Rereading: The Transformers (2009): Police Action (#25, 27, and 29)
‘Nobody’s forgotten about the Decepticons… but with most of them badly injured and Megatron gone, they aren’t our first priority.’
This is Bumblebee’s line, but unfortunately it reflects the general approach that was taken for the majority of this comic’s run, so…
In earnest, the whole ‘Police Action’ storyline is very much centred on the Autobots and their internal issues, in particular the dynamic between Prowl and Spike Witwicky. I’m not a huge fan of the way Costa tends to characterise Prowl, with a lot of focus on him being a mild spoof of hard-boiled detective characters. However, the hard-boiled-lite writing actually worked better here, I believe, because Prowl is actually given something to investigate - Spike, and whatever shady stuff he is up to. This makes the characterisation feel a bit more appropriate and lends the narrative some much-needed momentum, especially with the way the comic jumps back and forth between this story-line and the ‘Chaos Theory’ story-line.
My chief complaint for the way the Prowl-Spike relationship is handled is that things seemed inconsistent to me. For example, in issues #25 and #27, Prowl seems very attached to Spike, when I could swear he was a bit skeptical about him in relatively recent issues. Meanwhile, from the opposite direction, Spike complains about Prowl’s plotting, but I’m not terribly conscious of him doing much other than standard investigations in this run - certainly not the kind of conspiratorial, underhanded sort of thing that Spike is implying. I could argue that Spike is misinterpreting or misrepresenting, but I also wonder whether this was driven by Costa’s awareness of Prowl’s characterisation in other series, like Last Stand of the Wreckers?
Costa opts to do something pretty interesting with Spike at this point in the series. Specifically, in Issue 27 the comic uses one of the female characters, Sandra, as a critical voice: she points out that Spike acts like an action movie hero and the ways that this generates problems for him and everyone around him. Now, I think this is actually an interesting gesture, pointing out the flaws in Spike’s character, as that’s something I’ve quibbled with in previous issues. However, this comes in Issue 27 out of a 31 issues series, and the series has to devote most of its time to more plot-relevant events than character development or exploration at this point. I don’t mind the idea of Spike as a protagonist who has a lot of selfish or self-destructive traits or who might represent a particular idea of toxic masculinity (mid-2000s, American action hero/bad-boy edition ™), however I do think that leaving it until this late into the series to start addressing makes it come across as a bit of a feeble gesture. I think virtually every reader realised that Spike was not being written as a very good person within a few panels of seeing him, but the comic seemed to ask readers to accept him at face value for, only to make a single gesture towards deconstructing the character at the last moment.
This frustration is a recurring feeling for me with these issues. As I was reading through, I was struck by how many new elements or ideas seemed to be appearing right as the story was wrapping up - the apparent attachment Prowl has for Spike, this attempt to add nuance to Spike’s character, Spike arguing that a millenia-old robot should be more open to moral compromise and being frustrated by the apparent naïveté of the Autobots... It increasingly started to feel as if Costa was addressing a lot of the criticism that his run had received and trying to develop some of these concepts, which is nice, but by this point it was Issue 29 of the comic, the last one with these characters in it. This really doesn’t help the feeling that these final issues are rushed, and that Costa’s run is decompressed to a fault, generally lacking in characterisation, and has large areas of wasted potential.







