it all comes tumbling down, tumbling down. @thivus-2 - Tumblr Blog

I.O.I: LOOP CONCEPT PHOTO | NAYOUNG

stop calling real world things cognitohazards it makes you look silly. you might as well call them Necromancer Curses

If cognitohazards aren’t real, why have you never posted about Henry Nowak? Why are you going to block me for asking the question?

txttletale

crash bandicoot is another game that the entire games industry and usamerican gamers will talk of with rhapsodic love constantly and then you see one (1) frame of it and its 1930s racist

toweringclam

It can't be that b—

Oh.

thivus-2

Doesn’t this stupid shit ever get exhausting? You don’t have to pretend to be offended by everything

fr3nstimu1ator

The British police acting like this is nothing new. Back in the 90s, a White teenager named Stephen Lawrence was stabbed to death by a group of men from a local gang. The Metropolitan police deliberately bungled the investigation so that the attackers would go free. Later it was found that undercover officers were tasked with smearing members of the victim's family to discourage them from trying to get justice.

“Yeah, it’s stated policy and they’ve always acted on it, but white privilege or something. Don’t be racist”

originalvisual

billlie: zap

thankyou-taeyeon

jiwoo 260515 heavy serenade | kbs music bank

jambeast

“it's certainly not difficult to find more egregious examples of British cops doing a terrible job” you guys support them in those instances too. I assume you’re referring to instances which occurred some fifty years ago, because for the past few decades British cops have been loyal footsoldiers to the anti-Whites. You support the police in the Henry Nowak story for the same reason you support them in Rotherham for the same reason you support them when they arrest people for posting offensive things on social media

You're quoting the other guy there, I didn't say that.

That said 1) I think that, while the degree to which the police arrest people for posting things on social media is heavily exaggerated by the right, to the extent that it actually *does* happen I don't support it and think it's bad.

2) Police failures in Rotherham were bad and condemnable, I just think they were also condemnable when the crimes weren't committed by the ethnic group you don't like too. As far as reasons why the police failed with those cases, there are dozens of contributing factors more significant than race, and the evidence of race being a contributing factor are mostly half-quotes from an off-handed comment from like 2 or 3 individuals.

You guys have looked at all the bad crime in the country, drawn a big red circle around only the cases done specifically by the skin color you don't like, gave it a special name and decided it was the only crime that matters.

Like, statistically, pakistanis commit ~2% of the child sex crimes nationally, while making up ~2% of the population.

But if you look exclusively, not at child-sex-crimes in general, but child-sex-crimes-committed-by-pakistani-men, pakistani men commit ONE HUNDRED percent of those child sex crimes committed by pakistani men! (likewise, in 100% of cases when it rains on a tuesday... it is on a tuesday.)

Do you see the issue with the statistical analysis here?

There's like a real world out there with real people, committing real crimes for real reasons, and not for the fantastical reasons that you guys vividly fantasise about about an epic rape-crusade of all-against all, where every criminal whose skin color you don't like is a footsoldier carrying out the will of the-skin-color-you-don't-like specifically to offend you in your chair. Like they aren't real individual criminals that commit real crimes for real reasons, but Manifestations of the Evil Spirit of the Concept of Brown.

thivus-2

Aside from revealing your rape fetish, what a worthless response.

Henry Nowak did not have to die, and the only reason you support the police in his case is the victim was White and the perpetrator was brown. Do you remember him? Henry Nowak is the guy we were discussing before you thought of child rape and started sperging out about it. He got stabbed by a brown. Just stabbed, not raped. I know your thoughts would be the same if he had been raped, but there’s no evidence he was. Just stabbed. The brown used a knife the brown is legally allowed to carry and brandish anytime he wants, though it would be illegal for a White man like Henry Nowak to have it.

After being stabbed, he could have lived, but the British police dragged him across the ground, handcuffed him to open up the wounds, and watched as he died. After dying, the police searched his phone and his father’s phone to find any instance of racism. Thank God that Henry Nowak never sent an edgy meme or off-color joke in his life, because his killer would still be at large if he had.

