The infamous lorelei issue that aged very poorly but it gave me some interesting comic panels that a bitchless character's stan yearns for
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Russia

seen from Russia
seen from Italy

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Russia
seen from China
The infamous lorelei issue that aged very poorly but it gave me some interesting comic panels that a bitchless character's stan yearns for
I will die on the hill that Simonson!Loki, unlike most of his pre-2010s depictions, was intended to be attractive, and is thus a bad example of an "ugly comics!Loki."
He was drawn quite pretty in the infamous Lorelei issue because Marvel got as close to fucking as they could with the CCA on their ass.
I genuinely think if people think Simonson's Loki is ugly it's because they've conflated him with other Lokis of the pre-2010s.
Building off the post I reblogged about Loki usually being portrayed as the "ugly one" in comics with some exceptions (e.g. some Simonson issues (personal opinion not supported by the narrative) and AoA onwards).
My very hot take is that looks-wise Simonson!Loki > Simonson!Thor.
Am I batshit for this? (Only consider physical appearance for poll, not personality)
Yes. WTF is wrong with you? (*Many things*)
No. Your Loki brainrot has shown you the truth.