hi welcome to m y blog. i post rhythm game and or other things
iidx 8th dan / sdvx lv. 10
i have a webbed site:
welcome to the audion galaxy
tumblr dot com
Sweet Seals For You, Always
wallacepolsom

Product Placement

Kaledo Art

Origami Around
dirt enthusiast
KIROKAZE

titsay
ojovivo
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
i don't do bad sauce passes
Xuebing Du
Jules of Nature
cherry valley forever

Love Begins

Janaina Medeiros
Misplaced Lens Cap
seen from Russia
seen from T1
seen from Kyrgyzstan

seen from India
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
@absolute-luna-c
hi welcome to m y blog. i post rhythm game and or other things
iidx 8th dan / sdvx lv. 10
i have a webbed site:
welcome to the audion galaxy
I love them so i drew them
Application ID 20260135623
Quantum Transceiver Antenna and Method for Construction
Applicant: Q-Net, LLC
Okay so I spent literal hours doing research on this to figure out if it was viable, only to discover that the two listed inventors, Marianne Veronika Sandor and Edward Michael Porrazzo, had their assets frozen by the SEC and were subsequently fined over $1.2 million for fraud related to a similar claimed invention back in 2018. In short, they claimed their “quantum transducer” would serve as a revolutionary 3D technology for tablets, backing their statements with expired patents and technologies that either didn’t exist or were manufactured by unrelated companies. They then funneled over half of the investor funds raised from these fraudulent claims into their own accounts, spending it in comically lavish ways, as shown below.
Moddha is the name of the company they used for this fraud.
With that in mind, let’s look at the paragraph that gave me the greatest pause when looking at this.
All in all, this paragraph seems to misrepresent basic facts about antennas in an effort to further its own claims. For example, as I’m typing this, I’m getting cell phone signal in a closed-off room, which this implies shouldn’t be possible. In the same vein, basic TV antennas have been usable inside for decades, and the same goes for radios. Yes, the reception indoors is going to be worse than outdoors, but in most buildings you’ll still get decent reception unless you’re underground, near the center of a larger building, or in a Faraday Cage.
While I can’t make a definitive claim of fraud with respect to this application, the history of the inventors and the misrepresentation of fact don’t really look great. And that’s just from the stuff I understand; there may very well be fundamental problems with the quantum mechanics as well.