Studio IV - Video content/ context
We developed/simplified the video script just to make it a base idea to what we are going to film, and give us enough ideas to experiment during filming.
Conceptual Script (Not final, I repeat, not final)
Scene 1 - Baby and a lion cub both positioned at the end of the screen.
Scene 2 - They both slowly started moving towards the middle, During this process the baby becomes the child and The lion cub becomes a lion. Eventually meeting up in the middle.
Scene 3 - When they met up in the middle, the lion turned into a man, while the child turned into a woman.
Scene 4 - The man and the woman undress, as they slowly change clothes they change gender.
Scene 5 - After they finished changing gender. Man and the woman hold hands facing each other
Scene 6 - Dancing ballerina silhouette. Close up of the ballerina to double exposure. Double exposure - natural disaster AND bad shit
Scene 7 - Double exposure/overlaying, Crying ( waterfall from eyes)
We designed the script/video content to be the “trick itself, it’ll be some kind of trickster storytelling. We were inspired by how our perception is influenced by our past experiences, knowledge and our culture. So the script is not a traditional Hollywood story-line, where there is a conflict, characters and then the result, this is an experimental storyline, it is designed to have that ambiguity artistic feature, so it should have a complex meaning in it. This is where the book shaped installation came in. The book shaped represents a personal diary, meaning individual’s story, past experiences and knowledge.
A new study tests this hypothesis that personal relevance is the critical factor in differentiating between reality and fantasy by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare the brain’s response when processing real and fictional characters. Anna Abraham of the Max Planck Institute forHuman Brain and Cognitive Sciences in Leipzig, Germany, and the University of Giessen in Giessen, Germany, and D. Yves von Cramon of the Max Planck Institute for Human Brain and Cognitive Sciences and the Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research in Cologne, Germany, have published their results in a recent issue ofPLoS ONE
The processes of perception routinely alter what humans see. When people view something with a preconceived concept about it, they tend to take those concepts and see them whether or not they are there. This problem stems from the fact that humans are unable to understand new information, without the inherent bias of their previous knowledge. A person's knowledge creates his or her reality as much as the truth, because the human mind can only contemplate that to which it has been exposed. When objects are viewed without understanding, the mind will try to reach for something that it already recognizes, in order to process what it is viewing. That which most closely relates to the unfamiliar from our past experiences, makes up what we see when we look at things that we don't comprehend.
Clearly our culture plays a part here, as does our past history and experience with others.
What is 'Real'? How Our Brain Differentiates Between Reality and Fantasy. (2016). Medicalxpress.com. Retrieved 23 October 2016, from http://medicalxpress.com/news/2009-03-real-brain-differentiates-reality-fantasy.html
Influences on Perception . (2016).Creducation.org. Retrieved 23 October 2016, from http://www.creducation.org/resources/perception_checking/influences_on_perception.html