remember when nickelodeon picked the worst possible name for their halloween sweepstakes

@theartofmadeline

if i look back, i am lost

Discoholic 🪩
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Origami Around
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Show & Tell

oozey mess

Love Begins
No title available
hello vonnie
Game of Thrones Daily
NASA

No title available
KIROKAZE

Andulka

shark vs the universe

JVL
Today's Document
Xuebing Du

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Türkiye

seen from Ukraine

seen from Egypt

seen from Brazil
@thegreatbarrier-reefer
remember when nickelodeon picked the worst possible name for their halloween sweepstakes
Magical Journey through Paradise.
New research shows 0.6% of rape allegations are false.
and for those interested, you can find the report HERE
Just in case any dudebros are unclear on what this means: it means that your buddy who totally just had some bitch trying to ruin his life by accusing him of rape…almost certainly actually did rape her.
Just keep that in mind.
Ok but where was this study performed? Who were the test subjects? How many of them were there? There is no possible way that someone could comprise this simple of a figure and have it be accurate everywhere in the world, even in North America alone it would probably be nearly impossible to compile such a number without decades of research and a lot of money wasted on polygraph tests only to come up with a subjective result that will change drastically over time. Not to mention this isn't even clear as to what is construed as rape, so does this study apply only to forceful and unconsenting sex, or sexual coercion, or drugging and raping, and is molestation considered rape or does it only include penetrative sex?? Like this is so stupid why is anyone reblogging this and assuming it's true. Didn't PB & J teach y'all anything about using your noodles?
yea sex is pretty good but have u ever taken a nap with someone
yeah, after sex
My mum didn’t know it was a TV show and she freaked out when she saw me googling ‘How To Get Away With Murder’
Long story short, she called the whole family round and gave us the standard ‘murder will not be tolerated in this family’ lecture
I WILL REBLOG THIS UNTIL I DIE
Marilyn Manson speech on blame.
Now you know the formula…
http://goo.gl/9whpdt
Warning Signs of Satanic Behavior. Training video for police, 1990
Le forze primordiali
WHOA WHOA WHOA. excuse me. But the minimum wage is set for teenagers with first jobs/ college students TO GET EXPERIENCE. Because a higher paying job isn’t going to higher you unless ypu have experience. AND YOU GET THAT EXPERIENCE BY WORKING AT MINIMUM PAYING JOBS. and the higher paying jobs are harder jobs which is why they get more money. If you raise the minimum wage, then companies wont have the money to pay more employees so they look for the people with the most experience… So if companies can only higher people with experience and you dont have any because companies DONT HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY YOU?? well then you are never going to get a job. And when the minimum wage goes up, the price of everything goes up. And then we have the minimum wage earners complaining again. So stop saying that the minimum wage needs to be raised because it doesnt. What needs to happen is we need a better economy and thanks to obama, thats not going to happen for a while because obama doesn’t know what hes doing. So if you want to make more money, get experience and a better paying job.
You’re a shitty economist buddy.
Less than 15% of minimum wage worker’s are teenagers (age 14-19), the rest are adults aged 20 and over (85.7%). So lets stop pretending that these jobs are meant for students. The economy is shit and unfortunately, people have to settle for low wages because the alternative often is unemployment.
Higher paying jobs doesn’t equate to ‘harder jobs’. Often, the higher a position is, the less labor you are required to do.
"And when the minimum wage goes up, the price of everything goes up."
Inflation doesn’t necessarily work that way. Obviously, you’re just regurgitating the bullshit theories conservatives spew out while disregarding the statistics and history that proves otherwise. But since you’re using that argument, why not raise the minimum wage with the rise of inflation? Or productivity even?
If we had raised the minimum wage with the rise of productivity since 1968, it would currently be $21.72. In other words, we are creating far more and producing more profit for corporations, while being paid for a third of what we use to.
What do you have to say about that?
And raising the minimum wage to $10.10 will raise 1.7 million families out of poverty and reduce the need for them to use public assistance, saving the federal government $7.6 billion per year. Would you say you’re you against that?
The current federal minimum wage is $7.25. In none of the 50 states is that enough money to pay the average rent for a 2-bedroom apartment.
The minimum wage used to be able to keep a family of 3 above the poverty line. Now, the minimum wage can’t even keep a single parent working 40 hours a week, for an entire year without a single day off, above the poverty line.
When you raise the minimum wage, you’re putting more money into the pockets of the lower/working class. Their money is directly put back into the economy when the buy food, pay bills and generally spend their money. As oppose to higher paid people who have the luxury of saving their earnings. That means that businesses will generally make more money because the working class has more money to spend.
That’s my argument for raising the minimum wage, I would love to see your attempt to counter it.
An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it.
Jeff Mallett (via whats-out-there)
Luigi Veronesi (Italian, 1908-1998), Senza titolo, 1936. Ink on paper, 20 x 26.8 cm.