The officers in the Digwa case were acting in compliance with the “Police Race Action Plan,” a national program backed by all 43 Chief Constables in England and Wales. Police officers in the UK are made to take compulsory race training where they are told of their “White privilege” and that they work in an “institutionally racist organisation” (oh the irony).

Let me also fix the stat which you pulled out of your ass as well: Despite being about 10% of the UK population, South Asians commit no officially published percentage of all violent crime, because the UK does not produce a comprehensive statistic for that measure. However, it is a matter of public record and has been for a long time that the police and UK government deliberately cover up crimes perpetrated by browns, and have done so for decades.

jambeast

you thought of child rape and started sperging out about it.

You brought up Rotherham, that whole bit was me talking about Rotherham, something you accused me of supporting.

brandish anytime he wants

Not brandish - and not, y'know, stab. Pretty sure he got several weapons-related charges in addition to the life sentence for murder, extending the sentence

After being stabbed, he could have lived, but the British police dragged him across the ground, handcuffed him to open up the wounds, and watched as he died.

From the sentencing remarks

"It passed upwards through soft tissue, between the two uppermost ribs, catching a lung and cutting an important vein, behind the collar bone. This was to a depth of 8cm from the skin surface. The consequent bleeding flowed into his chest cavity. The pathologist, Amanda Jeffrey, found 1200 ml, or over 2 pints, of blood there. She said that no emergency medical treatment would have permitted access to the bleeding vein. In simple terms, he would not have survived, however quickly he received first aid, CPR or expert medical treatment."

He got stabbed in the lung and the bleeding was almost entirely internal, since you can see in the video that there is basically no visible blood outside his body outside of like a bloody nose, which is why the police wouldn't immediately know that he was stabbed until they checked about a minute later.

fter dying, the police searched his phone and his father’s phone to find any instance of racism

I think that was mostly just to find footage of the altercation, which the murderer knew was on it which is why he stole the phone and tried to hide it before it was confiscated by the police when they arrested him (and then tried him for murder, found him guilty, and sentenced him to life in prison)

It's hard to use this as a case of the UK government deliberately covering up crimes committed by Browns when this crime committed by a Brown is headline news with officially released bodycams and the resulting anti-brown riots, and when the brown in question was arrested, tried, found guilty, and again, sentenced to life in prison.

Maybe the murderer thought he was in the same Woke Anti-White Britain that you imagine we live in where playing the race card could let him get away with murder. Demonstrably this was not true! He is very much Not Getting Away With Murder.

thivus-2

Well you do support the police’s actions in Rotherham, I just didn’t expect an offhand comment about that fact would lead you to dwell on and fixate on child rape for eight paragraphs.

Brandish. Sikhs are allowed to brandish kirpans. I’m not sure where you heard they are not, but they are. They may have them and brandish them any time they want. If it is illegal for them to brandish them, show me the law.

The judge is wrong, at least about that specifically. The police assisted the murderer and directly caused Nowaks death. If the police had followed the old racist protocol instead of the new anti-racist protocol, they would have taken Nowak to a hospital and he would still be alive.

The police knew he was stabbed when he said “I’ve been stabbed.” The brown said he hadn’t been stabbed. Because the police are anti-racists, they automatically sided with the brown.

You are incorrect that they searched Nowak and his father’s phones “mostly to find footage of the altercation.” It’s true that there was footage on Nowaks phone of the altercation, but I’m referring to when they went through his phone looking for racist messages, and then did the same thing to his father (who was not a witness and had no videos of the altercation to look for).

This crime went viral on social media and started a public outcry, and that is the only reason it reached the news and the brown was sentenced. There was a long period of time in which no major news outlets had covered it at all despite the fuss. If it had not gone viral, the brown would have received probation and you wouldn’t have heard about it

jambeast

Brandish.

There's a difference between carrying/owning a weapon and brandishing a weapon. Being a Sikh might be one of the many legal justifications for carrying a certain kind of knife on you, but it wouldn't grant the legal freedom to wave it around and threaten people with it, which is what 'brandish' means.

From the sentencing remarks:

"An offence of Having a Bladed Article in a public place will not be prosecuted; there has been an acceptance that its possession in those circumstances, can amount to a good religious and, therefore, legal reason for having it. The blade of the knife will not be on display; either it is under clothing or, alternatively, in a sheath."

