Giorgia Bellotti
No title available

titsay
Show & Tell
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Misplaced Lens Cap

izzy's playlists!
Mike Driver
macklin celebrini has autism
Not today Justin
todays bird
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

gracie abrams

Love Begins

@theartofmadeline
noise dept.
YOU ARE THE REASON
🪼

No title available
Noah Kahan
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from South Africa

seen from Malaysia

seen from Libya
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from India

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
@alterspit
Giorgia Bellotti
Ghost in the Altar Room
Hey, you! Whoever you are!
Do you identify with a particular ideological or political group? have you ever seen your ideological/political opposition write about your group, and thought “what bullshit, that’s not what we’re about at all. they’re lying”
As it turns out, fucking everyone does that! Including your group and the way it talks about your opposition!
If you want to know literally anything about your ideological opponents (something that is essential if you want to criticise them), you need to learn what they are from THEM! You need to read THEIR writing about themselves. If you wonder “why do they do [blank]”, you need to ask THEM that.
Obviously, people against immigration don’t want to address what happens to the boats they turn around, or the refugees who can’t escape their authoritarian country. That is where your own ideology’s writing comes in handy - addressing the things your opponents want to ignore. but if your ideology is telling you “the opponent believes … [seemingly surface-level beliefs]” that should be a red flag! Only your opponent should be trusted to explain their surface-level beliefs and justifications.
Read your opponent’s ideological writings - check their sources, of course (as you should ALWAYS do, even and especially for your own ideology).
You should have the skills to identify errors and false claims made in their arguments. You should not rely on others for basic critical thinking. You should see, first-hand and from the source material, the flaws of a belief before doubtlessly believing their existence. Do not let people lie to you about what the opponent believes.
Do not let government, profiteers, and politicians trick you into believing lies and propaganda with no effort whatsoever besides using leftist-speak or queer-speak or freedom-speak etc. The truth lies between both statements, and if you don’t want to live in a world where we are all strawmen and lies and only understand others as strawmen and lies then you need to search for the truth.
❈ Grim Aesthetics ❈