Design Instruction?
This post aims to share my process during an architectural design (especially for works in my Chises university).
After getting the topographic map of my work, I will firstly read the whole map and conduct a site analysis to sort out the various elements of the place. Factors may be the traffic flow of the site - the flow of people on various roads around the site, the possible routes that the main users may use to reach the building, the roads for vehicles or only for people, etc.; or the vicinity of the site including the wind direction of the environment in which the site is located, the condition of the sunshine, the conditions of surrounding buildings (altitude, mass, distance to your site), the greening around the site... There are many things can be analyzed, so the best choice is to draw analysis diagrams on sulfuric acid paper, which can also form a comprehensive analysis including various factors after stacking together. It can take some time to do th site analysis, but you can gain a deeper understanding of the place during the process, and it’s likely that the idea of the plan naturally arises during the analysis. For example, analyzing the flow of the site can help draw the building entrances and exits, which came to some of the characteristics of the total planar shaple, such as concave emphasis on the entrance. Another example is the application of emphasizing the plants around the site.
In addition, the geometry of the site - such as the shape of the site boundary and even the grid delineated to avoid certain trees in the site to determine the plane composition is also a common practice.
With initial ideas, whether they are only on the general plane or are in three-dimensional form, they can be combined with the actual requirements of the mission statement to the general function of the partition. Of course, it is also feasible to generate a general functional partition according to the requirements of the building type. It is also feasible to determine the architectural outline/stereoscopic appereance according to the characteristics of the site. The design from the functional zoning bubble diagram is one such thind.
The scrutiny of the program should be repeated back and forth between the three-dimentional models and the plane sketches. As for the medium of the model, the SketchUp model is inherently quick and agile, but the lack of binocular imaging and the weakness of the SLI engine lead to a lack of stereosonicity, the loss of the sense of scale due to the arbitrary scaling of the model, and the lack of mastery of modeling methods limitations are all computer models for beginners.
As for the facade design, it is usually involved in the middle of the program. And the most important factors are the actual density, bump advance and retreat, light and shadow and materials. These factors are often associated with the function of the corresponding plane, otherwise it is only a more fake “skin”. However, it’s also suggested that the introduction of counterplan design considerations in schemes as soon as possible. If the function and mass scale take too much time, it will inevitably become passive and not easily deenpened for the facade design because it will become in a hurry. The same is true for site design.














