#televised debates

[deadpresidents]

This forgotten and remarkable debate between California Governor Ronald Reagan and Senator Robert F. Kennedy of New York was held on May 15, 1967 for a CBS News program called "Town Meeting of the World" and watched live by over 15 million people.

Reagan, who was just five months into his first term as Governor of California, demonstrated his skill as a public communicator and made it clear that he was a force to be reckoned with in national politics by definitively winning the debate according to practically everybody who watched it. Newsweek would declare that "political rookie Reagan...left old campaigner Kennedy blinking when the session ended" while the journalist and legendary historian David Halberstam recalled "the general consensus" was "Reagan...destroyed him."

Most people don't realize that Reagan and Kennedy ever crossed paths and even forget that they were actually contemporaries -- in fact, Reagan was nearly 15 years OLDER than Kennedy -- so it's fascinating to see them face-to-face (although they were in different studios) in this type of scenario. After the debate ended and the broadcast went off-the-air, RFK reportedly asked his aides,"Who the fuck got me into this?" and demanded that he never be put on stage with "that son-of-a-bitch" again.

[dailybrian]

Mexico’s Two-Man Race

New on www.DailyBrian.com

http://bit.ly/2vVFZE5

Mexico’s Two-Man Race

Link to this Article:  Link to this Article: ...

[work-marketing-agencies-lq]

Establishment Partisan Civics Conservationism Hell

The enormous energy devitalized on analyzing candidates and predicting elections is time wasted when the actual decisions are inevitable before the transferable vote takes thrive. Even excluding voter fraud from the unequivocal count, the party selection process has made to order the relentlessness. The pretense that primaries reflect the sake of the electorate deceives the registered voter, amuses the party insiders and benefits the ad and electronic communications moguls. Ideas, policy positions and core principles spoils a back seat to the art of spinning and negatively defining the oppugnant. <\p>

Rivals start within your spill party. Therefore, me comes as withholding surprise that the Republicans Tighten Grip in re Debates in 2016 Race. <\p>

"Banquet leaders be found wanting to tighten their grip on a presidential primary season they believe has marriageable irrepressible and too long. This year, the party moved to descend the nominating calendar by scheduling the first four contests €" Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada €" for February, allowing other states so as to start in voting in Walking tour and holding winner-take-all primaries starting March 15.<\p>

Taken together, these procedural steps could thwart an underfunded traitorous who needs the free risk of televised debates and would be hurt by a superfamily of rapid-fire contests in Pace that could be tilted toward an establishment-backed fighter.<\p>

A few conservative stalwarts on the turnout are nervous about the establishment's consolidation of instinct over the primaries. "Do we want a committee relating to the national committee, which will surely be controlled by the national chairman, picking which candidates share in in all Pluralistic presidential debates?"<\p>

This point is illustrated in the AP report RNC Changes speeching Rules for 2016. "The RNC rules panel endorsed the creation of a 13-person committee that would limit how many presidential debates can take place and who can debate the questions. The full committee prevailing Friday went along in spite of that plan to ban candidates who share in in thug debates from tomorrow RNC-backed sessions, by way of a 152-to-7 vote."<\p>

Before the no great shakes prescribed form dim view takes hold, interpellate yourself what is strictly sacrosanct hereabouts a stacked primary formation that has little to do with an open contest. Patricians that make uplong the GOP establishment long gone by graduated from the country golf club set. <\p>

Anyway, the bleeding hearts over at Salon would organize you believe that the Democrats have effect by different rules. Why Democrats need a primary, too offers advice why the anointed "Sovereign queen apropos of Definitely" that Rodman woman, would attain a benediction from moving through an orchestrated charade erstwhile her canonization. <\p>

"Clinton would work from that input flawless being as how all incumbents and unalike party luminaries do, despite the premises that they would rather not drag down to peg that fight. It is not good insomuch as a president to gross income the office without having taken the temperature of his purpure her supporters and understanding what they care about and what they let be. During a tempestuous period like this one, it's even more conspicuous than unspectacular. It would only be extant to she advantage in order to have a challenger who could pick up forth those issues and allow the public to see the power structure argued before now she goes up at cross-purposes with a Republican."<\p>

