hello vonnie
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
Peter Solarz
NASA
will byers stan first human second

romaâ
Sweet Seals For You, Always
ojovivo

izzy's playlists!
Keni

titsay
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Claire Keane
DEAR READER
KIROKAZE

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
almost home
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Not today Justin
Misplaced Lens Cap

seen from United States

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy

seen from Peru

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Peru
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Poland
@theihmenagerie
A really strong blue - Rowena Crest #OregonExplored via Instagram https://instagr.am/p/CELHlXjlvb7/
Bath day!
Throwback to the time my poor German teacher had to explain the concept of formal and informal pronouns to a class full of Australians and everyone was scandalised and loudly complained âwhy canât I treat everyone the same?â âI donât want to be a Sie!â âbut being friendly is respectful!â âwouldnât using âduâ just show I like them?â until one guy conceded âI suppose maybe Iâd use Sie with someone like the prime minister, if he werenât such a cuntâ and my teacher ended up with her head in her hands saying âyou are all banned from using du until I can trust youâ
God help Japanese teachers in Australia.
if this isnt an accurate representation of australia idk what is
Australiaâs reverse-formality respect culture is fascinating. We donât even really think about it until we try to communicate or learn about another culture and the rules that are pretty standard for most of the world just feel so wrong. I went to America this one time and I kept automatically thinking that strangers using âsirâ and âmaâamâ were sassing me.Â
Australians could not be trusted with a language with ingrained tiers of formal address. The most formal forms would immediately become synonyms for âgo fuck yourselfâ and if you werenât using the most informal version possible within three sentences of meeting someone theyâd take it to mean you hated them.
100% true.
the difference between ââscuse meâ and âexcuse meâ is a fistfight
See also: the Australian habit of insulting people by way of showing affection, which other English-speakers also do, but not in a context where deescalating the spoken invective actively increases the degree of offence intended, particularly if youâve just been affectionately-insulting with someone else.
By which I mean: if youâve just called your best mate an absolute dickhead, you canât then call a hated politician something thatâs (technically) worse, like a total fuckwit, because that would imply either that you were really insulting your mate or that you like the politician. Instead, you have to use a milder epithet, like bastard, to convey your seething hatred for the second person. But if your opening conversational gambit is slagging someone off, then itâs acceptable to go big (âThe PMâs a total cockstain!â) at the outset.
Also note that different modifiers radically change the meaning of particular insults. Case in point: calling someone a fuckinâ cunt is a deadly insult, calling someone a mad cunt is a compliment, and calling someone a fuckinâ mad cunt means youâre literally in awe of them. Because STRAYA.Â
Iroh and Sokka shopping together
Iroh and Sokka exchanging jokes
Iroh teaching Sokka how to play the tsungi horn and Sokka teaching Iroh how to throw a boomerang
Iroh and Sokka discussing politics during a friendly game of Pai Sho
Sokka telling Iroh everything Zuko has done when he joined the gaang and Iroh trying to hold back his tears because heâs so damn proud of his nephew
Iroh trying to brew tea the Water Tribe way and Sokka holding back his tears because itâs exactly how his mom used to make it
#this is wholesome#my only question is how do you even make tea at the south pole (via @liathcatâ )Â
They make tea from sea prunes and itâs definitely an acquired taste
Zuko, to Sokka: please stop stealing my father-figure
Hakoda, in the background: *signing Zukoâs adoption papers*
Sokka:
Hakoda, to Iroh: you get Sokka on the weekends provided that Zuko stays with me. We also share custody over Aang.
Iroh: where do I sign?
Zuko:
Sokka:
Aang, just happy to be there: so!! whenâs the family picnic :D
Iroh: of course sokka has been such a bless to me⌠He enjoys tea, poetry, he-
Sokka: *beats iroh in pai sho*
Iroh: hakoda, can I⌠can I have my nephew back
Across the globe, scores of COVID âlong-haulersâ have been fighting for doctors to believe and help them. On Friday, they finally got a meeting with the World Health Organization.
