#radblr hypocrisy

[sharp-rosee]

Lorynna just called seperatists as women who haven't been picked. Hetties have been doing this for a long time. Left radblr for this and multiple reasons

Had to look her up lmao but it seems to be very reactionary takes on both her end and the other women calling hets "cock worshippers".

I wish women wouldn't take those comments seriously bc to me it's an obvious attempt at baiting radfems to start discourse. The radfems who fall for it make it into a huge issue to where they start to think that separatism is this anti-hetero movement. It's legit a psyop to make separatism appear to be awful for straight women when it's just about living away from men. If it's not for you, it's not for you. These spaces should still exist though and why wouldn't you want to try and create it, even if you wouldn't participate?

They end up going through a factory reset to the normal Not All Men rhetoric before they derail and end up ditching radical feminism all together or doing a 180 and becoming a "pro life radfem" like msrevivedfrogs (or whatever her URL is.)

And referencing her post directly, saying saying a woman's mean words equates to the very dangerous incel ideology is just straight-up antifeminist too, so in the end she is being just as misogynistic as these trolls.

[sharp-rosee]

Hey funny story: I haven't been around Tumblr at all for months, but today someone told me menalez had deactivated or something so I came on here and looked it up. First result was a post by you, i checked out your blog and wouldn't you know it your most recent post had you defending me post mortem lmfao. I sent an anon to the other woman too but it seems she won't post it so to clarify to you: when I supposedly said "studies showing violence suffered by bisexuals are cringe and useless" what I remember thinking about that is that those studies that I've seen are never used to try to understand why bisexuals suffer such insane rates of violence (more than homosexuals) and trying to stop it. I've only seen them be used as battering rams in discourse when homosexuals criticize bisexuals. Which is crazy for such a serious issue and totally trivializes it lol. Also that my explanation for it was that such studies show that many abused people incorrectly id as bi for a time. You can disagree or wtv just those were my points, she made it sound like I'm cheering on women beating if they're bi or something. Also your defense of me (thanks queen lol) is accurate if you were wondering. I used to be sorta pro strict separatism but I outgrew the anger/ denial phase of "most women will partner with men" and reached acceptance. Most people are built for romantic partnership, that's just human nature, I can't be hating het women just because their lot in life in that means they're more likely to be abused. Just because I'm not drawn to men, or even much to romance, doesn't mean I should act like that's everyone else too and judge them on that standard, I accept reality and want women to be safe within that rather than pointlessly hate on them and get all worked up because some women have boyfriends..

Well I'm also a mean asshole, I'm sure you noticed, and I definitely would give the bi girlies on radblr a hard time here at the time lol. I don't have the "one side" sort of takes on this divide on radblr. It was funny but I can't feel the energy to that anymore since leaving tumblr, way too few bis or gays irl to care about that stuff. But at the end of the day these are my actual takes on all that disk horse. Funny to see it immediately on such a causal stroll around here lol

-sleep3r4gent

QUEEN I used to follow you ♡ at least when I was crypto a few years back I did.

Also, I'm glad you clarified because the way some women on here seem to hallucinate things they read almost makes me feel insane as well. Like you sending an ask saying you never thought of a certain perspective is not indicative of you agreeing and obviously one can change their opinions over time.

I really have no opinion either way tbh, I myself am straight and in a relationship, and have had others on my last blog send some anons calling me a "dick worshipper" and other misogynistic BS, but they stopped once I didn't let it bother me much. It's so obviously a group of trolls that it's embarrassing that they still believe it enough to keep bringing back the same users, some like you who aren't even misogynistic, to further their persecution complex.

It even is more annoying because these are the women who made Mena/Moideater leave, the above drama is a big reason why. The way radblr will still reblog posts from very racist blogs and not bat an eye but then freak out over a clique of women who aren't even radfems really does show what demographic makes up this site.

I know it gets exhausting to be involved in arguments, but it's nice to know you're still somewhat around. I hope you, Mena and Moid come back someday. If not I understand. But I'll never forget any of them and I haven't forgotten you 😭😭😭

[sharp-rosee]

Anyone who messaged me (and blocked me) because of a blog called "sharp-rosee" callout -

She is insanely racist. Her "call-out" post consists of links of me calling out others racism, and because she can't fathom that a white person isn't racist, she assumes I'm a WOC, and proceeds to be incredibly misogynistic to me.

