tenaciouswidow replied to your post “Hello again! Now I've been reading your posts religiously these last...”
Is it confirmed Isaac was only 4?
Nope, Squid speculation. However, I think we can turn some critical analysis to Isaac’s likely age and narrow it down a bit. Arthur remembers Isaac as “such a good kid”. Probably not a baby, therefore, when he died. He was old enough to have some clear personality. Given Arthur was riding there to see them when he found the graves, Isaac also wasn’t to the age to be old enough to really remember him, and for it to get to the point Eliza and Arthur would be having to answer some serious questions about the family situation. At some point, unless Eliza met another man first and Arthur gracefully stepped off, that was going to happen, with Eliza having to either continue to allow him to visit and them explaining to Isaac why he’s not there full time, or else cut Arthur off from contact completely so as to not hurt Isaac with the fact that his dad loves him very much, but chose loyalty to his gang family rather than them. Arthur has his reasons, yes, but at the end of the day, he was too afraid to leave, so he chose the gang, and it was going to be hard to not hurt Isaac with that information. He and Eliza obviously weren’t at that point yet, so I doubt Isaac was younger than 3, or older than about 6 or so.
He also pretty much has to have died prior to 1893 and the gang’s population explosion. Harder for Arthur to get away from being Eldest Child with all those new responsibilities, and for his frequent absences to not be noticed and remarked upon.







