For a century and a half, The New York Times has been earnestly—and hilariously—defining topical terms.Â
Let's bring back "macking."
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Phantogram Three
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
untitled
noise dept.
$LAYYYTER
official daine visual archive
cherry valley forever
EXPECTATIONS
NASA
Fai_Ryy
KIROKAZE
occasionally subtle
Not today Justin
Cosimo Galluzzi

Origami Around

ellievsbear
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

tannertan36
Game of Thrones Daily

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Azerbaijan
seen from Malaysia
seen from Belgium

seen from Austria
seen from United States
seen from Maldives

seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Taiwan

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Austria
@wordsintotime-blog
For a century and a half, The New York Times has been earnestly—and hilariously—defining topical terms.Â
Let's bring back "macking."
Katie Paterson’s century-long Future Library art project contemplates the full scale of the publishing process.
"The project foregrounds the most easily or willfully forgotten part of bookmaking: the trees. A bound book sits at a far remove from the natural world it came from—Future Library reminds us of the geographical realities of publishing, of the time and resources necessary to make paper. And as, presumably, digital media will continue to proliferate over the next century, Paterson’s art is resolutely, provocatively analog: every part of its process is tethered to the physical world. A visitor in Oslo can stand in the library and point to the source of the paper."
The New York Times admits to its struggles with subject-verb agreement.
"You know the form that you normally use? Well, it’s the other one that’s grammatically correct. So shape up. Or prepare to feel the kiss of the lash."