stop blaming obi-wan kenobi for anakin skywalkerās fall: understanding accountability in complex relationships
thereās something thatās been frustrating me for a long time about the way we talk about obi-wan kenobi and anakin skywalker, especially in online discourse. namely, the persistent idea that obi-wan is in some way responsible for anakinās turn to the dark side, that by not stopping him, not being āenough,ā not seeing the signs, obi-wan enabled his fall and thus shares the blame for darth vaderās birth. i want to unpack why this reading is not just flawed in terms of character analysis and canon, but also why it echoes real-world patterns of excusing destructive behavior by blaming the people around it.
at its core, this idea that obi-wan āfailedā anakin is harmful, because it echoes the logic we use to guilt victims and survivors of emotionally abusive or manipulative relationships. obi-wan and anakin were not equals in their emotional dynamic. they were master and apprentice, yes, but the power imbalance went both ways, anakin, who had been told since childhood that he was the āchosen one,ā carried a narcissistic streak that grew as he did. he was entitled, he was possessive, and he struggled to take responsibility for his own emotions or decisions. obi-wan, for his part, was patient, cautious, deeply dutiful, and often emotionally reserved, but never malicious or neglectful.
and yet, people argue that obi-wan āletā anakin fall. that he āshould have known.ā but hereās the truth, anakinās descent was not caused by a lack of love or oversight. it was caused by anakinās choices. obi-wan didnāt plant the seeds of jealousy, fear, or violence in him. palpatine did. anakinās attachment issues did. the jedi orderās flawed dogma did. but obi-wan? he spent his life trying to guide him, trying to connect with him, trying to save him. and in the end, he blamed himself when it all fell apart.
and thatās one of the most painfully real things about obi-wan kenobiās character, he internalizes the blame for something he never caused. thatās what emotionally manipulative dynamics do. they make the people who gave everything feel like it was never enough. they convince the loyal ones that they failed. it is not only inaccurate to say obi-wan is to blame, it is cruel.
some people argue that because obi-wan stayed by anakinās side, didnāt report him, didnāt force him to change, that he is somehow complicit. but that logic is flawed. we cannot hold people responsible for the actions of those who ultimately betray them. we cannot expect a friend, a mentor, or even a brother to save someone who refuses to be saved. the idea that someone like obi-wan should have known, should have stopped it, is a harmful narrative we often apply to people whoāve survived toxic relationships in real life, āwhy didnāt you leave?ā āwhy didnāt you stop them?ā āwhy didnāt you see it coming?ā as if foresight could rewrite fate. as if love alone could fix someone bent on self-destruction.
and itās not just about emotional abuse, itās also about envy. anakin was jealous of obi-wan. from attack of the clones to revenge of the sith. he felt like obi-wan was the jedi ideal, respected, composed, everything anakin was told to be but could never fully become. and anakin hated that, even as he craved obi-wanās approval. itās a toxic cycle. itās also worth saying that obi-wan clearly loved anakin, in his own way. he told him he was like a brother. he fought for him again and again. and anakin still turned on him.
did anakin care for obi-wan? at some point, yes. but did he deserve him? no. and thatās the heart of this. anakin skywalker did not deserve obi-wan kenobi. and no amount of tragedy or pain can make that untrue. obi-wan didnāt betray anakin. anakin betrayed obi-wan.
now, this doesnāt mean we have to hate anakin. i donāt. i think heās fascinating. i think heās one of the most layered characters in the franchise. but i also think we need to stop treating that complexity like an excuse. just because a character is compelling doesnāt mean we should defend their actions. i love watching director krennic and darth maul. i find them compelling, tragic, interesting. but i would never justify what they did. and the same should be true for anakin skywalker.
ultimately, it is important to remember that this is the internet, and encountering differing opinions is both inevitable and, in the grand scheme of things, this issue is not that serious. itās entirely acceptable to disagree. personally, i find anakin skywalker to be a brilliantly crafted character, his complexity, flaws, and arc make him compelling, and as evident from my previous posts, iāve never expressed any grave issue with him. at the end of the day, he is a fictional figure, and like many others, i enjoy writing about him and engaging with his story simply because heās an interesting and important part of the star wars universe.
yousharknotpass
discoholicmusic
origamiaround
vaporwave
s-u-f-j-a-n-s-t-e-v-e-n-s
pixelskylines