Listen, I know itâs a B*zzfeed article, but if you listen closely youâll hear the neglected screams of the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis community and all the researchers who fought for decades to get funding for this sort of thing, but because the illness got re-branded as âchronic fatigue syndromeâ and WRONGLY classified as a purely psychological disorder, and not a complete autonomic nervous system collapse following a major event (trauma, prior viral illness etc), weâre both woefully behind and wholly unprepared for the mass disability event that is about to follow Covid-19 if steps arenât taken Immediately to correct the guidelines being handed out by doctors to âlong haulâ Covid-19 patients when it comes to self care and long term recovery.
Jennifer Brea over on Twitter has been talking extensively about her experiences with having ME/CFS and then contracting Coronavirus on top of that (source). She also regularly boosts the experiences of others, and is one of the most forefront advocates for ME/CFS to be taken seriously by medical professionals worldwide, and her documentary www.unrest.film/ has been paramount to raising awareness to the neglect and medical abuse many people with chronic conditions face.Â
If youâre a âlong haulâ Covid-19 sufferer and youâre finding my blog because of the various chronic fatigue things Iâve posted over the years, Iâm so sorry. We think I got it back in March/April, and while we also think my MCAS meds might have helped me recover better, itâs been a rough few months, even by my standards. But please know you are not alone. Reach out to the ME/CFS communities online. Youâll find support and resources that may help you affirm that youâre not alone or crazy and that yes, some of the things your doctors are recommending you to do, like âkick starting your recovery with exerciseâ is in fact making you worse. Many, many, many people with ME/CFS suffer from severe and debilitating exercise intolerance, especially if their ME/CFS comes with a side helping of POTS (Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome). My exercise intolerance is made doubly worse by suffering from a mast cell dysfunction (MCAS), which means if I exercise too hard or too much, I can trigger an episode of anaphylaxis and go into shock. Sounds bonkers I know, but as anyone with a chronic condition can tell you, the body is capable of wild and often terrifying things that as many, many people are now finding out, most doctors are either ill equipped to deal with or even believe in.
But for whatever itâs worth, I believe you. I believe you got sick, and youâre still sick, and if I can give you one piece of advice from one chronically sick person to another, rest. Please, rest, please donât push yourselves. Be kind and gentle to yourself. Yes you might end up with some deconditioning, but you cannot show this thing who is boss by running a marathon or climbing a mountain. Health doesnât work that way, no matter what the moral purists and healthful bloggers say. Be gentle, be kind. Your body is going through a trauma not yet fully understood by medical science, and you cannot expect to bounce back the way you once did. Iâm sorry. You didnât do anything wrong. You didnât do anything to deserve this. Itâs just how things are. But youâre not alone, and I hope there is some comfort in that for you.
Artist Gabriela Hedrejci âQueenâ
On Exhibition at the Galeria Przy Teatrze
Artist Gabriela Hedrejci âRunâ
On Exhibition at the Galeria Przy Teatrze
Hryhorii Zorik( Ukranian, b. 1958) Provincial GrandeesÂ
George Lavroff (1805-1991) Made in France, 1925
Dr Nai-Chieh Liu, first author of the study, says: âBreeding for open nostrils is probably the best simple way to improve these breeds. Dog breeders should also avoid using dogs with extremely short muzzles, wide faces, and thick necks. These traits are all associated with increased risk of having BOAS.â
Joint lead author Dr David Sargan adds âAt this moment there is no conclusive way of predicting whether any individual pug or bulldog will develop breathing difficulties, so we are now looking for genetic tests that may help breeders get rid of BOAS more rapidly.
âThe best advice we can give to owners of short-nosed dogs is to make sure you get your dog checked annually for any potential difficulties in breathing, even if you have not yourself observed any in your dog, and to keep your dog fit and not let it get fat.â
Does my bird recognize me?
I was asked the other week if I think the birds I work with âknowâ who I am and can distinguish me from other humans. Personally, I can tell that the hens and turkeys I train at the research laboratory, the raptors I work with in the evenings, and my own pet chickens behave towards me in a way thatâs different from how they react to other human beings, suggesting that they do recognize me as an individual. But, as a someone working in behavioural research and running a science-based blog, of course Iâm not going to leave you all with nothing but personal anecdotes!
