#system thinking

[captaingimpy]

Review: The Amateur (2025) — The Quiet Evolution of a Realist Action Hero

The Amateur is the kind of movie critics love to mislabel. You’ll hear stuff like “doesn’t offer a fresh perspective” or “too grounded for its own good”—which is basically code for “this didn’t have enough explosions to keep my ADHD in check.” But if you actually watch it, really watch it, what you’ll find is something way more powerful than a typical espionage thriller. What you’ll find is an…

Review: The Amateur (2025) — The Quiet Evolution of a Realist Action Hero

[sustainableyadayadayada]

reading list on ecology

This blog post from Geekcologist has a fantastic set of links to classic essays and more recent blog posts on ecological topics. As an amateur (albeit an amateur who just spent 3.5 years thinking about the intersection of ecology and engineering and myself wrote about 250 pages on the topic) who cares about the natural world I think it is critically important to try to understand and grapple with…

[convivialdave]

While each of these scientists was brilliant, many claimed they would not achieved such success without collaboration. Science needs conversations. Businesses need managers to lead and participate in conversations that result in team collaborative learning.

[tinyeyescomics]

The West and the East have different natural philosophies at its origin. The former is concrete and rational, which treats nature as an object that we can observe, study and eventually understand. It separates human and nature as the subject and the object standing at the opposite side, paving the way for modern science. On the contrary, Chinese natural philosophy is generally abstract and mysterious, treating the universe as a whole system (human as part of it), seeing connections between elements. Laozi(or Lao-Tzu), a great ancient Chinese philosopher, describes Dao(or Tao) as the source of existence, but it’s unseen and indescribable. This type of system thinking and its uncertainty may have slowed down the development of science in Chinese society, but it also provides complementary perspectives for modern science, as we now see in Quantum physics. P.S. If you don’t know Laozi or haven’t read his book “Daodejing”, I highly recommend checking it out!

[systemdesign]

Understanding of learning

After being immersed in the subject for some time, our derived definition of learning looks something like this -   Learning is a process of construction of knowledge through an action-reaction mechanism with the environment, based on prior experiences and reflections on these experiences.

Knowledge includes the ability to modify, transform and operate on an object or an idea. The learning process involves a construction of things which can be shared with others. (Assessment). A learner should be able to explain, extend and evaluate what he/she has learned.

[megamarijke]

Re-thinking Progress: The Circular Economy - By the Ellen MacArthur Foundation

[neo-somaliana]

thinking out loud

I wonder when we'll realize, as a collective, that our current values we gauge progress and process with is backwards. We speak of white supremacy and white privilege and developing nations - It's like we're hanging on to the coattails of the destructive forces of this world, trying to make them undo their magnum opus. We wag a finger at the original beneficiaries of the system but when a non-white makes it in that same system we celebrate First so and so Got accepted by 8 Ivy Leagues Richest so and so It's like we're neurotic and split into a hatred for exploitation and a longing for power. Only two types of individuals shape the world : destroyers and healers. Healers are those who've refused to submit to the dominating Cartesian destructive perceptions. They've taken the time to process the system that tried to kill them and they heal. A new reality is never born of correcting the old. It's created from the alchemic transformation of being destroyed and then rejuvenated by faint hopes of an adjacent possibility. What would happen if we didn't use economy to measure human potential and depth? What if we could create a living system that encourages a growth mindset, rewards individual expression, and work towards a collective harmony by integrating all the variables? “This state of affairs is not inevitable. Humans were able to employ science and law to transform common holdings into a commodity and then into capital; we also have the ability to reverse this path, transforming some of our now overabundant capital into renewed commons.” ― Fritjof Capra, The Ecology of Law: Toward a Legal System in Tune with Nature and Community

[jw-trust-system]

Most writing doesn’t fail because it’s bad.

It fails because it’s forgettable.

Clean sentences. Nice structure. Zero impact.

In a world flooded with content, clarity isn’t enough.

If your message doesn’t hold attention, build trust, and actually move people it’s already lost.

I don’t just write.

I take complex ideas fintech, systems, trust and turn them into narratives people understand, remember, and act on.

If you’re building something real and your message isn’t landing, that’s not a visibility problem.

It’s a clarity problem.

Let’s fix it.