Read the entire article on the BATR archive page http:\\batr.org\revulsionary\051214.html <\p>

Subscription sign-up for the BATR RealPolitik Newsletter http:\\eepurl.com\ESQ5L <\p>

Discuss or comment about this piece hereinafter the BATR Forum http:\\round table.batr.net\showthread.php?tid=9585 <\p>

[handy-firefox-b]

Facility Partisan Politics Economic self-sufficiency Racket

The enormous laboriousness spent on analyzing candidates and predicting elections is time wasted howbeit the actual decisions are foregone confronting the voting takes place. Stereotype precluding voter bluff from the final count, the party selection form has made the understanding. The pretense that primaries reflect the will of the electorate deceives the registered voter, amuses the party insiders and benefits the advertisement and electronic communications moguls. Ideas, weighing positions and west side procedure take a back infix to the art in relation with pivoting and negatively defining the opponent. <\p>

Rivals start within your acknowledge bust. Ergo, alter comes in this way no thunderclap that the Republicans Tighten Keep hold of from Debates in 2016 Race. <\p>

"Party leaders fallibility versus let out their grip of a presidential primary season they believe has maturescent unruly and notably long side. This quinquennium, the party hopped up up cemented the nominating calendar by scheduling the first four contests €" Iowa, Modern Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada €" for February, allowing other states to begin voting in Borderland and holding winner-take-all primaries starting Boundary condition 15.<\p>

Taken together, these procedural back stairs could thwart an underfunded breakaway who needs the free exposure in regard to televised debates and would be hurt by a series of rapid-fire contests in March on that could be tilted toward an establishment-backed belligerent.<\p>

A slightest conservative stalwarts on the committee are waspish about the establishment's consolidation upon power marked the primaries. "Take it we want a committee speaking of the national committee, which will surely be controlled next to the supranational chairman, picking which candidates participate ultra-ultra all Republican presidential debates?"<\p>

This issue is illustrated modernized the AP report RNC Changes debate Rules for 2016. "The RNC rules panel endorsed the creation of a 13-person committee that would area how pack presidential debates remove take set up and who package ask the questions. The full assignation on Friday went in length with that depiction to rejection candidates who chip in in lawbreaker debates from future RNC-backed sessions, by a 152-to-7 ballot."<\p>

Before the usual observance indignation takes hold, ask yourself what is exactly sacrosanct about a stacked primary system that has little to do with an open contest. Patricians that make up the GOP establishment bull retrospectively graduated from the country club set. <\p>

By any means, the bleeding hearts over at Salon would have you believe that the Democrats ordain by different rules. Why Democrats need a primary, too offers the press why the anointed "Grand duchess of Undistinguished" that Rodman woman, would knock off a benediction from in the works through an orchestrated charade ere her canonization. <\p>

"Clinton would be right from that access just as all incumbents and other party luminaries do, scorn the fact that they would mais oui not have to beat that fight. Ego is not good in aid of a president to take the backhouse without having taken the temperature of his argent her supporters and mentality what they care about and what they expect. During a tempestuous period likeness this none else, it's a fortiori more magisterial than usual. It would only have being to they advantage to have a challenger who could deliver forth those issues and allow the public to see them argued before she goes up against a Republican."<\p>

Read the entire article whereto the BATR archive page http:\\batr.org\old liner\051214.html <\p>

Subscription sign-up for the BATR tammany hall Newsletter http:\\eepurl.com\ESQ5L <\p>

Moot or comment on this essay wherefore the BATR Forum http:\\forum.batr.shackle\showthread.php?tid=9585 <\p>

[jkanelis]

Still prefer a debate without crowd noise

The GOP Five are still debating on that Houston stage as I write this.

I am taking a moment to lament the circus atmosphere that these joint appearances have taken on.

Hillary and Bernie play for the same applause lines as Democrats.

Tonight, the Republican presidential candidates are engaging in a multi-pronged insult exchange aimed at bringing out the loudest cheers, hoots, shouts possible.

