15. Work that wasn’t published - Scientology article
For this last piece of work (as of the agreed upon deadline for submission of work) I am including another piece that was not published and that was an article I did on Scientology.
The reason this wasn’t published isn’t similar to the others but rather because, even though I submitted it a week or so before the deadline, there just was not enough time to look through it and edit it where necessary with the Rising East editor. Although in saying that it could well go up on Rising East at a later date.
I’m happy with the way this story turned out although it was a little different to how I’d anticipated it. Upon ringing the institution first to ensure I could come in I was told that I’d be able to have a interview with a member of staff. After getting there and being given a tour I was told I couldn't interview or even take notes.
So I unfortunately wasn't able to ask any questions I’d previously prepared. However I still got enough information (including pictures) for a decent article. I was able to take one or two small notes on my phone and immediately after getting out the building I took out my note pad and began to note everything I could remember from my time in there while it was still fresh in my memory.
I chose not just to get the tour and walk around the building but also undertake a ‘Scientology personality test’. Of which I’ve included in my article.
I feel as though this article gave me a great chance to not necessarily indulge in ‘under cover reporting’ but certainly get a grasp of what reporting is like from areas and with groups who may necessarily be happy with your assessment.
If I could change anything about this piece i’d probably have tried to push the questions a little bit more, although that would have been difficult and I’m not sure how much they’d have allowed before ending the interview all together.
Scientology.
A faith that the majority of folk when quizzed wouldn’t even consider to be a legitimate religious path, yet there I was, in a large building, plastered - almost obnoxiously so, with the word ‘Church’.
The introduction to Scientology is unlike almost any other religion that one could experience. Before discovering anything about them they must first discover information about you.
Your full name, phone number, age and even your full address.
All taken rather cheerfully by an elderly gentleman on the reception desk.
Of course one of the first things you learn about Scientology is that you are more than welcome to learn more about the faith, providing they have the answer in a video format.
Yes video. Scientology if nothing else appears to live up to its namesake and make good use of technology to clarify its message.
With an entire floor of its considerably expansive Church dedicated to what can only be described as something similar to an interactive museum tour on lsd, Scientology demonstrates it is a faith with considerable funds to spare.
If you’re a sucker for luminous logos and images bordering on gaudy (as I can’t help but admit I am) then you should experience a Scientologist church at least once in your life for the experience.
Typically an introduction to Scientology will take an entire day, following the exchange of information and ensuring that you’ve not brought any recording equipment with you (this was the only faith that requested I didn’t take notes) then you head on up to the orientation room and are told to wander freely examining the different exhibitions.
I am able to catch the Scientologist that escorted me upstairs watching me, through the reflection, as I sit in front of an introductory video however.
The complexity of the Church can be seen clearly in the video and visual displays. There is an extraordinarily complex system of hierarchy organised in such a way that it may not even appear that there is a structure of influence.
This, in my opinion, seems to have been intentionally created in such a way.
The Church, spread out into many different departments, with many different positions, all seem to have influence over the others and with that it could be seen that this prevents any real modification of Church belief or doctrine as it is simply impossible to organise any wide scale change.
Following the introduction you are lead to an exam room to undertake a free ‘personality test’.
Walking into the exam room I couldn’t help but notice a rather larger room filled with around 5 or 6 men taking a test in complete silence as a young, quite attractive, young woman walks around marking papers.
It only adds to the sense of bizarreness that this is quite unlike other faiths.
The exam itself is of considerable length, you almost feel as though you’re filling out a driving theory test.
Then, generally speaking, your exam is ‘marked’ by a trained Scientologist.
The questions themselves nothing to complex, ‘do you find yourself often being depressed about noting particular, ‘would you say sometimes you don’t confine in people’.
Questions that are almost reminiscent of a low-grade fair fortune teller.
The ‘fortune teller-ness’ continues as the Scientologist reads your results in such a way they tell you information you’ve already told them.
‘Your test results show you’re sometimes a bit lazy..’
Well they probably would. As I indicated that in the test.
But if you are lacking drive in some areas of your life, Scientology has the solution.
For a fee you can sign up for a course to help you with your life’s issues, as the men in the aforementioned room were most likely taking part in.
As my test showed that I often lack the ability to say no.
‘I think you need to sign up for this course to learn how to say no more often’ I was informed.
‘No thank you.’ I replied.
And as I left the Church of Scientology. I couldn’t help but notice that it was the only Church I’ve ever attended that had a card reader on an evangelizer’s desk.
That seemed to sum up, at least my, Scientologist experience.