Hypothetically, chickens (and other birds that live in complex social groups) are capable of telling the difference between human faces, at the very least. We can make this assumption based on the fact that 1) individuals living in societies with selective/affiliative relationships/hierarchies (as chickens most certainly do) have to be able to differentiate between each other and remember each othersâ features (eye position, beak length, feather colour/pattern, movement/behaviour pattern, vocalizations, etc.) to survive (Iâve previously touched on this here). If no one recognize anyone and keep track of whoâs above and below who, there would be total chaos! 2), Pigeons have been trained to discriminate not only between different peopleâs faces, but between different genders and emotions as well (Watanabe and Masuda, 2010). There are no official scientific reports of similar tests being done with chickens that I could find, but based on their behavioural biology, and the things that Iâve personally trained chickens to do for my research, Iâm confident that theyâd be more than capable of it, too.
(Photo from https://experiment.com/projects/how-do-birds-see-the-world)
So, while itâs more than likely that chickens can discriminate between different human faces, this does not strictly mean they recognize their subject as individuals, per se. Individual recognition requires that the bird can recognize someone as a whole, and not just a forward-facing portrait of that person, as most recognition experiments do (Tibbetts and Dale, 2007). The bird has to be capable of forming a mental image of an individual from any angle, and also be able to use other identifying features other than the face, such as the personâs mannerisms and voice, like I mentioned above. Apparently, pigeons have difficulty with this. And again, thereâs nothing in the literature for it using chickens as a subject. But, I think any backyard poultry owner whoâs experienced the joy of their birds eagerly running over for treats or cuddles while ignoring other humans would strongly agree that they recognize their owner (and have positively associated them with food and maybe even affection, no less!), especially if you hatch your own chicks and have them imprint on you.
(Gyrfalcon photo by me, please ask before re-posting)
On a side note, letâs consider non-social birds, like raptors. Most raptors, with a few exceptions, live solitary lives in the wild outside of breeding season. They donât live in large groups, and donât have to deal with pecking orders. At the very least, they might have to remember if theyâve had to chase away the same intruder from their territory before, or if they chose the same partner to mate with the previous year. When Iâm doing shows/presentations with my raptors, people frequently also ask me if the bird Iâm holding âknowsâ me. I respond by saying that itâs more likely that things are the other way around - I know the bird very well. I know how to approach and handle the bird in the ways that make them feel most comfortable, I know what the possible stressors are in its environment that sets them off that I have to work to avoid, and all of their other quirks. All of this knowledge/understanding of the bird helps me give them as positive an interaction with me as possible during every training session, resulting in them being more comfortable with me, as opposed to a novice trainer/someone who has never worked with that specific bird before. This may also partly factor into why chickens behave differently in response to certain owners, compared to other humans they encounter. For example, a big part of the reason that my chickens seem to always want to be near me (other than the fact that Iâm basically a constant source of treats), but avoid my parents, probably has to do with the fact that I specifically know how to walk up to/pet/feed them without accidentally startling or intimidating them.
As another side note, some birds discriminate and remember human faces for years, without tons of training involved. These include species in urban environments that often interact with humans. Mockingbirds that are disturbed by a human in a mask while theyâre sitting on their eggs will display increasingly threatening behaviour (alarm-calling and mobbing) with each day the masked intruder appears (Stehlin et al., 2017). However, they behave towards someone in a new mask as if theyâve only encountered them for the first time. Again though, the researchers couldnât prove for certain whether this was due to recognition, or just discrimination.Â
(American crow photo by me, please ask before re-posting)
A more famous example here on tumblr might be a similar experiment done with crows. Researchers wore masks and trapped crows, who responded by making vocalizations used as threats to ward off predators. Amazingly, these crows made the same calls if they saw someone wearing the same mask three years later (Marzluff et al., 2010). Itâs also been shown that different regions of their brains respond to different emotional states in response to the mask (Marzluff et al., 2012). In another experiment, one group of crows was trapped by a researcher wearing a âthreateningâ mask, while the other group was captured, but also fed by a researcher wearing a âcaringâ mask. Seeing either the threatening or caring mask would activate different neural circuits in the crowsâ brains - the first associated with negative emotions, and the second with reward. Itâll probably be a long time before any lab gets the funding to do PET scans on chickens, but until then, I think us doting chicken-lovers will happily agree that our birds know and recognize us!
