agree with your thoughts about back to you-- there are many unconventional choices made with how the song is performed. even just the way the verses are split up--as one of my non-fandom friends remarked, "it's a bold choice to come out with a first time solo single where you don't even sing for the first minute and a half" (not technically his first but JHO was sort of an outlier). why have bebe sing that much on it? most male artists who "feature" a female artist just have her sing a very sma>
>ll part in the middle or something. i'm very curious about the choice of the lyrics, why that song in particular was seen as a good choice to establish his brand, when the other glimpses of LT1 that we've gotten have been pretty different stylistically? as usual i'm sure i won't get any answers, bc when do i ever when it comes to louis. but i wonder
I totally agree about the unconventional choices - and I will be really interested in how this sits within the album. I think it’s worked quite well as a single - it didn’t peak in it’s first week, which suggests it’s got some traction outside the fandom. So I can see why it was considered a good choice, but I’m interested in seeing the wider context.
I hope you don’t mind me using this as a starting point to discuss the lyrics some more. After the lyrics were leaked but before the song came out I got an ask from someone who really didn’t like the lyrics: “i wanted it to be a cute song, but its describing what seems like an abusive relationship and making it seem cool or something. it's so clearly a terrible and unhealthy relationship, but then it's set to a catchy beat and all about staying with them.“ I didn’t really have an opinion then, because I wanted to know how the song was going to be performed.
I don’t think the song was quite the song my anon was imagining. I think the first verse is the best part of the song - and the fact that Bebe has it really sets the tone. It’s describing someone who is struggling with her life and is in a messed up relationship - but also makes it clear that the relationship has some upsides. For me, having the women’s voice introduce the relationship like that, makes later parts where there is violent imagery seem metaphorical - and particularly from the man’s voice - exaggerated. It doesn’t come across to me as an abusive relationship - nothing in the lyrics or the performance suggest power and control.
The question then becomes what are the implications of using violent metaphors in a song about a relationship? And I’m against it on both a cultural and artistic level. On a cultural level I do think that using violence that people experience as a metaphor often ends up minimising and normalising that violence. On an artistic level - it’s a cliche - and the first verse is much more interesting and specific than the rest of the song.
I really like Back to You, but partly I think that’s because there’s an ambiguity in the song that I don’t understand. For me Louis’ performance doesn’t quite match the lyrics of the song, but in a way that gives it layers. Again it’s hard to know how much of this is intentional - the different ways that Louis and Bebe perform the song seem to me to be a result of different performing styles and not knowing each other. But it does end up affecting the video in interesting ways.