AUDIENCE: That was my question—weren't you taking a real risk in that picture [Sweet Smell of Success] because of antagonizing Walter Winchell and people like that?
LANCASTER: We didn't care a thing about that. What was Walter Winchell going to do, shoot us? That wasn't the disturbing factor. The problem was, we were a young company and we were doing reasonably interesting work, we worked very independently, and this was a labor of love for us. We started out with a $600,000 budget and wound up with a film that cost $2,600,000. We paid Clifford Odets, before he got through with the script, a total of $300,000 that year. The film was a total disaster—it lost $3.5 million. It's one of those things. Yet I can't go anyplace in the world without people talking about how marvelous that picture was. When I tell them it lost money they're stunned, they can't believe it. But we didn't put our own money in it. United Artists put up the money.
CRIST: At the time, Sweet Smell of Success was considered an astounding, really daring art film, because of its grittiness.
LANCASTER: It had the special quality of that kind of life. The style of the language Odets used was very "in" New Yorkese, a special-world kind of talk. It's ironic, because we thought the film was going to be, perhaps not a huge success, but certainly a financial success, because Tony Curtis and I had just finished making a film called Trapeze and Trapeze, with Gina Lollobrigida, grossed $17 million the first time around. And if that means anything, you would think that the combination can be repeated.
CRIST: Maybe it was the difference between brawn and brains.
— Take 22: Moviemakers on Moviemaking, transcript of Judith Crist’s interview with Burt Lancaster during one of her film weekends at the Tarrytown Conference Center, 1975.