Lula is Haddad. Haddad is Lula. Haddad is the people.
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Belgium
seen from South Africa

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands

seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from T1

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada

seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Israel
seen from United States

seen from United States
Lula is Haddad. Haddad is Lula. Haddad is the people.
There is little pretense that the court will be impartial in Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s trial.
I said to myself I wouldn't care anymore what happens here since I intend to leave, but still it will take a while before I’m able to do so, so I think this shit will affect me anyway.
Just my commentary on the aftermath of the judgment occurring today and Lula in general:
Eduardo Suplicy e José Dirceu
We will defeat facism.
Lula em São Miguel das Missões, Rio Grande do Sul, com Dona Marisa e Olívio Dutra, em uma das “Caravanas da Cidadania”, na década de 90. Lula in São Miguel das Missões, Rio Grande do Sul, alongside his late wife Dona Marisa and Rio Grande do Sul former governor Olívio Dutra, at one of the “Citizenship Caravans”, in the 90′s.
I'm legit asking on here having actually gone through the process of how electoral politics works, including and especially canvassing, and candidate selection, how much disaffection and local resentment can play in deciding an sway an election, and how a very media-savvy charismatic candidate saying the right keypoints around a constituency, particularly one that's really deprived and one of many regions which experiend the brunt of deindustrialisation.
Like, I want people to really think about what happened during the rochdale by-election and why the result happened. This was a by-election where:
We had three candidates who were had either been Labour MPs at one point, or within the party machine only to fall into disfavor - including within the by-election itself.
Speaking of the Labour candidate, the reason why he fell into disfavour despite up until that point being a 'company man' is that he said in an event that the October 7 events happened with Israel's foreknowledge. Saying that like that on its own whether it's true or not (it isn't) is deeply embarassing for Labour which is committed to supporting Israel, and weaponised antisemitism to clear out/suppress its left-wing - especially if you can't switch out a new candidate in time.
The Green Party candidate was found to have posted Islamophobic remarks years before and also had to stop campaigning, and likewise, the Green Party couldn't change their candidate cos it was too late.
The local Labour branch quietly mouthed support for someone booted out of their tribe: Simon Dancuzk, a nasty dude selected for the Reform Party, a metamorphosed UKIP - who basically was only out because he was sexxting an underage girl - all to keep out Galloway. Yes, Labour was banking on a sex pest that they booted out to keep out a political nemesis.
A well-known vehicle shop owner presumably with his own money, was able to get out his messaging better than the establishment candidates, and was rewarded in the by-election with second-place.
Yes, Galloway is a vain, chauvinistic blowhard but he understands what the miasma of labourism in dissaffected areas does, and that's basically why the Worker's Party basically exists - Galloway also happens to legitimately hate Britain's foreign policy in the Middle East, something that will bring the support of the Muslim base. They're not going to care about that time he pretended to be a cat on big brother twenty years ago, if right now he's saying what Labour and the Tories won't say - that what's happening in Gaza is a genocide conducted by Israel with the material support of the British government. Labour is pissed as the main opposition not because they actually think Galloway's an antisemite, but because he represents the very real possibility that they could leak blocs of so-called 'natural voters' to independent candidates just when they thought they had a tight election program, and Galloway's gonna be slamming them from the left, which the Tories may capitalise on. They'll blame Galloway but they honestly it is no-one but themselves that they should blame.
So that's the rub. It's amazing that after ten years of shit like this going back to the Scottish referendum, nobody seems to have lerned anything, and on here what comes out is this moralistic chastising. It's not about whether what happened is 'good', it's about understand the conditions for why it happened, and why things like it will happen again.