The judge is wrong, at least about that specifically.

You are strangely confident about these specific medical details for a random poster on the internet. What *medical* reason would you have to think that? Not political or ideological reason, but medical reason, like your opinion about how bloodloss works - I would invite you to base this on the actual facts of the case, and not simply what facts would need to be true to most clearly express your worldview and political opinions.

Do you think the Pathologist just made it up and lied, and that the bit about two pints of internal bleeding in the chest cavity and cut lungs was just not true? Is it a lie, and a part of a Woke Conspiracy against White People? Did you conduct your own autopsy on his body and come to a different conclusion, that it was precisely the level of injury where beginning CPR sixty seconds earlier would've saved his life?

Like even if we were to grant that the police were being woke and anti-white and delayed their response because they hate white people, is it not possible for that to happen... and ALSO that he would've died anyway, just due to the way he happened to be stabbed and where the knife went?

The police knew

The police didn't know anything until they checked. At first it looked like it wasn't the case (police call didn't mention it, it was dark, the bleeding was internal and not visible on the outside, the guy wasn't super coherent (he was saying 'my face' when none of the stab wounds were on his face, leading the lady who was inspecting him for wounds to inspect his face for wounds when the wounds were actually on his chest and leg), etc), and then they checked, and then after checking, a minute or two after initially seeing him, they called an ambulance and began CPR.

they automatically sided with the brown.

That's because that guy was the one who called the police and lied about being the victim of a crime. When the police get a call saying "help, I've been attacked!" they wouldn't *assume* that person was lying and is actually the perpetrator, but rather they'd investigate and check. In this case, they arrived on the scene, initially thought he wasn't stabbed, then checked, and found out that they'd been lied to, and put the lying murderer in prison with a life sentence.

I’m referring to when they went through his phone looking for racist messages

Where did you read that?

Either way, to the extent that happened, you would expect in any murder investigation for there to be a thorough investigation exploring all avenues and building a clear picture of all the moving parts involved, but I don't think it would have been the primary goal. Or even secondary. The phone had video footage of a murder, I would expect that to be the main priority in an investigation into a murder case.

Of course, neither of us can prove what the police's priorities were there as far as investigating his phone; I can posit the obvious reasonable ones that a reasonable person would have reason to expect, but you can always posit the crazy, insane, stupid and evil ones.

And the evidence is always gonna be that there isn't any evidence, because they hid it, to keep you from uncovering their anti-white agenda.

And the reason you think they have an anti-white agenda is because there isn't any evidence of them having an anti-white agenda because they hid it from you. And the reason you think they hid it from you is their anti-white agenda. Which you think they have because they're hiding the evidence from you. And so on and so forth.

If it had not gone viral, the brown would have received probation and you wouldn’t have heard about it

Yeah, yeah, the police would've done that, because they're woke and anti-white. And you believe they're anti-white because they would've only given him probation. And you believe they would've only given him probation because they're anti-white. And you believe they're anti-white because they would've only...

And if you debunk one you replace it with one of a hundred other bullshit stories you believe for ideological reasons, all reinforcing eachother in a massive web of bullshit. It's very sad!

thivus-2

90% of this response is you repeating your own claims you made before, this line jumped out at me though: “And the reason you think they have an anti-white agenda is because there isn't any evidence of them having an anti-white agenda because they hid it from you”

Just incapable of being honest. The evidence that they have an anti-white agenda is in their explicitly anti-white Police Race Action Plan which they are following, the one I pointed out earlier.

Dr. Krzysztof Magier is a doctor who watched the footage and says the police’s actions directly killed Henry, I agree with him.

