Discover Top Posts Tagged with #vickers chapuk

CALL OUT POST（Updated on 2026 January 6th.）

Please block these people in the Cuphead/Cuphead Parents community: @fukuk1bringmyfriendback @ask-cup-mug-parents @inkkmnkm @amy-time（All of these accounts belong to k）

Now, R has deleted that post and deactivated the account. As long as no one brings it up again, the post will remain gone. To avoid letting things escalate further, she chose not to reappear on Tumblr and publicly bring up the matter again.

R has already issued a formal apology on Chinese social media. She admitted to everything she had done and has been actively working on self-improvement.

Although what she did was extremely wrong, I admire her courage to face being condemned by so many people. And I also respect her later “self-reflection.”

All of the above comes from information shared by someone familiar with the situation.

The owner of @ask-cup-mug-parents @inkkmnkm is K. K once made a statement responding to R’s post (It was once deleted by her, and later revised.). K claimed everything R said was slander. K claimed they were innocent, that they had done nothing wrong to others or to S. However, back in June, K openly admitted to their emotionally abusive behavior toward S, without even denying it. K is just repeating R’s pattern—when the situation favors them, they immediately cover up their own mistakes, shifting the blame onto others.

When I saw K’s statement and left a comment under it, K did not address my questions directly. Just like R What did before, they deleted the post（The post has now been resumed.）pretending nothing happened. What’s even more laughable is that K, unable to respond to my comment, simply deleted the entire post. If you were truly as innocent as you claim, why wouldn’t you dare to reply? This only proves that you are not the wrongly accused victim your statement made you out to be.I didn’t fully screenshot my comment, so here’s the missing part:

“K, stop running away and apologize to our PJA and the Cuphead Parents artists. This is not slander — because in June, you admitted this behavior yourself. And you know very well that hiding your love for a ship they despise is a mistake you can’t escape from. Your current art style is built on imitating a style that PJA has explicitly forbidden copying. You need to face your own mistakes instead of, like R, erasing them once the situation is under your control and lying firmly that you did nothing wrong.”

At the same time, K has never apologized for deceiving PJA and the other Cuphead Parents artists. K has also never apologized for imitating the art style that PJA explicitly forbade copying.（All of the following images are from R’s previous posts.And according to R’s screenshots, K once used someone else’s OC for “practice” without their permission.）

R has actively stepped forward and taken responsibility for all of the mistakes she made, and, just as she promised K at the time, has never disturbed K’s life again. However, K keeps bringing up R’s past actions, avoiding responsibility for their own issues.

I can't put any more pictures. Please move to the comment area under K's statement.

K has now issued yet another statement, but still has not provided a satisfactory resolution.

K, your statement still has serious problems.

1. Deflecting blame onto R

You spent most of your statement focusing on R’s actions. But R’s mistakes do not erase your own. You cannot keep using R as a shield to avoid taking responsibility for yourself.

And R has already deleted that post and handled her mistakes with a positive and constructive attitude. I’ve repeated this to you many times, yet you still refuse to acknowledge it. You keep using her past mistakes as a shield, while never once mentioning that R has already publicly apologized to you on Chinese social media and in multiple groups.

Including the fact that R kept her promise to you and spent an entire night carefully transferring all of S’s previous works for you!

2. Whitewashing and minimizing your behavior

You described your treatment of S as merely “emotional avoidance.” But S’s diary clearly documented emotional abuse and differential treatment. Reframing it with softer words only makes you look harmless at S’s expense. That is disrespectful to him.

3. Making excuses again

You admitted lying to PJA and others, but excused it as “fear of exclusion.” Fear is not a justification for deception. Using excuses to gloss over wrongdoing makes your so-called apology sound even more insincere.

And you still haven’t explained why you used someone else’s OC for “practice” without their permission.

4. Ignoring the core issues

• You did not address the accusations of copying PJA’s art style, which was explicitly forbidden.

• You did not respond to the criticism of disrespecting your collaborator D.

By selectively ignoring these, you show that you have no genuine intention of taking responsibility.

5. Empty promises

You say you “hope to re-engage sincerely in the future,” but that is just pretty wording. Real sincerity requires concrete actions—such as publicly apologizing to the people you deceived and hurt, and promising to stop imitating a forbidden style. Without actions, your promises are meaningless.

Conclusion:

K, your revised statement is not true reflection—it is evasion. You are trying to whitewash yourself by deflecting, minimizing, making excuses, and avoiding the real issues. If you truly want to regain trust, you need to take visible, concrete actions, not keep hiding behind empty words.

STOP RUNNING AWAY.

We do not welcome cowards and liars like you in our community.

Sept. 17th

After I left another comment asking K to correct her post, K once again modified her statement. The post has now removed references to R’s past actions, making it appear as though the matter was already resolved with a public apology.

