| America's Liberty |

I love my country... I hate what it's government has become.

[sw1tchbackli]

[jardinssteve]

[oldinfidel]

[crabs-and-bedbugs]

Black guy drunk driving in an Escalade runs from the police. He t-bones a Honda Civic while going 130mph and kills all five teenage girls inside. He gets out of the wreck unharmed and runs on foot to a gaggle of young white women who then try to protect him from the cops.

Saying "oh he was here with us all night", and when that doesn't work they try to physically stop the cops, screaming "ACAB".

God help me, I'm starting to become racist against white women

[the-davest-of-uncles]

White leftist women are retarded.

[locked-keye]

[hst3000]

...We just throwing out innocent until proven guilty then? The Untouchable defends the public murderer and the family man falsely accused of assult, or the struggling single woman wrongly blamed for theft.

[emmaubler]

"We rightly agreed to the principle of rights, but it's so icky to actualy help people exercise them! The government is corrupt and obviously ACAB but also defending someone against a charge made by these bodies should result in instant shunning by the community!"

[locked-keye]

Actually what I'm saying is the public defenders are mostly insane and we should consider that not dealing with their obvious disregard for what their real job is (ensuring the trial is fair) in favor of "get the accused off no matter what" is a threat to the public good.

[hst3000]

I'm not convinced 'ensure the trial is fair' and 'get the accused off no matter what' look different when done to someone's best ability.

The defense's job is to defend. This involves providing alternate theories to the facts of the case, showing where there is doubt, doing everything they can to make sure the prosecution's case has to be strong.

You seem to be saying 'well yes they need to be defended but not TOO hard.'

[getawarrant]

If the rights of the guilty person you hate aren't protected, then the rights of the innocent person you love can be that much more easily trampled.

[americas-liberty]

It's not an attorneys job to make sure the trial is fair. That's what the judge is for. The defense and prosecution alike will do anything they can to prove their case, sometimes toeing right up to the edge of legality.

[theredqueendom]

For those who still don't get it. http://www.facebook.com/pages/p/102416041800702

[americas-liberty]

I still say the pic on the left looks staged.

[sawbuckplus]

[donateliferecipient]

[1americanconservative]

Sidney Powell exposed that a Dominion contract explicitly includes a clause which permits election staff to adjust the tally based on a review of scanned ballot images, a provision that creates a direct pathway for human intervention to alter vote counts after initial scanning, bypassing the integrity of the original ballots.

The Dominion system also incorporates a hidden backdoor feature, intentionally engineered for outside manipulation by anyone with access, as confirmed in affidavits and Powell's disclosures from a military intelligence source detailing its origins in Venezuelan rigging under Hugo Chávez.

These are built-in mechanism that enables real-time vote flipping, injection, or VOTE DELETION without any kind of detection, precisely the kind of silent, deniable corruption designed to steal elections while maintaining the facade of legitimacy.

Sidney taught us that this system originated in Venezuela under Hugo Chavez to guarantee he never lost another election again, delivering him victories before spreading the software to Argentina, other South American nations, and finally the United States.

This foreign-owned technology brazenly violated presidential orders against foreign election interference, with votes processed on servers in Spain and Germany.

An affidavit from a military officer confirms the software was built precisely for rigging elections, allowing dictators to hold power indefinitely.

The globalist web of tech giants, media empires, and corporations has profited for decades from these dictator installed regimes.

Exposing this will shatter rigged elections worldwide and purge the deep corruption President Trump was elected to destroy.

Pray hard for him and for the warriors fighting to reveal the truth, and for America. God hears us but the battle is far from over.

[feminismisstillahatemovement]

[idiosyncraticrednebula]

Speaking of loyalty and love, I just heard of this story of a woman who kidnapped a gang leader's mother because he kidnapped her husband. On one hand, it's messed up that mother had to go through that because of her son's actions, but on the other hand, DAMN that's a gangsta ass woman right here.

