little bit bullshit? Like, I get the reasoning, and on the surface it works well, but... IDK. It just kinda feels a little artificial and unnecessary. Not that it has any bearing on this shitstorm. Just thinking aloud.
Much like sorting 11 year olds into advisarial groups based on vague personality traits and then debating it online, the natural/social science distinction is very much bullshit
prussanic-miscellanea replied to your post “hey, your blog is super great and you seem like a beautiful human...”
Dude, holy shit, how is it that are you so good at saying things in jest, that end up getting you attacked by randoms on the internet?
because apparently it’s my job to be an 100% sincere shining example for everyone always. And some people literally just can’t accept humor as like, a fun and good thing I guess.
Somehow I misread *to the tune of Here Comes The General* as *to the tune of Here Comes The Sun* and then I got very confused. "WTF? I like the sass, but homophobe has two too many syllables for that to work. whAT HAVE I MISSED HERE?" *rereads* "Oh- OHHHH. Nevermind."
Hahaha, that would certainly be an interesting contrast in tone
prussanic-miscellanea replied to your post:I am fairly sure that you could write the worst...
MOLDOVA’S EPIC SAX GUY.
TALK SAXY TO ME.
prussanic-miscellanea replied to your post: anonymous asked:Who is your oldes...
*insert .gif of Natasha Romanoff saying “Can any of you boys direct me to the Smithsonian? I’m here to pick up a fossil”*
PRUSSAN.
Marc I'm not even sorry-that joke is staying. You're that old you should be a freakin' fossil.
prussanic-miscellanea replied to your photo “Have an it’s Friday night and I’m workings on my Enterprise cosplay...”
Your hair looks good slicked back, it makes your face look really open & friendly. (I'm sorry if me saying that is weird. Please ignore me.)
Thanks! I don't generally wear my hair back because I have a fairly high hairline, and so it highlights my v. large forehead (or as my family calls it, my fivehead). That, and I don't really like the feel of product in my hair, so there's that.