This person is not normal and she thinks I am suicide baiting her (she provides no proof of that because I haven't.) She started harrassing me because I called her out for calling another user a "retarded brown bitch" (Here I said "monkey" bc I forgot the actual words of that. I couldn't correct myself because again she blocked me).

I just wanted to let my moots know so we can laugh together. The person behind this blog is savetheanimals (she changes her URL constantlyy).

[sharp-rosee]

Im noticing patterns of "radical feminists" who closely orbit conservatives - straight up conservatives (yes even males) and still average a decent following.

From an outsider looking in, I can definitely understand why TRAs think we are conservative despite us arguing the opposite, when other radblr blogs say the same, yet engage with conservative males and when you question them they ignore you or accuse you of imagining things.

These blogs seem to have an overlap with the others that were involved in perpetuating the "biphobia" rhetoric where some blogs were being extremely misogynistic to bisexuals / lesbians / straighties to sew distrust in our group and further spread the "radblr has a biphobia problem" discourse.

A lot of these blogs are very apparent when you look into them and pay attention. Even those I am following are orbiters. I would recommend making sure you're following actual radfem blogs and not these sock accounts.

[sharp-rosee]

Someone being a blatant misogynist, supporting rape, being racist, supporting anti-feminist ideas (being for shaving/ascribing to beauty standards), and saying "I am not a radfem," and then seeing other radfems call it a No True Scottsman fallacy when another radfem calls them... not a radfem is so insane.

It is the exact same thing as TRAs comparing us to conservatives and tradwives.

Radical feminism isn't just a group of friends. It's a political ideology, and if you cannot even do the bare minimum of not being a bigot/feminist action, you're an orbiter at best. A lot of you need to end it with your retained TRA "I am what I say I am," self-ID logic.

Anyone who says they're a radfem is not always a radfem. For the group who preaches definitions and truth, that all goes out the window when you want to feel persecuted, or when your friends are being problematic and don't want to awknowledge it - or even when you don't want to have any introspection into your own anti-feminist actions and mindset.

All of this to say, if you still think we accept racism or misogyny here, you aren't a radfem, nor a feminist at all.

[sharp-rosee]

Gotta love how this person doesn't try to make it seem like they're different people lmao.

Also gotta love how the misogyny jumps out from the original message.

Anyways we all know this is @cisplus because she's upset I called out that she's rich lmaoo. Of course she doesn't reblog that though because she KNOWS it looks bad, so she sends a shitton of misogynistic asks because that's all she can do.

[sharp-rosee]

@radicallycooljewishgirl

I find your vent very coincidental as a similar post of yours was deleted but it's contents were described to me by another user (not gonna tag her) after I had this interaction with MandyFem, where I disproved her very blatant racist, anti-immigrant post.

To start:

As someone who makes their whole blog centered around their Jewish experience, you seem oddly eager to dismiss what is very blatantly an alt-right, anti-semetic dogwhistle.

It is very odd you are calling us throwing around the labels "racist" and "Nazi" trivial, while trying to downplay the very real dogwhistle that the anti-immigration rhetoric is a cover for the Great Replacement Theory. Here is my post on that - not that you shouldn't already know this, right?

Not to mention, I had forgotten about this original DM as, because you deleted that post, I was going to ignore it - it couldn't be verified that you said those things. However, when I was looking through @anti-nazi-white-advocate's blog, I found your post reblogged.

Usually being reblogged by someone like that wouldn't be an issue because you can't control who sees your posts- Its odd that they don't show up deleted.

And then... boom! On your blog, I saw your post.

I can't help but to laugh at how you are angry we are calling out racism on Tumblr. How can you be pro Jewish but then support blatant rhetoric steeped in anti-semitism?

You say you're against Nazis but then support the rhetoric being reblogged and endorsed by fellow radfems on this post here. You haven't agreed with it obvi; but you've seen this, haven't you? Otherwise, how would you know to vague about these posts?

Your lack of knowledge on something that should be basic for someone who centers their blog around Israeli women's rights and the rights for other Jewish people is suspicious.

I know your post is about me, BTW. I'm right here. Instead of vagueing like a coward, talk to me.

[sharp-rosee]

I think that's likely a moid or a fed. Real feminists have better things to do than harass women over what they did as teenagers

Seriously though! I'm leaving this fake discourse alone after that last response. Chances are this troll is currently dating a man and is overcompensating for her own guilt.