The Very Worst, Most Injurious and Dangerous Method That Could Be Used
22 JUL 1885. Austin Daily Statesman.
CITY SEWERAGE. Dr. Burt Offers Some Sanitary Suggestions to the Council.
The following paper written by Dr. W.J. Burt, city hospital officer, is offered to the city council of Austin for their consideration. The paper contains some very valuable suggestions, which cannot fail to be read with interest:
Gentlemen - Probably the most important question with sanitarians of the present day, it's how to dispose of the sewage of cities, so as to keep the air, water and so free from contamination. This is a vital question to the city of Austin for in it is the issues of life and death. As the city increases in population and becomes more thickly settled, the greater the reason for removing everything, as far as possible that will contaminate air, water or soil and so remove to a great extent at least, the causes of infectious and preventable diseases. While there are many questions to consider, of minor importance, in reference to the sanitary and hygienic condition, the most important one beyond all cavil, is the proper disposition of the human dejecta of the city. A just conception of the magnitude of this subject depends largely upon proper knowledge of the amount of excrements to be disposed of. Dr. J.C. Dalton, a noted physiologist and chemist, estimates the daily average amount for the entire population of a city at 2 1/2 to 3 ounces of foecal and 40 ounces of urinary discharges for one person. Estimating the population of Austin at 20,000 persons this would give us 3,120 ounces daily or the grand total amount of 500 tons of foecal deposits. And 40 ounces of urine daily for one person would give us for Austin 5,200 gallons for one day -- or 1,825,000 gallons or 45,625 barrels for one year. This is no imaginary mathematical calculation. It is a stern fact and one of such magnitude as to startle the observing and inquiring investigator.
You see that the disposal of so vast an amount of human excreta even for one year is a measure of great importance, but the proper disposition so as to prevent the air, water and soil from being filled with the noxious gases and impurities is one vital to every citizen.
It is an admitted fact from every sanitary and hygienic point that these excreta should be disinfected and removed speedily from inhabited houses. The question of its proper disposal, (of the best, safest and most economic disposal), so as to secure the very best possible hygienic conditions is the question to be settled, not in fine spun theories, but practically in a manner to secure the best possible results. It is not necessary to go into the details of a long discussion of the many methods used over the civilized world. For our purposes they may be practically reduced to two methods or classes: 1st. The dry method. 2nd. The sewer or water system.
The dry method has many modifications, only two of them are practiced here, one the vault system, and the other the commode or box system, known as Moule’s method.
The vault system as practiced now in Austin, to receive the 500 tons of fecal and 45,000 barrels of urinary discharges annually, it's probably the very worst, most injurious and dangerous method that could be used. It is true of all conceals the deposits from public view, but in it's dark recesses, decomposition goes on, developing poisonous and a fifth of gases, and becomes the matrix for developing organic charms of almost every species, from the minutest bacillus to the largest and most insatiate micrococcus that may infest our bodies and destroy them.
Then what shall we do with the vault system? I would say, either abolish it all together or if vaults are to be used have them well cemented, to prevent the liquid portions permeating and contaminating the soil and water, and have them daily disinfected by quick lime or dry pulverized earth, or both.
The box or mole system is the better of the two. This consists, briefly stated, of properly made boxes or commodes for each closet, for the reception and disinfection of all ejecta. If the system is properly used, and the contents of the boxes were disinfected daily with dry dust or quick lime, and then removed once or twice a month, there would be but little complaint of the sanitary condition of the city from this cause.
The second method mentioned for removal of these accumulations is by a properly arranged system of sewers and plenty of fresh water for flushing purposes. This system, when practical, is to all intents and purposes, the best means for removing and disposing of all kinds of sewerage.
Can this system be adopted in the city of Austin? Without going into any details, showing its practicability, I will say that I believe a system of sewers for all the central portions of the city should be at once established, and every residence and business house within reach of it should be connected with it. No other means would be so satisfactory -- no other means or methods will effectually place out beautiful city in a good hygienic and sanitary condition.
Yours respectfully, W.J. Burt, M.D.