Rules of Nature #3
ojovivo
will byers stan first human second

Discoholic šŖ©

ā
No title available
Claire Keane

titsay
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
Cosmic Funnies

Origami Around
Game of Thrones Daily

oozey mess

izzy's playlists!
I'd rather be in outer space šø

shark vs the universe

Andulka

JBB: An Artblog!
trying on a metaphor

Janaina Medeiros
d e v o n
seen from United States

seen from Spain

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Russia

seen from India

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from France
seen from Sweden

seen from Türkiye
seen from Sweden

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
@theideacounter
Rules of Nature #3
The Structure of Story now available! Check it out on Amazon, via the link in our bio, or at https://kiingo.co/book
.
.
.
Sometimes a story just isn't working. And in that case, we can ask ourselves a few questions. There's nothing groundbreaking in these questions but if you're having troubles, consider the following:
⢠What does your protagonist want? In other words, what do they think would make them happy?
⢠What's your protagonist's plan to get what they think will make them happy? If they have no plan to attain it, chances are it's too abstract. The trouble with an abstract goal is that it doesn't generate tension because abstract goals cannot be meaningfully opposed (and thus no uncertainty is generated).
⢠Who or what will stand in the way of your protagonist getting what they want (whether intentionally or unintentionally)?
⢠If the opposition to your protagonist's goal is another character, what's their plan to oppose the protagonist? If they don't have a plan, chances are that they don't provide meaningful opposition and thus you may have trouble maintaining conflict throughout the story.
⢠What happens if your protagonist doesn't get what they want? What thing of value is at stake in their pursuit?
⢠Have you shown the audience how much the protagonist cares for the thing of value that's at stake?
⢠Why does the protagonist need to take action toward the thing they want now rather than later? Why can't they just walk away?
⢠Why are we interested in spending time with your protagonist? They don't need to be "nice" or sympathetic, but they do need to be *interesting*. What makes us want to find out what they're going to do next? (This is where our empathy techniques come in).
⢠Your protagonist has a belief that once they do, have, or become something, they'll finally be happy. Is that actually true? If not, what will actually bring them happiness? What will trigger this realization?
⢠What difficult decision will your protagonist need to make at the climax of the story? This may be a choice between what they originally *thought* would bring them happiness and what will *actually* bring them happiness.
⢠If you're ever having troubles with your plot, chances are that your protagonist's plan isn't clear enough or the plan of your story's opposition (i.e. antagonist) isn't clear enough. Come back to the plans and make sure they're opposed.
Sometimes a story just isn't working. And in that case, we can ask ourselves a few questions. There's nothing groundbreaking here but if you
ughhhhhhhhh noooo stop it! aha! donāt release non-native earthworms in random plots of soil for enhancing gardens or free bait, donāt do it anywhere in North America lmaoooo! stop, itās so dangerous and extremely harmful, with devastating and surprisingly dramatic and visible biome-wide effects! haha popular tumblr blogs should stop repeatedly and widely sharing advice recommending the release of non-native earthworms and calling it āanti-imperialist praxisā and ābioregional autonomyā and āvegan self-suffiencyā lol! dooooonāt! it straight up destroys soil and outright kills forests :/ it directly causes death of understory plants; death of iconic species like goblin fern and serviceberry; elimination of vital fungal networks providing both soil structure and tree-to-tree nutrient-sharing; loss of native invertebrates and amphibians; savannification of the boundary between woodland and tallgrass prairie; death of red maple, sugar maple, and red oak stands; and especially harms hardwoods forests of the Great Lakes and Midwest lmao seriously stooooop it >:(
Anyway for real, I sure hope no one is deliberately releasing non-native and invasive earthworms, or bait worms, anywhere on Turtle Island/North American land, especially west of the Mississippi River or north of the Wisconsin glaciation. Earthworms and bait worms sold in stores are, by and large, not species native to the continent. They severely harm forests and soil ecology, leading directly to disruption of fungal networks; death of saplings and seedlings; death of forest understory plants; replacement of typical understory species with grasses; mortality in adult trees, as well; changes in pH; and other harm, especially devastating in northern hardwoods forests of the Great Lakes region.