However, this latest “apology” is even more unacceptable and impossible to forgive. Below are K’s newly revised statement from today, along with my comment.

So this is all you have to say about R?That's your attitude? Just one sentence, as if her efforts meant nothing?

R openly apologized on domestic social media and in multiple groups, she faced her mistakes head-on, and even stayed up all night to help you transfer S’s works. And yet, you reduce all of that to a single line? That’s not acknowledgment—that’s evasion.

It’s obvious you’re deliberately downplaying R’s courage and actions, just so you can keep her as your scapegoat. Meanwhile, you still haven’t taken full responsibility for your own lies and avoidance.

(On Chinese social media platforms, everything regarding R, K, and the others has already settled. K and those who were once hurt by R have never brought it up again. Therefore, I will not be sharing any screenshots of R’s public apology on Chinese media here.)

(However, after R had already ended everything, when she completely stepped out of her life, K once again stirred up a one-sided narrative on Tumblr without reason, directing her followers to hate R. Just like how she once deceived other artists—she is once again trying to conceal her own shameful side and escape accountability.)

It’s honestly disappointing to see how K addressed R. After everything R went through—openly apologizing on domestic platforms, facing her mistakes directly, even staying up late to help transfer S’s works—K reduces it all to a single line.

Compare that with R’s actions: R owned up to her faults, admitted her wrongdoings, and made concrete efforts to repair the damage. K, on the other hand, still avoids responsibility for her own lies and keeps shifting focus back onto R.

I think anyone looking at this can see the difference in attitude. One person faced her problems head-on; the other continues to hide behind empty words.

Judging right and wrong is not just about “who made mistakes in the past,” but more importantly about “who actively addresses and takes responsibility for their actions afterward.”

Although R once committed extremely serious and unforgivable mistakes—towards K, S, and other members of the Cuphead community—she has been actively working to correct her problems:

1. Public acknowledgment and apology

• R publicly admitted her mistakes on Chinese social media and multiple groups, without hiding her wrongdoing.

• She faced pressure and criticism from the community and individuals and actively took responsibility, showing she genuinely understood her mistakes.

2. Keeping promises and taking real action

• R honored her commitment to K, staying up late to organize and transfer S’s past works, ensuring K could preserve them.

• After handling these matters, R completely exited K’s life and did not disturb her again.

3. Her proactive attitude deserves recognition

• Although R’s past actions caused harm to many, her attitude and actions demonstrate courage and responsibility, which should be acknowledged.

However, after R had fully addressed the issues, deleted all posts related to K, and left the internet, K once again stirred up drama on Tumblr, attempting to make uninformed people hate R:

• K concealed R’s efforts and public apologies, completely ignoring the truth of what R had done to make amends.

• K repeatedly claims she will confront her issues, yet in reality, she only speaks empty words and has not taken any actual responsibility.

• This behavior mirrors R’s past misconduct: manipulating public opinion to evade responsibility and shifting blame onto others.

We cannot just focus on R’s past mistakes while ignoring her efforts to resolve the issues. While K is a victim, her post-event actions—concealing facts, stirring public emotions, and refusing to acknowledge R’s efforts—are truly infuriating and unforgivable. Even if R had previously treated K unfairly, that does not justify K repeating the same kind of misconduct.

At the same time, I have serious doubts about K’s latest post. It strongly appears to be AI-generated, because it does not resemble her previous writing style or tone. The entire statement leans heavily on abstract and lofty terms, such as “ethics” and “morality.” Anyone can talk about these grand principles, but that doesn’t demonstrate actual accountability or concrete action.I have repeatedly asked K in the comments to provide specific, actionable steps she plans to take to make amends—but she refused to respond. Even in her latest update, she fails to clarify her practical plan or actual actions. I also questioned in her comment section whether this statement was AI-generated, and she still refused to reply.

This pattern makes it clear that, despite her words about “facing her mistakes,” she is still avoiding genuine accountability. She can talk all she wants about ethics or responsibility, but without concrete actions, it’s just empty talk—and that is something no one can reasonably defend.

In the end, I want everyone to see one undeniable fact:

Although R once made extremely serious mistakes, she has already issued public apologies, actively worked to make amends, and completely stepped out of K’s life. Yet K, after everything had already settled, chose to stir up the issue again—directing all the blame back onto R—while never once addressing her own real problems.What makes this even harder to accept is that K’s so-called “public statement” appears suspiciously AI-generated. It is filled with lofty, abstract words—such as “ethics” and “morality”—yet it never offers any concrete actions or solutions. I raised this concern multiple times in her comment section, but she repeatedly refused to respond. Even in her most recent update, she still avoided giving any clear explanation.

Judging right from wrong is not only about who made mistakes in the past—it is about who has shown accountability and responsibility afterward. R chose to face her mistakes and take responsibility. K chose to obscure, deflect, and avoid.

