Silim!
I’m aware you’ve been asked a similar question in the past, but for the sake of (Sumerian!) grammatical/word-order correctness, I have a polite query:
How does one say, “child (born) of the prince/ss,” or “child (born) of Ereshkigal” in Sumerian (but not cuneiform, just transliterated English letters, plz)?
I figured the word-order would be something like the examples listed below:
Dumu-nun-tud-da, Dumu-nun-tu-da, Dumu-nun-dú-da (dumu ‘(noun) child, son, daughter, descendant’ + nun ‘(noun) prince/ss, noble, master/mistress’ + tud, tu, dú ‘(verb) to be born’ + -da, genitive)
Hi! You've found the right vocabulary, but are just a little off on the grammar.
For just a noun phrase like this, the simplest to do is dumu "child" + [name/noun] + genitive case ending -(a)(k) "of". Plugging in nun "prince", you'd get dumununa "child of the prince". Nun is usually used for a male prince; for "princess" I'd use egir, which is more specific, in dumuegira. "Child of Ereshkigal" would follow the same pattern, dumuEreshkigala. Note also that if the noun ends in a vowel, the final -a of the genitive ending disappears: dumuUtu "child of Utu".
If you want to use tud "be born", the set phrase structure is dumu + [name] + directive case ending -(e) + tud-da. "Child born of the prince" would thus be dumu nune tudda, "child born of the princess" would be dumu egire tudda, and "child born of Ereshkigal" is dumu Ereshkigale tudda. That final -e also disappears after a vowel, so dumu Utu tudda (as it appears in the Hymn to Nanše A line 85).
The interaction of verbs like tud with the different cases in Sumerian can be confusing. I hope that's clear, and let me know if I can clarify in any way!