Not gonna name names, but several times this year, popular blogs from the [forest-lover, anarchist/leftist/solarpunk, Moomin-fan, environmentalist-ish] realms of Tumblr have widely shared advice recommending the release of non-native earthworms or bait worms into the wild, as a form of āpraxisā. Iāve got these posts screenshotted, but since I generally respect people in these circles - and in the interest of avoiding discourse and drama - Iām not going to share them. (A popular post was widely shared in February 2019; another ārelease store-bought earthwormsā post was shared in December 2019.) I appreciate where their hearts are at. But:
Source: [x].
Some things:
From a Phys dot org summary of Great Lakes Worm Watch:
āThe western Great Lakes region, which is the area weāre focused on, has no native earthworms,ā says ecologist Cindy Hale, a research associate with the Natural Resources Research Institute at the University of Minnesota in Duluth. Native earthworms in the region were all wiped out after the last Ice Age. The current population was brought by Europeans hundreds of years ago, (soil was often used as ballast in ships) and theyāre now changing the face of local forests. Anglers are adding to the problem by dumping worms that donāt end up on the end of a hook.
With support from the National Science Foundation (NSF), Haleās team created the Great Lakes Worm Watch website and outreach programs to stop the spread of non-native earthworms and to clear up the common misconception that theyāre harmless. [ā¦] Earthworms may be small but when they take over a forest, the impact is dramatic. They cause the rapid incorporation of organic material into the soil, changing its structure, chemistry and nutrient dynamics. Whatās known as the duff layer is suddenly removed, and this duff, or decaying organic material on the forest floor, is habitat for several species of insects, spiders, small vertebrates, bacteria and fungi. It is also the primary rooting zone for most plants.āWhatās really the biggest negative effect on the plants directly is the removal of their rooting zone. It can cause mortality of adult plants but, furthermore, it can cause a loss of reproductive potential. A lot of these native plants have seeds that have very complex seed dormancy and germination strategies,ā says Hale.
ā
Caption by Shireen Gonzaga for EarthSky: āA forest understory with a high diversity of native plants, the result when there are no earthworms in the soil. Image courtesy of Paul Ojanen.ā
Caption by Shireen Gonzaga for EarthSky: āForest soil with an abundance of non-native earthworms can result in a bare understory. Image courtesy of Scott L Loss.ā
Non-native worms disrupt fungi networks, alter soil pH, damage seedlings, and allow grasses to gain stronger footholds to replace native/natural forest understory plants (from an EarthSky review of 2016 research by German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research):
Bottom line: European earthworms, introduced by early settlers, are changing the physical and chemical characteristics of soil in northern North American forests, creating a decreased diversity in native plants. [ā¦] At the top soil layer, earthworms convert fallen leaves to humus. Thatās a good thing if youāre growing a garden, but, in a natural forest, it causes a fast-tracking of the release of nutrients instead of allowing the leaf litter to break down more slowly, as it would without the earthworms.
Also, as they burrow through the ground, earthworms disrupt the mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship between fungi and plants. Some deep-burrowing worm species change the pH of upper soil layers by mixing in alkaline soil from deeper in the ground. [ā¦]
All of these changes adversely affect native plants that did not evolve in such conditions. For instance, the goblin fern is rarely found in areas with high earthworm density. Other native plants facing threats include largeflower bellwort, trillium and Solomonās seal. Earthworms also consume the seeds and seedlings of some plant species, influencing what grows in the forest understory.
In some locations, grasses, with their fine root systems that quickly absorb nutrients, dominate the forest floor. Non-native invasive plants that evolved in soils containing earthworms gain an even stronger foothold in these forests.
ā
Cindy Hale, the prominent University of Minnesota-based researcher of non-native earthworms in the Great Lakes region, has published this book through Kollath-Stensaas Publishing:
ā
Non-native worms harm birch trees specifically and hardwood forests generally (excerpt from University of Toronto research, 2016):
The worms can cause dramatic changes to ecosystems by altering soils, reducing leaf litter and disrupting microbial interactions, which reduces biodiversity. Now it seems they are also eating plant seeds in the wild, potentially altering the make-up of forest communities. (ā¦)