[terrific-togekiss]

Mexico kidnap victim's wife: 'Your mother for my husband'

The wife of a man taken by a Mexican gang holds the gang boss's mother captive, proposing a swap.

[bowlby4]

[zombieranger13]

If Iran bombed the White House and caused regime change, I don’t think most Americans would be that upset about paying them 300 billion!!

[generallemarc]

"I would rather support the country where blasphemy is punishable by death than admit that hating Trump has limits"-the American left

[americas-liberty]

If another country killed a sitting president, ANY president, we'd bomb them to the stone age. Look at 9/11. For a short time we were all united and ready blow crap up, and we did.

[1americanconservative]

[1americanconservative]

[amagi2000]

Spicoli: “All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I’m fine” ... until I whine like a little bitch about about being taxed by a thieving mooselimb commie.

[greater-than-the-sword]

Every so often someone comes along and tries to convince a blog called "greater than the sword" with "stubborn idealism" in their tagline that free speech isn't worth it and the only effective way to deal with ideological malefactors in society is kill them

[brantheblessed]

The left understand force doctrine better. We need to stop being so polite.

The gun is greater than the pen

[recoiloperated]

Violence is the final recourse of the Just and the first choice of the depraved branny boy. You don't kill every dog because one is rabid, and even putting down the rabid dog is more an act of mercy than of punishment.

[lordascapelion]

These people who never fought a day in their lives are forgetting why people aren’t constantly pushing to violence whenever they don’t get their way:

It is, in fact, possible to fucking lose.

And when you initiate violence and lose, the consequences you will face will be a million times worse than the state you were in before you initiated violence.

The sentiment of “our opponents are a bunch of cowards who will fold like origami the second we pull our guns out” is pretty common among people who were brainrotted by politics. It never occurs to them that their opponents will actually shoot back.

[aardvarkingmad]

Yeah. the dipshits (on all sides) who are not-so-quietly gloating over the possibility of an actual, honest-to-God, hot shooting civil war are fools and idiots, one and all. While it is possible to recognize that current events suggest that an actual violent conflict is possible, nobody with any sense *wants* it to happen.

I've seen that aggressively, abysmally, arrogantly stupid view (that our enemies are cowards who will fold like origami the second we pull our guns out) from both left and right. And they are ALL wrong. You don't know how your enemy will react when the balloon goes up. Hell, most people don't know how THEY will react when faced with violence.

All we know for sure is that violence is sudden, brutal, messy and scary as hell. And when it's not just two guys fighting, or a couple of street gangs duking it out, but anywhere between hundred and millions of citizens trying to murder one another, it's going to be horrific.

Yes, there are lots of people who are prepared (to various degrees of reality) for civil unrest. And they exist on both sides, and in the most surprising places. And one of the foremost principles in military theory is that "no plan survives contact with the enemy." You may think you know how a civil war will play out, but the enemy gets a vote, too, and he wants to win (and crush you, his enemy) just as much as you do.

A civil war would kill millions, and not just from first-order violence. Power failures, starvation, thirst, disease, wildfires...take your pick. Civilization depends on a lot of delicate systems working near perfectly ALL THE TIME to keep everyone warm/cool, fed, etc. Widespread violence and warfare tends to disrupt those delicate systems even when they're not trying to do so--and both sides WILL be trying to do so...to their enemies. It will be ugly, destructive, and the consequences will last long after the conflict ends.

[euronymous4e]

"When was the last time you went without food for a day and how did that feel?" is a question these keyboard revolutionaries never answer.

[americas-liberty]

Not to mention the fallout afterwards even if you win. If you've ever been to a country after a major conflict and see the destruction and misery, you never want that at home.

Yay, we won. We get to rule over ashes and rubble

[sawbuckplus]

[siryouarebeingmocked]

I like how his le epic own quote isn't an actual counterpoint.

And most of the rest of the video is people clapping like trained seals. Presumably so other left-wing people will feel smug.

[the-davest-of-uncles]

Democrats and socialists (pardon the redundancy) believe all your money belongs to them, and they benevolently and generously let you keep a little bit.