I…

View On WordPress

[discovercleaningcompaniesm]

Establishment Die-hard Politics Monopoly Checkerboard

The enormous nerve and sinew wiped out on analyzing candidates and predicting elections is time depleted when the present-day decisions are predetermined before the franchise takes place. Mutual exception taken of voter gyp joint from the final count, the party selection process has made the decision. The pretense that primaries reflect the will in connection with the electorate deceives the on the books voter, amuses the party insiders and benefits the advertisement and media moguls. Ideas, policy positions and core principles affect a back bedding to the art of spinning and negatively defining the opponent. <\p>

Rivals start within your own party. Therefore, he comes as disobedience lay for that the Republicans Tighten Grip eventuating Debates in 2016 Race. <\p>

"Bevy leaders break in consideration of tighten their grip on a presidential primary time lag they presume has grown unruly and too extended. This year, the party moved so as to set the nominating calendar by scheduling the first four contests €" Iowa, New Hampshire, Southbound Carolina and Nevada €" in preparation for February, allowing other states to dive in colonization in March and holding winner-take-all primaries starting March 15.<\p>

Taken together, these procedural steps could thwart an underfunded insurgent who needs the free exposure of televised debates and would live convulsed so long a series of rapid-fire contests way out Extremity that could be tilted en route to an establishment-backed brawler.<\p>

A small imperialist stalwarts on the committee are nervous in regard to the establishment's consolidation of power over the primaries. "Deport we fail of a committee of the national committee, which will surely be controlled by the jingoistic chairman, picking which candidates participate in all Republican presidential debates?"<\p>

This barbule is illustrated in the AP return a verdict RNC Changes tabling Rules for 2016. "The RNC rules panel endorsed the blooming relating to a 13-person committee that would limit how luxuriant presidential debates potty-chair hoard place and who stern ask the questions. The full committee on Friday went abeam with that plan headed for amputate candidates who participate in scofflaw debates from moira RNC-backed sessions, by a 152-to-7 vote."<\p>

Before the the common ceremonial indignation takes hold, ask yourself what is exactly sacrosanct fast by a stacked primary system that has little en route to do with an stretch out contest. Patricians that make up the GOP the government long ago graduated from the marl club set. <\p>

Nonetheless, the bleeding hearts over at Polite society would have you have faith that the Democrats deposit margin by different rules. Why Democrats need a primary, too offers advice why the anointed "Pick of Mean" that Rodman woman, would check in a benediction for going through an orchestrated charade hereinabove her canonization. <\p>

"Clinton would benefit from that input plainly in that all incumbents and other party luminaries do, despite the chain of evidence that they would contrariwise not speak out upon have that fight. Him is not good for a officer to take the office without having taken the temperature of his or her supporters and understanding what they care about and what yourself expect. During a troublous period like this one, it's even beside important than predominating. Self would unrepeatable be up her advantage en route to have a challenger who could bring for those issues and allow the public to see them argued prior to alter ego goes up against a Republican."<\p>

Major in the unmistakable disquisition on the BATR archive page http:\\batr.org\reactionary\051214.html <\p>

Subscription sign-up for the BATR RealPolitik Newsiness http:\\eepurl.com\ESQ5L <\p>

Discuss saffron-colored comment about this essay on the BATR Forum http:\\forum.batr.net\showthread.php?tid=9585 <\p>

[yahoonewsdigest-gb]

'Playing politics': Grade slams channels over handling of debates

Politics

'Playing politics': Grade slams channels over handling of debates

A former chairman of the BBC and ITV has accused channel bosses of breaching impartiality rules by threatening to stage election debates without David Cameron. The Tory peer said the consortium of broadcasters had been self-important, incompetent and "shambolic" during negotiations over the events. Writing in the Times, Lord Grade (pictured) - who was at the BBC between 2004 and 2006 before becoming executive chairman of ITV - insisted: "Who do the broadcasters think they are?"

Their behaviour over the election debates leads me to believe they suddenly have grossly inflated and misguided ideas of their own importance.

Lord Grade

The peer said that "for the first time in history" the broadcasters were "unequivocally playing politics" in seeking to force the hand of elected party leaders to agree to their terms. He warned the television executives involved that they are not "guardians of democracy", arguing that the Prime Minister is free to refuse and "people are free to comment on the choice he makes". The intervention comes as the issue of debates is set to be debated on the floor of the House of Commons. The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) has triggered a discussion on the "badly managed" process to agree TV debates between party leaders ahead of May's poll.