At the same time I want to consider another idea that really recontextualizes that whole incident between Majikus and Spelaris where after the backstory is recited, at the end of the series, we learn some new context: Before Spelaris herself was raped, Majikus herself had a similar incident and never spoke up about it.
This could add a new layer of nuance to Maj’s whole deal because she felt too ashamed to admit what happened to Spelaris at any point of her life, and that need to feel strong just isolated her sister of emotional support she could’ve otherwise provided so it’s kind of selfish.
For Majikus, investing herself into Spelaris’ trauma and making it about is herself is because it kind of actually was about herself too. She sees a way to fight back against people who make her feel that way without having to admit to having been “defiled” like that and so she’s using her sister as a buffer.
And when Spelaris refuses to go along even after Maj’s rhetoric that it’ll be a good example for other victims to speak out, it really hurts her because to Maj, Spel has admitted that she wouldn’t do it for her own sister. That she wouldn’t stick her neck out if Majikus chose to confront her own rapist about this.
I am concerned about how this could undermine a point I was making about Majikus’ character, where it’s that she presumes to speak on behalf of others despite missing some key distinctions. And I feel this reveal would ruin that by showing she actually does have a place to speak. But then again Majikus can only get away with looking at things from a collectivistic perspective; In the end, Spelaris is still her own individual who has chosen not do the same and she already said she’s not judging those who would engage in a fight.
In the end it’s still her incident and her trauma and Majikus was not there when it happened anyhow. Plus the context of how I reveal it could also help because it would come probably around the final battle where Spelaris admits that she helped Khemh and the Monster Realmers by setting up that barrier spell as she urges Maj not to go through with the ritual.
Majikus tries to appeal to Spelaris and admits that Yeah, she herself was assaulted before Spelaris and that played into her being so invested. At which point Spelaris snaps because Fuck off, are you actually trying to make me feel sorry for you?! Maybe if they were still kids but they’re well past that after everything else Majikus has done!
And in the end she points out how the hypocrisy, the cowardice. How Spelaris was used as a convenient buffer for Majikus to attack her trauma without truly facing it. Spelaris is supposed to expose herself for the sake of justice against all others who would do the same but Maj is allowed to hide her rape because it makes her look bad, when this would’ve added to an allegation?!
She had her own trauma all along to work with she didn’t need Spelaris’. Let herself be inspired once she realizes she couldn’t allow the same to happen to others after accepting it for herself. But the way it’s okay for Maj to hide it… Does she really think so lowly of her sister?!
And Majikus tries to pivot the discussion to how this all would’ve happened with or without the incident because this is bigger than them. People like Mammon still would’ve cast cruelty just as readily and easily and they needed to be stopped and they were and it felt good to Maj. And so hypocritically she pivots the discussion to this subject just to say they need to pivot away when it doesn’t work.
Basically, this could work if it’s not about feeling bad for Majikus but instead backfiring on her to do the opposite as it exposes how much it sucks and how self hatred actually does loop around to being cruel to other people.
Idk I do think one idea I want for Majikus is that she’s consistent and upfront. She doesn’t like Narellus’ idea of false flag attacks, she prefers to wear her heart on her sleeve and states to her fellow warlocks before confronting Hydrownus alone when recruiting him (and later reiterates to Viracious about the topic of taking out his sister as a liability, which she proves) that she doesn’t make people do what she herself is not willing to do.
The hypocrisy would still make it meaningful like it’s all Majikus’ way of trying to make up for that crucial omission without actually confronting it; Again, projecting onto a buffer. So when she murders Spelaris right after this she reaffirms to herself what she should’ve done a long time ago about being consistent, about facing stuff head-on or whatever.
But I guess it all boils down to what direction I want to go because both could work. There’s the hypocrisy but also Majikus operating from such clueless privilege and how the latter is arguably more common and thus hard-hitting for a satire. Any thoughts?












