uwu

lolita radfem stem supremacist

[figbite]

i think feminists must use 'socialisation', 'internalised misogyny', 'brainwashing', and other theories to attempt to make peace with the fact that they actually in practice just wouldn't like most women. most women are making choices that feminists fundamentally just do not agree with and cannot accept and they can't reconcile that with their performed love for women so they invent reasons for why those women would of course absolutely agree with them and make the exact same choices feminists make if only it weren't for the socialisation...

[uwurotting]

feminism isn't about loving women, it's about wanting to advance women's material interests. i'm well aware that a lot of women make choices i fundamentally don't agree with, so i support social engineering and authoritarian measures to lead them to make better choices.

[figbite]

i didn't say it was, and this post wasn't about that. it was about feminists manufacturing reasons for why women do things they don't agree with

[uwurotting]

fair enough, they certainly do that

[figbite]

i think feminists must use 'socialisation', 'internalised misogyny', 'brainwashing', and other theories to attempt to make peace with the fact that they actually in practice just wouldn't like most women. most women are making choices that feminists fundamentally just do not agree with and cannot accept and they can't reconcile that with their performed love for women so they invent reasons for why those women would of course absolutely agree with them and make the exact same choices feminists make if only it weren't for the socialisation...

[uwurotting]

feminism isn't about loving women, it's about wanting to advance women's material interests. i'm well aware that a lot of women make choices i fundamentally don't agree with, so i support social engineering and authoritarian measures to lead them to make better choices.

[figbite]

a lot of women denigrate the sciences because they resent their own lack of interest in them. suggesting an intrinsic connection between the sciences and maleness allows them to avoid taking accountability for their own lack of intelligence and discipline so they can continue being unserious under the guise of being in tune with their womanhood or whatever

[mini-wrants]

The thing that’s always missing from the “women didn’t fight for the right to work they were already working they fought to get paid” is that many women also very much wanted to work.

Women wanted to be lawyers and engineers and chemists. They wanted to use their brains in challenging and interesting ways. They wanted to get the satisfaction from solving problems and inventing new shit and getting attention for it.

I know not everyone is born with intellectual curiosity or drive or determination but some people are and many of those people are women.

[torii-tsubaki]

「Doll's Closet」　2026　アクリル絵具・水彩／紙　315×235mm　個人蔵

[krasnoarmeyets-deactivated191907]

under my totalitarian regime being a housewife will not be allowed. you WILL become an accomplished scientist

[anjomecanico]

I highly doubt this ""lack of interest"" in STEM areas by women isn't highly, if not completely related and even directly caused, to the centuries old extensive propaganda that women are bad at math and that science is a male thing.

It is obvious to me that this stigma was presented to women since childhood and they internalized it. Also, many girls that show interest in these areas are, consciously or not by the catalysts, misdirected by other people, mostly adults, to "focus on girly things".

[scientologisabethmoss]

it’s some real rankass messaging that whenever a woman in power talks about taking pride in her job, or the challenges she has faced as a woman to rise to her current professional level, both men and women on the left start lobbing “girlboss” accusations at her. do you understand how demeaning that is??? and do you also understand that young girls can see this messaging, both online and in person, and immediately internalize that aspiring to be powerful in their chosen fields equals bad, cringe, or not progressive in some way?! it’s like your run-of-the-mill misogyny gets completely ignored because the professionally powerful women of the world, or should i say MOMMIES, are always expected to clean up this global mess, completely subvert the status quo, and somehow transform our capitalist society into a more equitable socialist one where i guess the position of leader becomes antiquated??? i swear, as someone very left of center myself, i think there is a not insubstantial number of self-proclaimed “leftists” who have reinvented the madonna-whore dichotomy, where a woman in power is either emma goldman (righteous) or margaret thatcher (evil), and there is no in between. please be so for fucking real right now.

[scientologisabethmoss]

people talk about girlboss feminism in the most deranged ways. god, i WISH girlboss feminism was as dominant a cultural force right now as it is in the delusional way some of you people talk about it. please read the room and look around you. where is sophia amoruso? what’s sheryl sandberg up to?? i don’t know because it isn’t fucking 2014 anymore! instead, we have a rapist as the united states president, a disturbing proliferation of tradwife propaganda around every fucking corner, and forced birth in the united states because a woman’s right to choose is no longer a federally protected right. if ONLY my biggest concern was rich women telling younger women and girls that they too can aspire to earn money, become professionally powerful, and be independent because we live in a global society where access to money equals power, independence, and self-autonomy. god forBID.

