As we take some time at the end of this hectic semester to reflect on the unique positionalities weāve developed as nature interpreters, the personal ethics we each bring to this final discussion are greatly influenced by our individual set of experiences, perspectives, and beliefs.
Likewise, as someone particularly passionate about wildlife conservation, itās hardly any surprise that my ethics as an interpreter are fundamentally centred around inspiring curiosity and care for the environment. Moreover, since my past experiences working with children have been incredibly fulfilling, I connect more with interpreting nature for children rather than adults.
So, as we undertake our new roles as environmental interpreters, what personally motivates each of us to carry out this type of work? What drives us to facilitate emotionally and intellectually meaningful nature experiences for others?
My primary motivation as a nature interpreter ultimately boils down to a personal conviction to empower younger generations and inspire hope for a more sustainable future!
As we've explored in various units, interpreters can offer audiences new ways of perceiving the natural world through a range of unique lenses to heighten their appreciation and understanding of nature (Beck et al., 2018). Most importantly, if carried out responsibly, interpretation can be an indispensable tool in facilitating environmental stewardship (Beck et al., 2018).
Looking back on my first blog post, where I reflected on how my relationship with nature has evolved throughout my life, my earliest experiences with nature greatly impacted my perception of and interest in the natural sciences. Accordingly, when working with children, I believe itās crucial to recognize the significant impact that childhood experiences have on the outlooks we carry into adulthood.
Children are incredibly impressionable, and as Rodenburg (2019) points out, while young children may not be cognitively ready for serious discussions on important environmental issues, they are always eager to embrace the wonders of the natural world. That's precisely why, as interpreters, a key responsibility is to create fun, engaging, but ultimately positive learning experiences in nature, offering a spark that can be fanned and developed as children grow into adults (Beck et al., 2018).
After all, environmentally responsible children make for environmentally responsible adults (Beck et al., 2018)! In this way, nature interpreters serve as agents of change, influencing the planet's future by interpreting nature to children of today (Beck et al., 2018).
Yet, as you can imagine, cultivating hope to create lasting positive change is much easier said than done.
As our world grows increasingly urban and anthropocentric, prioritizing technology or innovation over natural resource stewardship, many children have grown disconnected from their natural surroundings (Gienger et al., 2024; Rodenburg, 2019). In a way, environmental educators are primarily responsible for tackling āNature-Deficit Disorder.ā How so? By building interpretive programs that allow children of all ages to nurture their relationship with nature and learn how to interact with their natural surroundings in a respectful yet personally meaningful way.
On a similar note, nature interpreters and other environmental educators are responsible for teaching children environmental literacy, directly or indirectly enabling younger audiences to adopt eco-conscious behaviours/ perspectives early in life (Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2024). I believe exploring our innate interconnectedness with nature can be a highly effective yet often overlooked approach for introducing youth to the critical interplay between human activities, ecological systems, and the changing climate (Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2024).
Additionally, since I have a background in biology, I would love the opportunity to challenge children to use their scientific knowledge to think critically about how we rely on nature in our everyday lives and the ripple effect human actions create in different natural environments/ ecosystems.
As we develop our ethics as nature interpreters, we're accountable for making our services available to everyone. Therefore, a core obligation as nature interpreters is to ensure that our programs can effectively reach a wide range of audiences. Whether you start by acknowledging how privilege shapes oneās responses/ relationship with nature, identifying socioeconomic barriers that prevent certain groups of people from accessing your program, or creating multisensory experiences that cater to a range of learning styles, interpretive services must be made as accessible as possible.
So, what approach to nature interpretation would work best for me as an individual?
As someone who's always been interested in both art and science, I would love to work in a setting where I can combine my two greatest passions in life. From a creative standpoint, I really value art's ability to resonate with audiences on a deeply emotional and personal level. As discussed in previous blog posts, art can be incredibly thought-provoking and convey deep truths that transcend the constraints of words. We also know nature interpretation involves a balance of entertainment, enlightenment, and information, whereby art can help effectively connect facts to feelings (Beck et al., 2018). In contrast, science offers insight into fascinating natural phenomena, enabling audiences to develop an informed perception of their natural surroundings. Science can also effectively cultivate awe and ignite curiosity in audiences, especially when combined with enthusiasm/ visual or auditory components that engage with audiences through multiple senses.
Here's a short clip from one of Bill Nye's science education programs on rocks and soil. If I were to seriously consider a profession in environmental education/ interpretation, I'd draw a great deal of inspiration from his approach. His enthusiastic tone, creative skits, comedic storytelling, and use of sound effects, make learning about science exciting for younger audiences (at least it did when I was in elementary school)! Using the format of a kid's television program also highlights an effective way to combine art and science in nature interpretation. Better yet, this approach shows how we can use technology to our advantage as a means to reach wider audiences/ classrooms all over the world.
Video retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HQwYbwmyaY&list=PL1LHolB1n6e4x5Zq7vtuVlzFNGr0beE7n&index=4
Here's a clip from Bill Nye's science education program on evolution. In this video, Bill does a great job of addressing a more serious topic related to how human actions impact the environment (aligning with my personal ethics) while maintaining an engaging/ entertaining tone suitable for kids.
Video retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbrVxrsBLuw&list=PL1LHolB1n6e4x5Zq7vtuVlzFNGr0beE7n&index=25
So, do we share similar personal ethics as nature interpreters? What was the best insight or most eye-opening experience that you gained from this course?
Overall, I had a blast connecting with all of you each week through these blog post submissions. We had some really enlightening discussions! This course has allowed me to reflect on my relationship with nature in ways I had never imagined, and for that, I'm forever grateful.
Beck, L., T. T. Cable, & D. M. Knudson. (2018).Ā Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage: For a Better World. Sagamore Venture.
Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2024). Toward a National Framework for Environmental Learning: Discussion Paper. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/corporate/transparency/consultations/national-framework-environmental-learning/discussion-paper.html
Gienger, A., Nursey-Bray, M., Rodger, D., Szorenyi, A., Weinstein, P., Hanson-Easey, S., ⦠Yoneyama, S. (2024). Responsible environmental education in the Anthropocene: understanding and responding to young peopleās experiences of nature disconnection, eco-anxiety and ontological insecurity.Ā Environmental Education Research,Ā 30(9), 1619ā1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2367022
Rodenburg, J. (2019). Why Environmental Educators Shouldnāt Give Up Hope. Clearing Magazine. https://clearingmagazine.org/archives/14300