Bringing Community Voices to the Table
Here are some findings from a focus group held in San Jose, CA and related to an earlier post I did on La Mesa Verde Gardens. The focus group was held to gather information about food access and healthy eating in the city. Below is a list of things they learned:
Twice as many large supermarkets in higher-income areas than lower-income communities.
On a per-capita basis, higher-income areas have 2.4 times as many larger supermarkets than lower-income areas.
Lower-income areas have nearly twice as many liquor stores and 50% more “meat” markets than higher-income areas.
On average, higher-income areas have twice as many locations with fresh fruits and vegetables compared to lower-income areas.
Higher-income areas have 14 times more locations with frozen fruit and six times more locations with frozen vegetables than lower-income areas.
Access to organic fruits and vegetables is almost non-existent in lower-income areas.
In lower-income areas, much of the fresh and canned produce was not marked (no prices).
“Meat” alternatives were only available in 2% of the locations surveyed in lower-income areas compared to 22% in higher-income areas.
Vegan dairy alternatives were only available in 1% of the lower-income locations compared to 21% in higher-income locations.
The last bullet point is a problem because according to the USDA Department of Health and Human Services, 95 percent of Asians, 60 percent to 80 percent of African Americans and Ashkenazi Jews, 80 percent to 100 percent of American Indians, and 50 to 80 percent of Latinos are lactose intolerant. Meaning they don't have the enzyme needed to break down lactose, a major disaccharide in milk products.
Also included in the report are some recommendations that the city could implement or promote to address some of the above issues:
The City should work to create more community gardens that are open to the public and serve those communities most impacted by lack of access to fresh fruits and vegetables.
The concept of trueque, which showed that communities are grounded in social expectations of reciprocity and mutuality, should be highlighted as a community value and could be promoted as one of the solutions.
Cooking classes to teach participants how to cook with fruits and vegetables and vegan foods, where they can also share healthy recipes.
La Mesa Verde’s program seemed to be a true success with those who were involved. Not only did the program allow participants to grow their own food, it offered nutrition classes that people enjoyed and learned from.
Information on the term organic that is bilingual and culturally sensitive. It should include information on the chemicals as well as impacts on farm workers.
Information on the farmers’ markets in the areas should give the times and be bilingual. We would also suggest that those wanting to bring a farmers’ market to impacted communities should survey the community to ensure they are finding the best location, days, and times.
Schools should be encouraged to talk with students’ parents about health issues and healthy eating.
Educate WIC employees and others providing such services on healthy eating and, if children are vegan, how to respect their diet. Given that milk is promoted so heavily in government-funded programs, employees of those programs should receive education regarding lactose intolerance.
One of the recommendations we made proved to be unacceptable by the participants in our focus groups. We had discussed a new program in Baltimore where participants could order their groceries online and pick them up at a local library. However, when asked if they would use this type of program, many respondents shared the sentiment that, “I want to see the food, touch it, smell it.”
These are some great ideas that could be useful in many communities with food access and food security issues.
http://www.foodispower.org
http://www.foodispower.org/wp-content/uploads/FEP_community_voices_report.pdf