seen from Spain
seen from Australia
seen from China
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Australia
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Macao SAR China
seen from United States
seen from Latvia
seen from China
seen from Lithuania
seen from Macao SAR China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
Writing a cover letter or personal statement? If so, make sure you can detect run-on sentences and use proper punctuation. You can also attend Saturday's workshop for help. #Run-ons #punctuation #sentences #laccd #arclavc #communitycollege
New Post has been published on Wordsmith Essays
New Post has been published on http://wordsmithessays.com/ask-an-editor/how-to-fix-awkward-writing
How to Fix Awkward Writing
The major difficulty in giving advice about writing is that there is a gulf of difference between theory and practice. It is extraordinarily easy to tell someone that their story needs a stronger climax or that their work sounds awkward and stilted, but explaining how to fix these things in a real, practical way is extremely difficult. That’s why today, we’re going to take some time to go over some practical demonstrations with a couple examples of common problems and easy ways to fix them.
Let’s begin with something that almost everyone has trouble with. Can you spot the problem with the following passage?
There was a loud roar as the ground began to shake and the trees began to sway and Jack knew that the creature had torn free from his shackles and broken from the cage. He was coming for him now and nothing would or could stop it this time.
If you’re having trouble spotting the problem, try reading it out loud. Notice how awkward it is? Anyone reading this will probably end up breathless and stumbling over words, because the writer has made a few simple mistakes.
Run-Ons Make for Awkward Sentences
First, they’ve opened with a major run-on sentence. That first sentence is actually five sentences crammed together.
There was a loud roar.
The ground began to shake.
The trees began to sway.
Jack knew that the creature had torn free from his shackles.
Jack knew that the creature had broken from the cage.
It’s understandable why the writer might have tried this, they’re trying to get across the panic and fear of Jack, but the result is something that’s just difficult to read. Instead, a better approach is to break it up a little more while still maintaining the breathless quality.
There was a loud roar as the ground shook and the trees swayed. Hearing the sounds, Jack knew that the creature had torn free from his shackles and broke out of its cage.
The second sentence also has a problem with how confusing the action becomes. The first thing to fix is the typo, where the creature is referred to as “he” instead of “it”:
It was coming for him now and nothing would or could stop it this time.
Deliver a Punch for More Exciting Writing
Finally, the entire passage lacks a strong punch. The last few words are half-hearted and devoid of any emotion. Try tearing them apart and using the final bit as punctuation, a grim bit of finality that will really sell Jack’s fear of what’s happening.
It was coming for him now and nothing would stop it this time. Nothing could stop it this time.
Now, it’s just a matter of putting it all together and cleaning it up a bit so that we get something like:
There was a loud roar as the ground shook and the trees swayed. Jack heard the sounds and knew that the creature had torn free from his shackles, breaking from its cage. It was coming for him now and nothing would stop it this time. Nothing could stop it this time.
Sounds like Jack might be in a bit of trouble. Hopefully. we can help him out next time, when we’ll be discussing character motivations and how to use them to get your characters into and out of trouble. Until then, stay safe and keep writing!
Once your writing is finished, why not come to Wordsmith Essays and let our team of professional editors help you polish it up? From statement of purpose editing to short story editing, we can handle all of your writing needs. Stop by our order page today to see what we can do for you.
I have a SAT Writing question: Neuroscientists have gained new insights into how the brains works by adopting research methods used to study other elaborate (systems, this ranges from computer chips to) the stock market. Why is the answer "systems ranging from computer chips to" right? Thank you so much.
As it’s written, it’s a run-on. When you get rid of “this ranges,” then you make the second clause not independent, which eliminates the run-on problem.
Source: Zazzle
After college Susan King founded a publishing [[company but eventually reduced]] her role in the firm to pursue her interests in storytelling and art by creating her own books. The correct answer says no error in this sentence but I chose the answer and I wish to know why is it wrong? My answer: [[company, however, she eventually reduced]]
Your answer creates a run-on. You cannot join two complete thoughts with a comma and “however.” Read this.
Recently I've noticed that when I try to sing/yell really loud or try to hit a high note I get this pain & discomfort in my throat & it makes me feel like I have throat damage or something bc I was making myself puke 4 times a day and now I smoke 4-5 days a week if not more & yeah I feel like a victim of throat cancer & am sketching myself out 😂😂
Although the kings and queens of England are considered Canada’s monarchs, true political power lies with the prime minister, that person is elected by the Canadian citizenry.(A) as it is (B)the person who holds true political power is the prime minister, which is elected(C)true political power lies with the prime minister, who is elected(D)the prime minister, the source of true political power, elected(E)true political power is with the prime minister and is elected
It’s a run-on as it is. (B) and (C) would both fix the run-on issue, but (B) is no good because it uses “which” for a person instead of “who.”