āThey eat a lot more seeds than we think,ā says Cassin [ecologist at University of Toronto in Mississauga], now at the Ontario Invasive Plant Council in Canada.
The study shows another way that earthworms can alter forest ecosystems, particularly for small-seeded species such as birch, says Lee Frelich, an ecologist at the University of Minnesota in St Paul. (ā¦)
Once earthworms have invaded a habitat, they are almost impossible to eradicate, says Erin Bayne, of the University of Alberta in Canada. Conservationists must instead work to keep worms out of pristine habitats, he says, for example by restricting the use of worms as fishing bait and by controlling accidental transport of contaminated soil.
ā
Non-native worms lead to wildflower, fern, and sapling death. In hardwood forests, this loss is probably due partially to how worms degrade the duff layer; the loss of this layer also provokes soil erosion and directly eliminates the forest floor shelter of larger invertebrates and amphibians. When saplings cannot establish themselves, there is tree loss. (From Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)
Studies conducted by the University of Minnesota and forest managers show that at least seven species are invading our hardwood forests and causing the loss of tree seedlings, wildflowers, and ferns.
ā
Sugar maples, important both for forests and human food production, are devastated by the worms (from several years of research by Michigan Technological University across multiple national and state forests in the Upper Great Lakes):
A new study suggests that non-native worms are eating up the forest floor, causing sugar maples to die back and perhaps harming other forest dwellers.
Sugar maples are prized as much for their valuable lumber as for their sugary sap and dazzling fall colors. In Michigan alone, they are the basis of a multi-million-dollar industry. But several years ago, foresters began noticing that the crowns of the big trees appeared unhealthy, with bare limbs and little new growth. āThey were losing trees before they could harvest them.ā (ā¦)
ā
Great Lakes Worm Watch has some fun links and resources:
You can download a comprehensive key that helps identify earthworm species. Available for free, via Great Lakes Worm Watch:
Text from Great Lakes Worm Watch: āDifferent plant species respond to earthworm invasions differently. Some native plants appear to be very sensitive, so much so, that they can rapidly disappear when earthworms invade a forest. Some examples of these plants includeā¦āĀ
Worm Watch: āIf earthworm invasion leads to changes in the mycorrhizal community of fungi, the diversity of plants that make up the understory would be dramatically changed. Fungi are a preferred food of many earthworm species and they graze it heavily, which could dramatically impact the abundance and composition of fungi in the soil. Ā By grazing fungi on or near plant roots, the earthworms not only can damage the roots, but they prevent the plant and fungi from forming the symbiotic relationship where mycorrhizal fungi exchange nutrients and water for carbohydrates with green plants. Ā If the fungi canāt get enough food, they will die back even further. Ā For some of the native plants that need mycorrhizal fungi, especially when the plant is young and small, survival will be difficult if earthworms prevent this relationship from being formed.ā
-
NO MUSHROOMS
STOP
READ
REBLOG
Homo primis
I WANT MORE OVERGROWN RUINS TO EXPLORE AND IF I HAVE TO MAKE THEM MYSELF THEN SO BE IT
*throws cress seeds at an abandoned warehouse* be the change you want to see in the world
Alright guys! Listen up! Its story time..
Does anyone wanna know why my user name is the-bluebonnet-bandit? No? Well Iām going to tell you anyway.
Its because a long time ago back in highschool my home town was slowly begining to be re-developed. A field I had loved as a kid moving in became a series of storage units. So basically, under the presumption of the myth that bluebonnets are illegal to pick in Texas, I decided the best way for me to handle this was to go out and buy a pack of bluebonnet seeds to basically chuck āem at the field in question. It takes time for a peice of land to be purchased and for a structure to take place, so if I planted some bluebonnet seeds in the field in early October, by next season there would be a whole field of them right? And then they couldnāt build there, hazzah!
Except its not as easy as it sounds. And now as an ecology major with a focus in plants, I know that. See, many empty fields in the suburbs are filled with agressive and non-native plants that would make it hard to establish something like a bluebonmet in just one season. I would need to remove those plants in a certain desired area around my square of bluebonnets then make sure each seed survives to flower. And then ideally Iād want to keep expanding my target patch, or establish a different patch the next year at a key place on the field.