You relied on the sentencing remarks. I asked for you to show me the law saying Sikhs may not brandish their gay little knives

The circular shit at the end of your response is nonsensical. The police wouldn’t have given him probation because that’s the job of the judiciary, and the police and judiciary are separate even if they’re parts of the same government. I don’t believe they’re anti-White because they would have given him probation, I believe they’re anti-White because they helped kill him (because he’s White), have helped cover up other anti-White crimes, and (and this is the kicker) because they have an explicit policy program outline how to properly be anti-White, as well as the pseudohistorical basis for doing so

jambeast

“it's certainly not difficult to find more egregious examples of British cops doing a terrible job” you guys support them in those instances too. I assume you’re referring to instances which occurred some fifty years ago, because for the past few decades British cops have been loyal footsoldiers to the anti-Whites. You support the police in the Henry Nowak story for the same reason you support them in Rotherham for the same reason you support them when they arrest people for posting offensive things on social media

You're quoting the other guy there, I didn't say that.

That said 1) I think that, while the degree to which the police arrest people for posting things on social media is heavily exaggerated by the right, to the extent that it actually *does* happen I don't support it and think it's bad.

2) Police failures in Rotherham were bad and condemnable, I just think they were also condemnable when the crimes weren't committed by the ethnic group you don't like too. As far as reasons why the police failed with those cases, there are dozens of contributing factors more significant than race, and the evidence of race being a contributing factor are mostly half-quotes from an off-handed comment from like 2 or 3 individuals.

You guys have looked at all the bad crime in the country, drawn a big red circle around only the cases done specifically by the skin color you don't like, gave it a special name and decided it was the only crime that matters.

Like, statistically, pakistanis commit ~2% of the child sex crimes nationally, while making up ~2% of the population.

But if you look exclusively, not at child-sex-crimes in general, but child-sex-crimes-committed-by-pakistani-men, pakistani men commit ONE HUNDRED percent of those child sex crimes committed by pakistani men! (likewise, in 100% of cases when it rains on a tuesday... it is on a tuesday.)

Do you see the issue with the statistical analysis here?

There's like a real world out there with real people, committing real crimes for real reasons, and not for the fantastical reasons that you guys vividly fantasise about about an epic rape-crusade of all-against all, where every criminal whose skin color you don't like is a footsoldier carrying out the will of the-skin-color-you-don't-like specifically to offend you in your chair. Like they aren't real individual criminals that commit real crimes for real reasons, but Manifestations of the Evil Spirit of the Concept of Brown.

thivus-2

Aside from revealing your rape fetish, what a worthless response.

Henry Nowak did not have to die, and the only reason you support the police in his case is the victim was White and the perpetrator was brown. Do you remember him? Henry Nowak is the guy we were discussing before you thought of child rape and started sperging out about it. He got stabbed by a brown. Just stabbed, not raped. I know your thoughts would be the same if he had been raped, but there’s no evidence he was. Just stabbed. The brown used a knife the brown is legally allowed to carry and brandish anytime he wants, though it would be illegal for a White man like Henry Nowak to have it.

After being stabbed, he could have lived, but the British police dragged him across the ground, handcuffed him to open up the wounds, and watched as he died. After dying, the police searched his phone and his father’s phone to find any instance of racism. Thank God that Henry Nowak never sent an edgy meme or off-color joke in his life, because his killer would still be at large if he had.

The officers in the Digwa case were acting in compliance with the “Police Race Action Plan,” a national program backed by all 43 Chief Constables in England and Wales. Police officers in the UK are made to take compulsory race training where they are told of their “White privilege” and that they work in an “institutionally racist organisation” (oh the irony).

Let me also fix the stat which you pulled out of your ass as well: Despite being about 10% of the UK population, South Asians commit no officially published percentage of all violent crime, because the UK does not produce a comprehensive statistic for that measure. However, it is a matter of public record and has been for a long time that the police and UK government deliberately cover up crimes perpetrated by browns, and have done so for decades.

jambeast

you thought of child rape and started sperging out about it.

You brought up Rotherham, that whole bit was me talking about Rotherham, something you accused me of supporting.

brandish anytime he wants

Not brandish - and not, y'know, stab. Pretty sure he got several weapons-related charges in addition to the life sentence for murder, extending the sentence

After being stabbed, he could have lived, but the British police dragged him across the ground, handcuffed him to open up the wounds, and watched as he died.

From the sentencing remarks

"It passed upwards through soft tissue, between the two uppermost ribs, catching a lung and cutting an important vein, behind the collar bone. This was to a depth of 8cm from the skin surface. The consequent bleeding flowed into his chest cavity. The pathologist, Amanda Jeffrey, found 1200 ml, or over 2 pints, of blood there. She said that no emergency medical treatment would have permitted access to the bleeding vein. In simple terms, he would not have survived, however quickly he received first aid, CPR or expert medical treatment."

