#pwp nick

[mileniyum]

What is his problem

[localcomputer-quotes]

With the OP rules book in my hand i can make a big amount of sins.,.,,, ANYWAY Nick if he was in OP lalalalaa

His sheet and stuff below

Btw hes a specialist with the "Operário" origin

[mileniyum]

I can't believe I spent 9 hours on dat shi

[raymansexbomb5000]

the three baas

Close ups under cut

The Nicholson

The Johnson

and The Jazmin

[raymansexbomb5000]

From Forlorn video again

So it seems that john found out that Pal tried to kill Nick. I suggest that he either inferenced it or nick fessed up

[raymansexbomb5000]

also scott dawko interview day too but my mind decided this was more important yesterday

do not ask me how i felt making this

[raymansexbomb5000]

(sorry for bad quality) Maybe it's just me overthinking again but the dialogue in the ending feels like Nick's feelings and experiences aren't resolved yet ... but he tries to move on anyway. He shows extreme worry and doubt when he lies about the pal percy toy not trying to kill him, seemingly trying to reassure John ... but also himself in a way. And when John tells him to catch up to get something to eat, he stutters a bit before joining him, still appearing to have something on his mind, but then choosing to brush it off

Is it really that important? Pal is just left in the rubble by himself, with almost no likelyhood of escaping and/or hurting someone else. The only one who even knows of him is Nick. Plus the toys were already recalled, with Nick not even knowing about it until John tells him at the end. Even if he told his story, would anyone believe him? John acted confused at his ramblings and simply put his concerns to the side as the story seems very unlikely. He even said that the Pal Percy's don't spawn big living wires everywhere, and he knew about how dangerous they were, so why would an outsider believe otherwise?

It doesn't matter. He's alive, so might as well that nothing happened. Nothing happened.

[raymansexbomb5000]

okay so here's the thing

at the end of the game john basically doesn't seem to know that nick was using the pal percy throughout the nights, nor that there were even any left at all

but in the tutorial we see this sentence, notably in first person

And we know that john almost certainly gave (or tried to give) some guidance to nick when he reached the building

AND WE CAN'T USE THE LOGIC OF "MAYBE JOHN ISN'T ABLE TO CALL NICK IN THE BUILDING" BECAUSE HE DOES SO WHILE NICK IS REPAIRING PERCY

if we exclude the possibility of continuity errors (my hyperfixation is) that leaves three options, at least in my eyes

The instructor in the intro tutorial is a different person than John. Maybe just some random guide like likely with the other tutorials ,with no canon relevancy

The intro tutorial was what Nick thought John instructed him to do, perhaps taking a somewhat inaccurate inference of what to do, possibly like the other tutorials

John gaslighted him

If there's anything you'd like to add, then add it