(Photo from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7W95cXU24E)
References:
Watanabe S, Masuda S. Integration of auditory and visual information in human face discrimination in pigeons: Behavioral and anatomical study. Behavioural brain research. 2010 Feb 11;207(1):61-9.
Tibbetts EA, Dale J. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2007 Oct 1;22(10):529-37.
Stehlin JA, Crook-Hill J, Bailey B. Human Facial Recognition by Northern Mockingbirds. Papers & Publications: Interdisciplinary Journal of Undergraduate Research. 2017;6(1):10.
Marzluff JM, Walls J, Cornell HN, Withey JC, Craig DP. Lasting recognition of threatening people by wild American crows. Animal Behaviour. 2010 Mar 1;79(3):699-707.
Marzluff JM, Miyaoka R, Minoshima S, Cross DJ. Brain imaging reveals neuronal circuitry underlying the crowâs perception of human faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012 Sep 6:201206109.
Happy Sunday, everyone! And, thank you for 1000 followers :) I promised Iâd write up a new post for those of you who just started following me, so enjoy this video of one of my black sex-link hens, the Queen, being cute and dust-bathing in the sun.
I think everyone here on birdblr loves to watch their birbs bathe, whether itâs done in water or a nice patch of dirt. Some bird species have no problem bathing in either, but most, if not all gallinaceous birds (poultry, including chickens and quails) will only dustbathe. Why do they do it - how does rolling around in dirt keep you clean?
The most common answer people will give you is that dustbathing keeps ectoparasites - mites and lice - off a chickenâs skin and feathers. While this has been common knowledge among both chicken farmers and backyard chicken owners for decades, you might be surprised to learn that no one ever actually tested this scientifically until 2012. There are possibly hundreds of studies which basically tell us that dry dirt or sand is just like dry shampoo for the birds, absorbing excess oil from their feathers, and removing it once the dust is shaken, or ârousedâ out. Certain species of avian mites and lice feed primarily on the oil, so it was believed that regularly removing it would leave the parasites without a food source, if the physical movements involved in dustbathing behaviour didnât dislodge them first. Martin and Mullens were the first researchers to actually test and support the hypothesis that dustbathing behaviour evolved, at least in part, specifically for the purpose of reducing the number of parasites on a birdâs body. Their work also showed that sulfur, which is among one of the many naturally occurring elements in dirt, plays a big role in keeping parasites away by killing them through direct contact and possibly fumigation. So, there is solid evidence that dustbathing helps with parasite control, although no one ever really bothered looking into it, for some reason.
What was more commonly studied was the effect of dustbathing on a chickenâs feathers. By removing all of that excess oil, down feathers in particular become fluffier as a result (side note: this is also one of the few instances where the word âfluffyâ is used in a scientific paper). This increases the overall insulation ability of the plumage, and hens housed on an appropriate dustbathing substrate have been shown to have lower temperatures on their backs (important for keeping cool on hot days like today!).
Hereâs the not-so-cute, kinda depressing part of this post. We know that dustbathing has all these hygiene-related benefits for the birds. So why are hens kept on commercial egg farms (note: Iâm only speaking based on current Canadian poultry industry practices) not given anything to dustbathe on? Generally, commercial birds who never get the chance to go outside donât become exposed to ectoparasites, which most farmers are only concerned about because they can cause a hen to lay fewer eggs per year. Barring that, itâs argued that there just isnât any other reason to give hens a chance to dustbathe. Thatâs where animal welfare researchers come in (and thatâs why I love my job). In the last few decades, there have been a plethora of studies showing that hens kept in wire cages will âshamâ dustbathe, or perform dustbathing behaviours when there is no dust to begin with. At that point, the behaviour becomes labelled as âabnormalâ, indicating that the animal has some need that is not being met. Other studies have demonstrated numerically how much work a hen will put in to dustbathe - for example, some experiments involve hens learning to push through heavy doors (up to a certain percent of their own body weight) just to access a pan of peat to dustbathe in. Finally, a fascinating study done very recently showed that dustbathing quail had a higher tendency of exhibiting possible facial indicators of positive emotions (i.e. dustbathing birb = birb with poofier face = possibly happy birb). With such a large body of solid, scientific evidence to support a significant emotional significance of expressing proper dustbathing behaviour in birds (I donât know about you, but there are days when a nice bath/shower is more about stress relief and self-care than just keeping clean), researchers have been able to effectively argue for providing dustbathing opportunities to commercial laying hens. In Canada, battery cages will be banned from all egg farms by 2036, and replaced by âenriched housingâ, which will be required to include, among other things, a small area for dustbathing behaviour.