He got stabbed in the lung and the bleeding was almost entirely internal, since you can see in the video that there is basically no visible blood outside his body outside of like a bloody nose, which is why the police wouldn't immediately know that he was stabbed until they checked about a minute later.

fter dying, the police searched his phone and his father’s phone to find any instance of racism

I think that was mostly just to find footage of the altercation, which the murderer knew was on it which is why he stole the phone and tried to hide it before it was confiscated by the police when they arrested him (and then tried him for murder, found him guilty, and sentenced him to life in prison)

It's hard to use this as a case of the UK government deliberately covering up crimes committed by Browns when this crime committed by a Brown is headline news with officially released bodycams and the resulting anti-brown riots, and when the brown in question was arrested, tried, found guilty, and again, sentenced to life in prison.

Maybe the murderer thought he was in the same Woke Anti-White Britain that you imagine we live in where playing the race card could let him get away with murder. Demonstrably this was not true! He is very much Not Getting Away With Murder.

thivus-2

Well you do support the police’s actions in Rotherham, I just didn’t expect an offhand comment about that fact would lead you to dwell on and fixate on child rape for eight paragraphs.

Brandish. Sikhs are allowed to brandish kirpans. I’m not sure where you heard they are not, but they are. They may have them and brandish them any time they want. If it is illegal for them to brandish them, show me the law.

The judge is wrong, at least about that specifically. The police assisted the murderer and directly caused Nowaks death. If the police had followed the old racist protocol instead of the new anti-racist protocol, they would have taken Nowak to a hospital and he would still be alive.

The police knew he was stabbed when he said “I’ve been stabbed.” The brown said he hadn’t been stabbed. Because the police are anti-racists, they automatically sided with the brown.

You are incorrect that they searched Nowak and his father’s phones “mostly to find footage of the altercation.” It’s true that there was footage on Nowaks phone of the altercation, but I’m referring to when they went through his phone looking for racist messages, and then did the same thing to his father (who was not a witness and had no videos of the altercation to look for).

This crime went viral on social media and started a public outcry, and that is the only reason it reached the news and the brown was sentenced. There was a long period of time in which no major news outlets had covered it at all despite the fuss. If it had not gone viral, the brown would have received probation and you wouldn’t have heard about it

jambeast

“it's certainly not difficult to find more egregious examples of British cops doing a terrible job” you guys support them in those instances too. I assume you’re referring to instances which occurred some fifty years ago, because for the past few decades British cops have been loyal footsoldiers to the anti-Whites. You support the police in the Henry Nowak story for the same reason you support them in Rotherham for the same reason you support them when they arrest people for posting offensive things on social media

You're quoting the other guy there, I didn't say that.

That said 1) I think that, while the degree to which the police arrest people for posting things on social media is heavily exaggerated by the right, to the extent that it actually *does* happen I don't support it and think it's bad.

2) Police failures in Rotherham were bad and condemnable, I just think they were also condemnable when the crimes weren't committed by the ethnic group you don't like too. As far as reasons why the police failed with those cases, there are dozens of contributing factors more significant than race, and the evidence of race being a contributing factor are mostly half-quotes from an off-handed comment from like 2 or 3 individuals.

You guys have looked at all the bad crime in the country, drawn a big red circle around only the cases done specifically by the skin color you don't like, gave it a special name and decided it was the only crime that matters.

Like, statistically, pakistanis commit ~2% of the child sex crimes nationally, while making up ~2% of the population.

But if you look exclusively, not at child-sex-crimes in general, but child-sex-crimes-committed-by-pakistani-men, pakistani men commit ONE HUNDRED percent of those child sex crimes committed by pakistani men! (likewise, in 100% of cases when it rains on a tuesday... it is on a tuesday.)

Do you see the issue with the statistical analysis here?