“Le parti ouvrier est opposé au changement du prix des billets,” La Presse. May 11, 1931. Page 09. ---- Le conseil de Montréal du parti ouvrier canadien a tenu son assemblée mensuelle, hier matin, à l'hôtel Mont-Royal, sous la présidence de M. J. Cupello. Une cinquantaine de délégués assistalent à cette réunion qui fut très animée. Plusieurs résolutions de le haute importance furent adoptes, après une longue discussion, ontre autres celle de l’échevln Schubert condamnant le changement projeté par la compagnie des tramways de Montréal dans le prix de ses billets. “Ce n'est qu'une manière déguisêe de hausser les prix,’ déclara-t-il, caractérisant ainsi le projet de faire payer dix sous au lieu de sept, Ci ceux qui paient argent comptant durant le Jour au lieu d’employer des billets de tramway, et d'étendre le privilège d’employer les billets durant la nuit au lieu d'exiger dix sous de ceux qui voyagent après minuit. “La compagnie, dit-il, n’a pas pensé à un tel changement sans avoir l’intention de faire un profit. Le projet tel qu’il est, parait favoriser la classe ouvrière, mais un examen attentif démontre qu’au contraire, c’est le pauvre qui devra payer la majeure partie de ces trois sous additionnels ou être forcé de s'approvisionner de billets qu’il dépensera le plus tôt possible’'. Cest l’ouvrier qui paiera “Car, ajouta-t-il, c’eet un fait que, lorsqu’un citoyen a des billets le tramway dans ses pochen, il les emploie. C’est, une habitude de prendre le tramway lorsqu’on a des billets. Et le nouveau projet ne fera qu’accentuer oette inclination de la part des citoyens, en les forçant à acheter des billets, chaque fols qu’ils embarqueront dans le tramway”. A ceux qui croient que le changement projeté profitera aux voyageurs de nuit, l’échevin Schubert déclare que la plupart de ceux qui prennent le tramway après minuit, sont des habitués des théâtres ou des cabarets de nuit et qu’ils peuvent facilement payer trois sous additionnels. Dans son opinion c’est l’ouvrier et le touriste qui vont, avoir le plus à souffrir du nouveau projet. “Ce n’est pas le riche qui voyage en limousine” qui paiera ces troie sous additionnels”, déclara-t-il, au milieu des applaudissements, Une autre résolution a aurei été adoptée, approuvant la proposition de certains membres du parti ouvrier des Communes, au sujet du Statut de la sédition, de l’établissement d’un Conseil économique national, et de l’assurance d’état contre le chômage.
“Members Of March 14 Mob Being Punished,” The Porcupine Advance (Timmins). April 3, 1918. Page 01. --- The chief item of business before Magistrate Atkinson at Thursday’s police court was the trial of eight Russians charged with unlawfully taking part in the disorderly assembly here on March 14th, when three or four hundred foreigners first paraded through the streets and then gathered at the jail here demanding the release of the alleged orator, Consovitch, now awaiting trial on a charge of making seditious utterances. Some of the Russians charged under the town bylaws Thursday claimed that they had meant no harm but had just stopped to see what the crowd was all about. Chief Clark, however, pointed out that the crowd had been asked to disperse both by the police and the Mayor and that all staying had aided in making the trouble. He also was able to single out there or four of the men as ringleaders in the agitation. Officer R. Allen and Constable Greer also gave evidence against some of the accused, Officer Allen, however, pointing out that the accused, Cherinsky, had given the police assistance in the way of interpreting and in reasoning with the mob. This was counted in Cherinsky’s favor and he was allowed to go on suspended sentence. Tom Stelmuk failed to appear to answer to the charge and his bail of $50 was entreated. Steve Berlinski, Mike Kareb and Nik Dechutzik were sent to jail for 21 days each in default of fines of $50 apiece. Tom Kuzmik, Saval Proux, Harry Laluk, and Mike Leguin were each fined $20 and costs. Berlinski, Kareh and Deehutzik were taken down on Friday morning by Constable Greer to serve their terms. Chief Clark has the names of a number of others who will be tried on the same charges. It is intention to punish all who took part in the disorder and every alien in the crowd will eventually be tried.
Chief Clark had John Harmon, an Austrian, before the Magistrate, for not reporting. A fine of $25 and costs was imposed.
Provincial Officer Ackroyd’s charge preferred against Harry Johnstone for being intoxicated in a public place was remanded for a week.