I hope everyone who reads this will stay clear-eyed and not be misled by hollow words dressed up to sound profound. The ones who deserve respect are those who confront their mistakes with courage and truly change—not those who hide behind empty statements to escape responsibility.

K, I have reminded you countless times, patiently pointing out how you should face the problems and take responsibility. Yet again and again, you chose evasion—hiding behind empty words instead of taking real action.

Let me be clear: I am not your parent, nor am I your teacher. I have no obligation to repeatedly instruct you on how to be accountable or how to correct yourself. Your so-called “reflection” and “correction” mean nothing if they only exist in your posts and words, without any concrete action to support them.

You must truly understand where you went wrong. You must truly understand that correction can only be proven through real, tangible actions—not through vague statements designed to cover things up.

So let me make this very clear: I will not delete this post. The truth must remain visible for everyone to see. Any attempt to evade, conceal, or shift the blame will only make you appear even more insincere in the eyes of others.

Even if K brings others to defend her, the facts speak for themselves. This discussion is not about who did what in the past, but about how each person handled their mistakes afterward. R made serious mistakes, but she faced them head-on, publicly apologized on multiple platforms, and fully removed herself from K’s life—never causing further harm.

K, on the other hand, has repeatedly avoided taking responsibility for her own actions, hidden R’s efforts, and stirred negative emotions online despite the matter having been resolved. The focus here is on accountability, honesty, and integrity—not gossip or past errors. Anyone evaluating this situation rationally can see who is actively trying to fix things and who continues to evade responsibility.

Your previous mistakes or R’s past errors do not justify repeating the same harmful patterns. This is about your current behavior and whether you are willing to genuinely take responsibility.

Sept. 22nd

Several days have passed — and unlike before, when K would immediately edit her posts the very next day, this time she has done nothing.

• K has never issued a clear apology for deliberately reigniting hatred toward R on Tumblr.

• K has never responded to repeated questions about whether her statement was AI-generated.

• K has never provided any concrete actions or remedial steps — despite publicly promising she would “face problems head-on.”

These are not opinions. They are observable facts. Anyone can see her post remains unchanged（It has remained the same as on September 17th.）, her replies absent, and her promises unfulfilled.

When someone who once rushed to respond suddenly chooses silence, the reason is obvious: she has no explanation left.

And silence is not accountability. Silence is complicity.

The longer this continues, the clearer it becomes — K is not committed to honesty or responsibility. What she shows is not growth, but performance.

So please, don’t take her vague statements at face value. Look at her actions — or rather, her lack of them. That alone speaks louder than any excuse she might try to give.

Faced with clear facts and evidence, K chose silence, evasion, and concealment, completely shirking her responsibility. She not only disregarded the efforts R made to resolve the situation, but also ignored the responsibility she herself should bear in the matter. Anyone trying to defend her must understand—supporting someone who avoids responsibility and refuses to respond to the facts only encourages dishonesty and irresponsibility. In contrast, even though R committed serious mistakes, she courageously faced them, actively corrected her actions, publicly apologized, and completely withdrew from affecting others’ lives. This courage and sense of responsibility deserve recognition. Every member of the community should judge based on facts, rather than being misled by empty words and evasive behavior.

It is worth noting that K repeatedly claimed she would never avoid responsibility like before and that she would acknowledge all her mistakes. Yet her so-called “acknowledgment” remains vague, fails to address key issues, and she has even chosen to remain silent for several days, seemingly doing nothing –This stark contrast between her promises and actual behavior not only calls her sincerity into question, but also exposes the performative and evasive nature of her approach to accountability.

In a community built on trust, responsibility, and respect for others’ work, those who repeatedly avoid accountability, mislead others, and disrupt the environment naturally struggle to maintain credibility or constructive participation. The community will naturally support those who take responsibility and actively make amends, while keeping distance from repeated deception is both respectful and protective of the creative environment.

In other words, those who continue to cause turmoil and refuse to confront their own actions, no matter how talented they may be, will inevitably struggle to occupy a meaningful position here. The community thrives on respect, integrity, and responsibility — not on tolerating repeated misdirection and evasion.

K’s behavior demonstrates that she does not meet the basic standards of responsibility and cooperation expected within the community. Any member who truly cares about the community will naturally keep their distance from such conduct. Facts speak for themselves — the outcome is already clear.

2026 Jan. 6th

K has now deleted the post involving R and resumed posting new work, while continuing to offer no clarification, response, or accountability.Deletion and silence do not undo harm.They do not address the damage caused, nor do they acknowledge the people affected.Erasing posts does not erase facts.Disappearing from the discussion does not equal closure for those harmed.This update is not speculation. It is a record of what has — and has not — been done.

#call out post #cuphead parents #eli amida #vickers chapuk