There's like a real world out there with real people, committing real crimes for real reasons, and not for the fantastical reasons that you guys vividly fantasise about about an epic rape-crusade of all-against all, where every criminal whose skin color you don't like is a footsoldier carrying out the will of the-skin-color-you-don't-like specifically to offend you in your chair. Like they aren't real individual criminals that commit real crimes for real reasons, but Manifestations of the Evil Spirit of the Concept of Brown.

thivus-2

Aside from revealing your rape fetish, what a worthless response.

Henry Nowak did not have to die, and the only reason you support the police in his case is the victim was White and the perpetrator was brown. Do you remember him? Henry Nowak is the guy we were discussing before you thought of child rape and started sperging out about it. He got stabbed by a brown. Just stabbed, not raped. I know your thoughts would be the same if he had been raped, but there’s no evidence he was. Just stabbed. The brown used a knife the brown is legally allowed to carry and brandish anytime he wants, though it would be illegal for a White man like Henry Nowak to have it.

After being stabbed, he could have lived, but the British police dragged him across the ground, handcuffed him to open up the wounds, and watched as he died. After dying, the police searched his phone and his father’s phone to find any instance of racism. Thank God that Henry Nowak never sent an edgy meme or off-color joke in his life, because his killer would still be at large if he had.

The officers in the Digwa case were acting in compliance with the “Police Race Action Plan,” a national program backed by all 43 Chief Constables in England and Wales. Police officers in the UK are made to take compulsory race training where they are told of their “White privilege” and that they work in an “institutionally racist organisation” (oh the irony).

Let me also fix the stat which you pulled out of your ass as well: Despite being about 10% of the UK population, South Asians commit no officially published percentage of all violent crime, because the UK does not produce a comprehensive statistic for that measure. However, it is a matter of public record and has been for a long time that the police and UK government deliberately cover up crimes perpetrated by browns, and have done so for decades.

lee-sanghyeok

QUEENZ EYE : Y2K (2026)

thankyou-taeyeon

aespa 260515 WDA ending fairies | kbs music bank

#rape #meme #funny #women #obsession #radblr

argumate

There is a direct connection b/w leftist ideology presuming that white people are racist and the policemen jumping to the conclusion that Nowak was falsely claiming he had been stabbed in a desperate attempt to avoid a racism charge.

this story is the current obsession of those who believe in race war, most notably the owner of twitter and the rubes who follow him, and in some ways it's even dumber than the George Floyd obsession, not least because people should have learned better by now.

if I was the cop in that situation I would probably have assumed the guy on the ground was drunk! which is what British cops usually have to deal with when they get called to deal with someone being disorderly; murders are rare and the perpetrator doesn't usually call the cops.

and when the cops realised he had been stabbed they arrested the murderer and jailed him for life; this story is only an outrage if you believe cops should be clairvoyant, or arrest anyone of Indian ancestry on sight regardless of what's happening.

but obviously if you're already mad as hell that an Indian family is allowed to live in Britain in the first place then this is a convenient excuse to stoke racial hysteria and call for dumb policies.

jambeast

Looking at the bodycam video it really doesn't *look* like he'd been stabbed, you can't seen any blood or anything.

They arrive on scene to a call having been told that some drunk dude was being disorderly, find him delirious under a windowsil, drag him out, gently lay him in the recovery position. He says he's been stabbed, the guy who called the police says nobody was stabbed, police agree it doesn't LOOK like he's been stabbed but that they'll still check. And then they check, and then one minute later they call an ambulance. And once they figure who stabbed who the stabber is promptly arrested and sentenced to life in prison. Anything the stabber says to try to weasel out of life in prison (that the stabbed guy was racist and hate criming him) are swiftly dismissed.

The evidence of 'Two Tier Policing' here is that a murderer attempted to play the race card. But failed! The attempt to avoid a life sentence for murder by claiming the guy was racist and playing the victim didn't work, and they guy who did that got a life sentence.