So, while it may sound annoying at times when researchers like me say things like âthere is/isnât any scientific evidence for xâ, the reason we need to look for that solid evidence is that itâs the only thing that industries and the public will listen to, and often itâs the only thing that can bring about positive (but small) change!
References:
Bertin A, Cornilleau F, Lemarchand J, Boissy A, Leterrier C, Nowak R, Calandreau L, Blache MC, Boivin X, Arnould C, Lansade L. Are there facial indicators of positive emotions in birds? A first exploration in Japanese quail. Behavioural processes. 2018 Jun 30.
Martin CD, Mullens BA. Housing and dustbathing effects on northern fowl mites (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) and chicken body lice (Menacanthus stramineus) on hens. Medical and veterinary entomology. 2012 Sep;26(3):323-33.
Van Liere DW, Bokma S. Short-term feather maintenance as a function of dust-bathing in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 1987 Aug 1;18(2):197-204.
Wichman A, Keeling LJ. Hens are motivated to dustbathe in peat irrespective of being reared with or without a suitable dustbathing substrate. Animal behaviour. 2008 Apr 1;75(4):1525-33.
https://www.eggfarmers.ca/press/egg-farmers-of-canada-announces-industry-wide-transition-away-from-conventional-housing/
I am DEEPLY curious what the structure of wild canids looks like compared to show dogs but it is hard to get a coyote in a hand stack, is the problem
Ok this isnât quite a stack but it does track with what Iâve seen of Coyotes in the wild- hips are Juuuuuuust lower than the shoulders, the tail hangs until theyâre really stoked about something and they have LONG necks with lil heads. In Motion, they walk straight-backed and keep thier heads fairly high, but the tail still slopes.Â
Gray wolf is not dissimilar to coyote but... chonkier. Coyote is a square, Wolf is a Rectangle, also his feet rest a lot further back than the coytoteâs.
Red Fox meanwhile, is walking around with his hips higher than his shoulders, and his feet rest farther forward than his hip joint.
And rounding out the list of Wild Canids I thought of at 3 AM, we have the Maned Wolf which...
That sure is an animal alright.
I think for direct comparison to domestic dogs, youâd want to look at the dingo. I think itâs currently debated whether dingos are wild descendants of early domestic dogs, or whether they just diverged from the dog/wolf ancestor at around the same time as domestic dogs, but either way theyâre very close relatives. Also the short coat is nice for being able to actually see the joints. :P
I know very little about dog structure things, but what stands out to me compared to most dogs I see are the very flat back, the near-vertical set of the upper thigh and the hock on the back leg, and the more gradual slope of the chest.
In January this year, I attended Dr. Amy Cookâs PLAY WAY seminar at Pasadena Humane Society.
The seminar was about âsocial playâ as a tool for rehabilitating reactive/stressed/fearful dogs. âSocial Playâ has been defined as something different from playing with toys (tug, fetch, etc) It is literally âgoofing aroundâ with your dog in a way that they like that makes them happy. Body language responsiveness, movement and timing is everything.
Not only did we get to see some inspiring and entertaining video footage of Amy Cook playing with her dogs, some attendees had also brought their own dogs to play with, while Amy offered coaching. Â
It was an amazing and delightful experience and I couldnât wait to get home to play with my 15 year old Boogie who hasnât been interested in Tug or Fetch in over a year due to his vision loss.
