gurguliare replied to your post: crocordile replied to your post: ...
‘veiled soon-to-be-ex-catholic hysteria’ is SUCH a LOOK
Real talk: practical theodicy is the most ... fascinating thing in a world where the metaphysical questions about souls and afterlives and whether or not god and angels etc exist and what they are like, 90% directly answerable. The faith aspect is pushed like, waaaaaaay back to this tiny sliver of content covering ‘why does it happen THIS way for US and THIS way for YOU’ and ‘but what about the far future tho’ and ‘okay but like, OUTSIDE the universe there’s...?’ and things, because most of the rest of it is just, confirmed in-universe fact! Cut out the middleman, just expose the important non-semantics! it’s really great. also: “And for that reason I said that if your tale is true, then all in Arda is vain, from the pinnacle of Oiolossë to the uttermost abyss.”
Finrod.... :((((((
also andie sorry for clarifying at your clarifications endlessly but don’t acknowledge this apology or we’ll never escape
I’M SORRY about clarifying your clarif-- okay no
linguisticparadox replied to your post: gurguliare replied to your post: ...
I was gonna be mad until you amended it to “beloved twit” bc I love Finrod with all my heart and soul
sjhdfbsd YES an important distinction (finrod = literally my favorite silm elf...technically I sooooort of sliiiiightly love galadriel and elrond more, but only in lotr not in the silm, i don’t really consider them silm characters, and silm and lotr characters are apples to oranges for me)
actualmermaid replied to your post: crocordile replied to your post: ...
I am so much of a Feanorian fan that I went and had their symbol tattooed on my body but in what universe are they textual underdogs, like. really. they have the best stuff in the book but making them 100% sympathetic and always justified in everything they do robs them of most of what makes them compelling in the first place
It’s like, the Godfather if the Corleones really were a respectable olive oil business or smth. idk. that’s a dumb example. but just yeah, 100% this.
kareenvorbarra replied to your post: crocordile replied to your post: ...
“the narrative is biased against the feanorians” discourse is still one of the most puzzling things i’ve ever seen in this fandom
I just have to sit down and chinhands sometimes. Like. Do you know the sheer number of characters I would kill to have half as much juicy in-text character-clarification and focus and description and nuance and dialogue and filled-in timeline details as the Feanorians....(I mean, I GUESS Finrod technically gets several times more dialogue than any other Finwean except maybe Galadriel (in lotr), but still...? that’s, a philosophy debate? whereas the whole narrative is focused around the Feanorians’ tragedy - yes, all about tragic flaws and self-destructiveness etc of course, but it’s still written/presented as MUCH more similar to...Turin rather than Sauron, for example)
psychopompious replied to your post: actualmermaid replied to your post: …
also seeing as I adore the Arafinwions, maybe I’ve finally found the answer to why I can’t write any of the Feanorions to save my life (with the lone exception of Celegorm, but does he really count)
djhfsjf you know Celegorm IS kind of a weird standout one isn’t he? I wonder what it is about him…I was always very taken with his hippie animal-talking Orome fanboying nature guy aesthetic + psycho murderer who just like stands up and yells about shit to rile people up and just grabs ppl he thinks are hot bc he wants them and like, yells curses at his horse and dog when they don’t obey him like idk he’s fantastic man, and v different from most evil tolkien characters….tolkien is really into the sneaking/scheming sweet-voiced hidden villainy thing and Celegorm is, so not that