But, like, The British Public can't really be reasoned with, so c'est la vie.

argumate

it's certainly not difficult to find more egregious examples of British cops doing a terrible job, but the incidents that spark discourse storms tend to be the dumb ones.

rendakuenthusiast

It's unfortunate that the police put handcuffs on a guy who turned out to be dying of a stab wound; but yeah I think given the situation the police were in - as soon as they come up to the incident, a family of sikhs including the murderer is actively lying to them about what happened, it's late at night and dark - I don't think it's super-unreasonable that they made the wrong call in the moment and corrected themselves within a few minutes and called help. And it seems like at that point there was no way to possibly have saved Nowak's life. Anyway, race war is already happening - it happened when the brown sikh foreigner randomly murdered a white person, his whole family tried to help him cover up the crime, and the specific method they used to cover up the crime was by claiming that he was racist. The people claiming it is wrong for white people to care about this are also engaging in race war, in a sense.

thivus-2

People talk about this like anti-Whiteness is not a guiding ideology for our times. “A whole family of Sikhs were saying one thing and this White guy was saying something else, who were they supposed to believe” the White guy. Obviously the White guy. I don’t care if it was one Sikh, a family of Sikhs, a Sikh neighborhood, or an entire town of Sikhs. I’m not siding with them against a White guy

storyweavingspider

Hey cool art style! Why’s it all white people and green/blue/purple people but nobody Black or Brown tho

thivus-2

“Because black people killed my grandma, okay?”

argumate

There is a direct connection b/w leftist ideology presuming that white people are racist and the policemen jumping to the conclusion that Nowak was falsely claiming he had been stabbed in a desperate attempt to avoid a racism charge.

this story is the current obsession of those who believe in race war, most notably the owner of twitter and the rubes who follow him, and in some ways it's even dumber than the George Floyd obsession, not least because people should have learned better by now.

if I was the cop in that situation I would probably have assumed the guy on the ground was drunk! which is what British cops usually have to deal with when they get called to deal with someone being disorderly; murders are rare and the perpetrator doesn't usually call the cops.

and when the cops realised he had been stabbed they arrested the murderer and jailed him for life; this story is only an outrage if you believe cops should be clairvoyant, or arrest anyone of Indian ancestry on sight regardless of what's happening.

but obviously if you're already mad as hell that an Indian family is allowed to live in Britain in the first place then this is a convenient excuse to stoke racial hysteria and call for dumb policies.

thivus-2

In the video he does say “I’ve been stabbed” and the police officer responds “I don’t think you have mate.” Then the murderer says “he wasn’t stabbed” and one officer says “I know, but we have to check don’t we” and another officer says “no.” Then Nowak dies.

You say “when the cops realised he had been stabbed,” completely glossing over the fact that this moment was after he was dead. They were reading his Miranda rights (or whatever the UK equivalent is called) to his corpse, and his dead body was unresponsive.

I’m not sure why you brought up alcohol? Considering that didn’t factor in at all. Nobody claimed anyone was drunk at the time. The police were given conflicting stories: a White man who said he had been stabbed, and was lying in a pool of his own blood; and a brown who said this guy was racist. Because the cops, and the UK government, are systematically anti-White, they automatically took the side of the brown.

Another outrage that you don’t even mention is explicitly discriminatory law: the brown had a weapon he is legally allowed to have and to carry. That White man was not legally allowed to have that same weapon. If the police had discovered a White man with that weapon, he would be arrested. The kirpan is a weapon only browns can carry. (If you’re about to say the knife wasn’t a kirpan, that’s false. That was widely reported, but the judges sentencing remarks confirmed it was a kirpan).

A third outrage you don’t mention: after it was confirmed he was dead, stabbed to death by the brown, the police did not immediately arrest the murderer as you claim. They took the dead White mans phone, and his father’s phones, and searched them both for any racist messages or language. There is an implication here that if he had been a racist (or the son of a racist) then it would have been okay for him to be assaulted and bleed out on the street. Thank God that Nowak and his father didn’t send a single off-color joke or edgy meme in their entire lives, or the brown would have never been arrested.

The police are currently saying that there’s nothing they could do, that Henry Nowak would have died no matter what. I don’t think that’s true at all, I think they’re lying. Handcuffing him and dragging him across the ground definitely contributed to his death.

Equality before the law would have prevented this. White supremacy would have prevented this. But we currently don’t have either, and so it happened this way

femaleidols

Trending Blogs

Recently Viewed Blogs

it all comes tumbling down, tumbling down.