The Play Way class was like learning a new language, a new vocabulary. You had to be there.
As far as I know, there is no other information out there on how to play with your dog without using toys, and until this seminar, I had no idea that dogs LAUGH. (I donât think Boogie has ever laughed)
This infographic cannot possibly do justice to all the material covered in the Play Way seminar, which also focused on play as âtherapyâ. For now, I hope this is enough to pique everyoneâs interest in the subject. This is another way to be mindful and respectful of our dogâs body language and of our own body language. I still have a lot to learn!
- Lili
LINKS:
Download Poster here in high-res (shareable without modifications, and with attribution)
Amy Cookâs online Play Way classÂ
Doggie Language - my new forthcoming book will have more art on dog body language.Â
i am BEGGING everybody to please look at this picture of a dog who worked at Wood Island Lighthouse in Biddeford, Maine in 1903. his name was Sailor and it was his job to ring the foghorn. he was famous nationwide. mariners passing nearby the lighthouse would toot their horns in greeting and he would get very excited and ring the foghorn as a hello
source:Â https://www.mainememory.net/artifact/18525
sometimes i just get obsessed with how lonely humans are, as a species. we see faces everywhere. we have stories about beings living in the things of our world that go back as long as weâve been telling stories. weâve been sending our songs and dances up to the sky for millennia, and when we figured out there was something beyond our sky, we started sending songs out there too. we tell each other about fairies and bigfoots and worlds lying under the skin of our own. we name robots and look for personality in code. we tamed dogs to have friends to hang out with and we dream about aliens. we see life everywhere. what is it, exactly, that weâre trying to replace? what left us alone in the first place?
I feel like this is because we fundimentally are. The seeing faces and the pets less so, bc those have valid, accepted reasons for it. The faces is bc our brains basically work on pattern recognition, and thus is always trying to see patterns and connections â even when none exist. The pets are bc humans are hyper social not just to our own but others.
But our seemingly deep desire for a close humanlike entity beyond ourselves is something else. I think itâs really telling that throughout our history, weâre constantly making stories of humans but Not Really. We try to explain why theyâre still here but Not â itâs just another parellel space, just further into the deep woods, just under the ocean, just too far into the sky, just in the future by our own creationâŚand we get there and search for them there and canât find them, and thus push these hypothetical people in a different place we havenât been before, where thereâs still a chance. Please, please be out there, we seem to ask, please dont leave us all alone; and the stubbornness of this species wonât let us accept the fact that, despite being one of the many many species/subspecies of humans, weâre the only ones left.
I do believe it can be explained by the strange nature of the human species. There were so many varieties out there, so many types of humans. Not the shallow, surface level thats human diversity now, where pretty much we divide ourselves into âracesâ that boil down to cosmetic and cultural differences. But truly different types of humans. We know early homo sapians came into contact with several, we know we were close to a few.
The Neanderthals, our closest partner, in where pretty much anyone who left Africa has a bit of their ghost echoing in our bones, to the point 20% of the full Neanderthal DNA made it to the modern day, in different ways and in different people. We were close to them, they were parts of the same groups, they were friends, they were family. And now theyâre gone. And all the others are gone too.
We try to explain it, try to reach back over this veil of times long gone, and understand all of them, understand why weâre so alone. Was it us? We ask. This has to be our fault. This strange feeling of loss and loneliness must be a punishment for something, we think, like a child who found themselves all alone and can only wail why, coming to self blame. The fae is gone bc we destroyed their lands, the old gods are gone bc of us, we destroyed magic, ai is going to inharently bc cruel since humans are cruel, aliens would never visit us â look at us! Weâre destined to destroy ourselves you know. Weâre the ones who managed to kill every other group. We had to of. Bc whatâs the alternative? This is just a cruel twist of fate? That our loneliness is meaningless?
We have ghosts in our bones and in our hearts. Throughout history itâs been a dance between the desire for a unique connection we lost a long time ago between family members long gone, and this strange survivers guilt pulling us back away again. We mourn our uniqueness, as we know it wasnât supposed to be like this.