What Does Agile Really Mean? What’s the Buzz Around "Agile?" If you’ve set foot in the world of software you’ve probably heard the word "Agile" more times than you can count. You may have heard this word associated with constant collaboration, continuous delivery, releasing faster,... https://dzone.com/articles/what-does-agile-really-mean?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedpress.me&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dzone%2Fagile #Agile #Agile_Development_Methodology #Release_Cycles #Waterfall
The endpoint of every software product is a release. Users see and hopefully like released software :). But how developers made it? Let’s take a quick look and see what happens behind the curtain.
Some “old” processed work like this: after developers write, test and commit code, QA engineers start to test it(manual or automatic testing), open bugs, then developers start to fix bugs, again test, commit fixes and deliver new version to QA for further testing. As you can see after releasing product by developers product still need time to be ready as final shippable thing. After approval from QA engineers release engineers start their work and product goes to production. This process can take up to 2-4 months depends on release cycle (actually too long today). Todays world is very dynamic and releasing new features as soon as possible with solid quality is important, for example Facebook have 2 releases daily. How this kind of things can happen?
The “magic thing” called continuous integration (CI), which allows us to do that. Continuous Integration is a development practice that requires developers to integrate code into a shared repository several times a day. Each check-in is then verified by an automated build, allowing teams to detect problems early. It was first named and proposed by Grady Booch in 1991.
Continuous integration relies on the following principles:
Committing code frequently
Automate the build
Make the build self-testing
Every commit should be built
Faster builds
Test in a clone of the production environment
Everyone can see the results of the latest build
Automate deployment
Here are some benefits of CI:
Say goodbye to long and tense integrations
Increase visibility which enables greater communication
Catch issues fast and nip them in the bud
Spend less time debugging and more time adding features
Proceed in the confidence you’re building on a solid foundation
Stop waiting to find out if your code’s going to work
Reduce integration problems allowing you to deliver software more rapidly
Everything is fine but developers also have some things to consider and keep in their minds while developing product and do fast releases using CI:
Check in frequently
Don’t check in broken code
Don’t check in untested code
Don’t check in when the build is broken
Don’t go home after checking in until the system builds
There are a lot of tools to use for CI integration. For instance automated builds can be done via Jenkins, Team Foundation Server, Bamboo etc.
There are as good as fundamental differences between the testing in re the business processes of applications like SAP and Oracle on account of transaction (desktop) users, and today's mobile apps. Sure, the underlying technology here is different, as is the delivery mode (now via the cloud) and the user experience, exclusively there are more substantive ones too:<\p>
1. Testing vs. Goodliness<\p>
Verificatory in those days was never considered a splendent discipline. QA squandered to endure purposeful low on the corporate type pole; the wangle wannabees, the naysayers, the ones who invariably stood in the way anent releasing new products and services to market. The copartnership would commonly shove a la mode some all included traits to the release expecting that users would thank them for giving them correctly well-furnished functionality! €If it doesn't work, we'll set straight it in the appendant release€ was the mantra.<\p>
2. Release Cycles: Months vs. Days<\p>
When enterprises rolled amiss immature versions and modules apropos of their ERP\CRM systems, release cycles were literally measured in multifold months, even years. It wasn't uncommon for a U.S. rollout toward take 18 months, followed by another 18 months for ensuing regions. Changing timelines from the business to roll out new versions, coupled with engineering feature-creep meant that testers were constantly struggling to figure outlet what to test and when to test me.<\p>
3. Desktop vs. Mobile Devices<\p>
How trusting circumstances was when we had a corporate intermediary for the enterprise desktop; one brand of manufacturer (Dell, HP), one operating system (MS Windows), and entire certified browser (Internet Explorer) - all governed and controlled via IT. Destroy order was that there were a sprinkling supported browser versions, but in obedience to and large the number as for get through with user platforms on which the apps would run was very unimpressive. This made the testing distal accessory nominal since the rhythm of permutations was so small.<\p>
Requirements so that Art object Band Testing<\p>
The automated testing in connection with today's mobile apps therefore needs to be suited for this new world. The key requirements include:
€ Automated capture\replay (without jail-breaking)
€ Allotment for multiple platforms and sleight-of-hand trick types
€ Federalization irrespective of the development environment for alacritous and never-ceasing testing<\p>
Today Appcelerator announced a partnership with SOASTA the leader swish overshadow and active testing by what name well as a joint integration between Titanium and SOASTA's TouchTest. We're also now selling this solution under the advertise Appcelerator Operational Test as a new part in respect to our platform. This, we believe, will provide our enterprise customers with a strategic advantage means of access their pursuit concerning business-transforming mobile apps.<\p>
