@theladyfromplanetx replied to your post
“I’ve been seeing this question floating around and I personally felt...”
If she was cast as an Asian woman, it still could've been seen as stereotyping. And how would you explain Luke and Leia as being all white? Are we saying only European clothes should be used as sci-fi aesthetic? What about Leia's buns which were inspired by Hopi women hairstyles and Mexican revolutionaries? The phrase "cultural appropriation" is racist in itself because it's saying cultures have to stay in a box.
There are a lot of unfounded statements you’ve made here, but because I promised to be open to discussion, I will elaborate. Especially if you are asking from a sincere place of curiosity.
“If she was cast as an Asian woman, it still could've been seen as stereotyping.“
It is only considered a stereotype when you are considering how they characterize her if the actress were Asian. If Padme were to follow the “dragon lady” trope or the “timid asian girl” trope, there would be a problem. The clothing itself would only be considered adding to the stereotype if the outfit is inaccurate and thoughtless and is not adding to the story at all.
“And how would you explain Luke and Leia as being all white? Are we saying only European clothes should be used as sci-fi aesthetic?”
In my original post, my critique was never about forbidding creators from being inspired by other cultures, only that they be careful and thoughtful in their execution. Luke and Leia being cast as white was a product of the times -- everyone in main roles were (and seem to still be) being cast as white people.
Would I prefer that they had cast more poc and minorities in general? Of course I do. I don’t know how you want me to explain the casting decisions for the OT nor how that is relevant to this conversation.
“What about Leia's buns which were inspired by Hopi women hairstyles and Mexican revolutionaries?“
Once again, please refer back to my original post. I explained that one way to spot a negative cultural appropriation is from considering historical context.
Consider what that means and deduce what you will. I’m not here to act as spokesperson of all cultures as that is not my place. I only spoke of Amidala’s dress because I am intimately familiar with and have experienced how people will often treat Asian cultures as though they are interchangeable.
“The phrase "cultural appropriation" is racist in itself because it's saying cultures have to stay in a box.”
If you are thinking that it is “racist” because minority groups are using the term to describe situations in which their cultures are being misappropriated by people disrespectfully, I don’t see how that connects at all.
No one is saying that cultures can’t be shared. But sharing doesn’t involve taking what does not belong to you without permission and completely changing the context.
For example, a white person who purchases a qipao -- the traditional silken form fitting dress worn by Chinese people for formal settings -- is technically able to wear that dress. If they bought the dress from Chinese people, those people are essentially giving their permission and allowing any who purchase it to be worn.
However, if said white person were to alter the dress in any way and wear it in an inappropriate setting not befitting its origins -- that is cultural misappropriation. It is cultural appropriation that is disrespectful and negative.