Even if not illegal, destroying a field of our state flower, or a beautiful field of wildflowers is a harder sell to the public. It creates more dialogue. Draws more attention. And if you pair this with, say, a grassroots community campaign to spare the land in question you definately have more of a chance of achieving your groupās goal if it looks like the backdrop to someoneās family photo. Plus, planting wildflowers, helps the community and wildlife.
Iām not saying go out and chuck seeds at stuff until you re-claim your space and use gardening and tree planting (tree graffiti, or tree-fiti if you willā¦) as counter meaaures for over-development and urban sprawl.
But Iām not-NOT saying thatā¦
*When to plant bluebonnet seeds
*How to plant a wildflower meadow
*US Wildflower planting guide
*Best trees to plant for your area
*How to make seed bombs
*Using community gardens to feed the hungry
*How to make a community garden
*How to conduct a petition drive
* Change.org - starting an online petition
*Find your townhall meetings
*Register to vote
That rabbit/hare post is messing me up. Iād thought they were synonyms. Their development and social behavior are all different. They canāt even interbreed. They donāt have the same number of chromosomes. Dogs, wolves, jackals, and coyotes can mate with each other and have fertile offspring but rabbits and hares cant even make infertile ones bc they just die in the womb. Wack.
These
are more genetically compatible than These
and thatās why morphology-based phylogeny has Issues
@aviculor
The problem is perspective. People always think dogs are the āstandardā animal, the metric to use for whether or not two organisms ālook likeā theyāre related. When in fact theyāre a massive outlier due to the fact that we fucked up this lineage of wolf beyond recognition with selective breeding. Itās why people always sayĀ ābreedā when they mean āspeciesā, especially when talking about groups like lizards which canāt even be defined cladistically since some of them are closer to snakes than each other. To say nothing of fish.
I once read an article that emphasized there is no such thing as a fish. Sharks and rays, lamprey, lobe-finned fish like lungfish and coelacanth, bichir and sturgeon, and of course the multiple infraclasses of moreĀ āmodernā fish groups are all only very distantly related to one another. Theyāve maintained semi-similar body structures only because there are limited ways to efficiently move through water as a vertebrate.Ā
This
And this
Are more distantly related from one another than you and I are from a lungfish
Which is absolutely fuckin wild.
Not only that, but all of us air-breathing land vertebrates, all the lizards and chickens and people and frogs, are closer to one another than those three āfishā are to one another as well.
these
are genetically closer than these
andā¦
these
are genetically closer than these
and my personal favorite, it really fucks with peopleā¦
these
are more genetically similar than these
COOL.Ā
Death is the light at the end of the tunnel.
I donāt know how to use tumblr.
Iāve been on this website, or whatever you call this, for four years. I think this is my first text post but idk. There is a lot of beautiful art and some great content here and I want to contribute my own part to the tumblr hivemind. I think Iāve lost like two accounts(idea counter, casual marxist) because I forgot my passwords. I may rename this blog The Idea Counter, or something else. Needless to say I suck at computer technology and social media. Iām really really passionate about ecology, plants and symbionts(insects, fungi,etc), and evolution (natural and artificial). Well thatās all I got this a.m., hopefully more posts to follow!
god itās almost SPRING tomorrow maybe iāll go down in the woods to look for blooming skunk cabbage they should be up and gettin sexy already
Might do as well
Rip Native Americans
Small tortoiseshell (left) and a peacock (right) on a buddleia (centre) #butterfly #lepidoptera #macronature #garden #buddleia #naturephotography #nature #wildlife #wildlifephotography
āFairy Dragonā by Robson Michel
Horseshoe crabs can lay between 60,000 to 120,000 eggs.Ā These eggs are laid in the sand or mud in batches of a few thousand at a time, Ā and take 2 weeks to hatch. Ā Many are eaten by seabirds while incubating.
(source)
(source)
The Real Life āHobbit Peopleā - WTF fun facts
1) Carthamus corymbosus
2) Carlina corymbosa
3) Carlina lanata
4) Cynara horrida
5) Onopordum elatum
6) Onopordum macracanthum
7) Cnicus afer
8) Scolymus hispanicus
9) Scolymus maculatus
10) Cineraria maritima
Illustrations taken from āFlora Graecaā by John Sibthorp, James Edward Smith, John Hawkins, John Lindley, Ferdinand Bauer. Illustrator, engraver; James Sowerby, engraver; James de Carle Sowerby, engraver; John White.
Published 1837.
Lloyd Library and Museum.
archive.org