[uwurotting]

women are more likely to be anti-ai than men and i worry that this is going to lead to women getting left behind in the workplace, particularly in stem. if women, on average, avoid making effective use of ai, we will become increasingly unproductive relative to men, and will be more likely to get laid off or pushed into less lucrative careers, which will make us less powerful in society, and thus make society increasingly controlled by and for men.

obviously things like ai undressing women and making porn are horrible, i'm not asking anyone to support that, and for that reason i believe it's important to have women in working the field of ai, helping to regulate it and determine its moral compass. amanda askell is a woman doing just that for anthropic, and if more women follow suit, then women's wants and needs will have more of an impact in shaping ai, and shaping our world in turn.

if you are against ai because of its energy and water usage, i would reccommend doing more research and comparing it to other similar industries. its water usage is not an issue for a number of reasons, and its energy usage is comparable to similar industries, and will not be an issue once renewable energy sources are used.

even if you just hate ai on a fundamental level, it won't be going away, technology always marches on and luddites never win. i would like for women not to be on the losing side.

[paleenemyprincess]

some of the funniest reinforcements of sexism tras make has got to be be this weird attachment people make with trans women and dnb/breakcore music. like theyve pretty much become synonymous with the genre. They’ve become the head of making “good music.” 

theyre basically reinforcing that people with penises are the specific reason why music in this genre sound exceptionally good 🤨🤨 get the fuck outta here

Its so interesting because ive never seen trans men get appreciated or seen as the head of excelling at something in the capacity people make towards these autogenophiles LOL

[uwurotting]

"men are logical, scientific, and technological; women are intuitive, nurturing, and compassionate" is still a sexist belief even if you add "and these are both equally important" or even "and this makes women better than men".

[markovchaingang]

every time there's another post about how science is malebrained and the superior feminine way of understanding the world is via bullshit woo i like to imagine a 1920s misogynist nodding along thoughtfully whilst stroking his beard

[maidthings]

the year is 2026 we are moving past calling random quirky behaviours male for no fucking reason.

[maidthings]

"men love reading the wikipedia article for something while they-" men love looking out upon a world and seeing naught but ash. ash beneath their feet, ash in their bellies, ash in front of and behind their eyes. they love it so much.

[drbased]

Imagine if we started saying women should have their own sports leagues, chess leagues etc because we’re superior mentally and physically. They’d be flying in so fast to disprove us lmao

[drbased]

Of course, there’d be two camps - edgy mras and those sympathetic to maleness would be quick to ‘well actually 🤓’ us with stats about male and female physiology, whilst tras would lecture us about cissexism, whilst conveniently ignoring the obvious ‘cissexism’ of the mras. Both groups would bravely put aside their differences to own the ‘terfs’

[nunchler]

obviously bigotry isnt rational but "women are naturally worse at spatial reasoning and math" is a wild opinion to have when women have historically been the primary textile producers in a lot of societies. have you ever seen a tablet weaving pattern

[notsoanonymousfemcel]

leftist men are still misogynists

one thing that keeps bothering me is the left’s (mostly men’s) obsession with the idea that a family can’t survive on a single income anymore. the argument is usually framed as a critique of capitalism: labor rights have been crushed, wages haven’t kept up, workers aren’t prioritized. and like, yes, that part is true. capital has absolutely refused to raise wages, and it loves to hide behind women’s liberation as an excuse, “now there are two incomes, so why pay more?” i get the sentiment, and i understand why this framing is used to pull in people who are hostile to marxism by appealing to something familiar and nostalgic. but what drives me insane is that the left rarely interrogates what that “single income family” actually meant. instead, they recycle 1950s imagery with this vague “what they took from us” energy, as if that era wasn’t built on women’s economic dependence and enforced domestic labor. a single-income household wasn’t just a wage arrangement; it was a power structure. it trapped women in marriages they couldn’t leave, tied survival to men’s employment, and made widowhood, abandonment, and abuse into economic death sentences. when leftists romanticize this model, they’re not thinking about the women who outlived their husbands with no savings, no work history, no autonomy. they’re not thinking about women in violent relationships with no income of their own and no exit. they’re not thinking about how capitalism relied on unpaid reproductive labor in the home to function in the first place. pretending this was some lost golden age just reinstates an oppressive system with better branding.

it’s especially telling whose struggles get erased in this framing. if the left actually wanted to talk about single incomes under capitalism, they should be centering single mothers (especially single mothers of color) who are already surviving on one income and being crushed by it. these women aren’t a hypothetical or a nostalgic memory; they’re living proof of how brutal capitalism is when you’re responsible for care work and denied adequate wages, housing, childcare, and social support. instead of learning from them, the left ignores them in favor of a straight, white, male breadwinner fantasy that never applied to most people in the first place.i agree that workers deserve higher wages and security. i agree that capitalism has made life unlivable. but if the left’s critique stops at “we used to afford a family on one income,” then it’s incomplete and patriarchal as hell. we need a vision that doesn’t rely on nostalgia for women’s dependence. i don’t have a neat solution here. i’m just venting, but every time i see those posts, i feel like screaming.

Patreon:

ranting about what i keep seeing on x | not so anonymous femcel

Get more from not so anonymous femcel on Patreon