If you're anything like me, you'll know that sometimes your mind can be your own worst enemy.
Most of us have times that our mind can't settle - times when we're prone to making just about every 'thinking error' in the book. Catastrophising, jumping to worst conclusions, making generalisations that are unhelpful, being highly self-critical etc. We might find ourselves increasingly focusing on the negative side of life and feeling pessimistic.
When this happens we'll often give more thought to negative situations in our lives. We might think of all the things that could go wrong at work next month, or dwell on the times we've been treated badly in the past. Then it's easy to get stuck in a loop of unhelpful thinking. Roughly speaking, when you focus on the negative, your mood becomes lower, and so you focus more on the negative things. Boom...
The human brain has an inbuilt bias that tends to veer towards focusing on 'negatives', and this is just part of how the human brain seems to work. We also have a tendency to notice the bits of information that support our state of mind (and so 'the way we see the world'). This means, for example, that if we are in a bad mood we're more likely to remember any unfriendly interactions when we visit our local town. Dwelling on these unfriendly interactions will reinforce our low mood and may reinforce an idea that "other people are rude to me", and over time this becomes a fixed prediction for how people are likely to treat me in future. (And so our negative predictions begin to colour future interactions).
In scenarios like this, friendly social interactions are more likely to be ignored, and we'll assign more focus and attention to the negative experiences we have. These become 'proof' of our theory about others.
This kind of inbuilt cognitive bias plays a big part in therapy too. In therapy sessions sometimes people will say "I want to be happy" - something I can definitely understand. But it is a fact that our brains are not evolved to produce happiness but to focus on survival. Problem-solving has been the chief concern of the human brain for all of our evolutionary history. The main goal of the brain is to solve potential problems, to automate tasks and take the need for conscious thinking out of as many of our daily tasks as possible, and to make 'predictions' to ensure we survive.
This means we have natural default settings in our minds that ensure we allocate much more attention to problems than we do to situations which go according to plan. It is because of this tendency to focus on solving problems (above, say, counting our blessings), that our perceptions of the world can become quite skewed, often to the pessimistic side of things.
Hans Rosling (a Swedish researcher) quite famously demonstrated this tendency in a piece of research in 2013. His research asked the question: " Has the percentage of the world population that lives in extreme poverty almost doubled, almost halved or stayed the same over the past 20 years?" Only 5% of respondents correctly answered that poverty has actually halved. Our bias towards pessimism or a negative appraisal of situations sometimes means we can be really, really wrong... In fact, this is the case with almost every quality-of-life metric. Things have improved so much in the last fifty years, and yet the sense of pessimism remains high.
Like moths to a flame, we seem to be particularly drawn to 'problems' in all forms. In 2014 a study at McGill University examined people's consumption of written news media and looked at the stories participants chose to read in what they thought was an eye-tracking experiment. What the results showed was that even the participants who said they wanted more good news stories were much more drawn to 'negative news content'. And in the absence of any sizeable problems, our minds will often work overtime to create some new ones - to find some new angle, some new (hitherto unimportant) issue on which to rest our attention and focus our concerns.
This is partly due to "prevalence-induced concept change", a theory that suggests that as the prevalence of a problem is reduced, humans are naturally inclined to redefine and broaden the nature of 'problems' themselves. This means that as things improve all around us, our definition of 'bad news' is just widened to find new things that are bad to report on. We recast our 'problems' and simply discover a load more of them. I suppose this is far more common in the developed, capitalist, liberal West (where to some extent the 'problems' that have made life miserable for countless generations before the last several have now been solved) than in developing nations. And so we see a recasting of 'problems' in new and unresolvable directions, one example being the current obsessional focus on 'identity politics'.
Closer to home, I recently spent many hours looking at YouTube reviews for a new iPhone, obsessing about a choice between LCD or OLED screens as though something serious depended on my choice (both screens are far better than anything remotely possible even five years ago - and both are effectively identical to the normal eye). Perhaps it fills the time in the absence of survival-critical problems...
We are also subject to something called "availability bias". This bias was noted in a study by Tversky and Kahneman in the 1970's, whereby respondents seriously overestimated the frequency of crime, due to the overwhelming reporting of crime on the news. Random violence or sudden, explosive bad things make the news because they shock and happen suddenly. Good news - such as acts of kindness - are common and tend to form part of the clement background conditions in which life unfolds. The good news doesn't have the power to make a sudden splash that changes perceptions that, say, warfare, accidents or disasters have. Bad news is sudden and explosive, and so is exaggerated in our minds. Real tragedies are thankfully rare, but never in history has each tragedy had such global coverage.
So, bad news arrives in ways that are far more eye-catching than good news. Then our mind focuses on problem-solving in ways that exclude more positive appraisals of the situation. In evolutionary terms, it simply makes sense for us to dwell more on risks.
Add to this that people tend to think in relative and not absolute terms. It matters how you are doing compared to others around you, far more than it matters how you are doing in a general sense. This is why, whatever goal we reach, we experience a short burst of euphoria before quickly resetting and then taking for granted our new situations. It's why, for example, acquiring a new car only brings temporary satisfaction, before the problem becomes, say, a small scratch we've noticed on the rear bumper. It's why a big promotion and pay rise quickly leads to wondering whether the person next to you was given an even bigger pay rise. When things get better in our lives, this relativizing behaviour means we quickly reset our expectations and focus on the next set of problems.
During my years trading derivatives, I remember we would leave the trading floor and go to one of the pubs in Leadenhall Market after the close of the trading day. One topic always came up - "losing trades". You'll always find traders talking at great length about losing trades. In fact, many traders remember their losing trades and losing days for far longer than they remember profitable days. It's the days that everything goes against you that stick in your mind.
This is a long way round of saying that it's actually very hard to overcome your tendency to dwell on the negative side of things! People often say "I don't want to feel so negative about everything", and it's useful to understand that your brain is doing what it is evolved to do.
But this can be debilitating if it runs unchecked. We can try and counter this tendency and bring some balance to our inner-lives, and it is possible to take steps in this direction. There's lots of way of approaching this, but here are some questions you can ask yourself if you find yourself stuck in a cycle of negative thinking. You can check your thinking by asking:
Where is the evidence for my belief(s)?
What impact is this way of thinking having on me?
Am I jumping to conclusions?
Is there any evidence to disprove my belief?
Am I concentrating on my weaknesses, and neglecting my strengths?
Am I taking things too personally?
Am I thinking in all-or-nothing terms?
Am I overstating the chances of something bad happening?
Am I predicting the outcome instead of experimenting with it?
Am I expecting total perfection?
Am I being open to evidence that 'disproves' my worst fears?
If I had to come up with a more balanced/helpful belief, what would this belief be?
If you have a problem situation in your life, you can try sitting down somewhere and taking twenty minutes to write out answers to these questions. Really explore your own style of thinking. If you spend some time doing this, you'll begin to condition yourself to avoid getting stuck in a spiral of negative thinking and hopefully more able to take a balanced view of your life.
www.whitestonetherapy.com