Animorphs #20: The Discovery thoughts (pt. 3):
My ultimate opinion on David: you can't reduce his story to being about him being right or about the Animorphs being right. Everyone is wrong, and the whole point of this trilogy is that the protagonists are in an awful situation where they feel forced to do unconscionable things to survive, even though they hate causing such harm.
“David is an innocent victim of the Animorphs’ bullying who proves they’re all monsters” — this take feels completely off-base.
“David’s an irredeemable monster who would end up becoming a mass killer no matter what” — this take feels completely off-base.
He’s a kid. He’s a mean kid. He’s a kid who sexually harasses Rachel, bullies Marco, and makes a premeditated near-successful effort to murder both Tobias and Jake. And he’s a kid who wants to see his family again and doesn’t understand just how far he’s in over his head. He gets excluded by the same team that tells him he's not allowed to have any other friends or family anymore. And then he gets trapped as a friggin’ rodent with a two-year life expectancy. But at the time he gets trapped, he’s impersonating a dead kid whom he murdered in order to get one over on Rachel and Jake.
David does terrible things, and some of that is his fault while some of that is clearly a product of not being raised right. Jake and Rachel do terrible things to David, and some of that is their failing to figure out a more peaceful solution while some of that is clearly them being desperate scared kids trying to keep their own family safe. I don't think that any take on this trilogy that has a clear right and wrong side can exist in conjunction with a close reading.
Animorphs books can be read here | Book Club schedule is here









