I think the manās art about having his friends describe him is very interesting, but I do not think it proves the point he was trying to make. He used his art to show that slavery still has prominent effects in modern times, which is a completely valid statement; however, I disagree with his method of supporting this claim. He had his friends describe him as though he had gone missing, and they needed to create a missing poster for him. His friends described his physical characteristics, such as his race, gender, height, and hair style. This description was similar to runaway slave posters, however, I do not think that they were similar because of underlying biasesāI think that they were similar because both descriptions had the same goal of identifying and locating a missing person. If I were to go missing, my friends and family would also describe me by my physical characteristics. They would say that I am a white female, that I am 5ā4ā, and that I have brown hair that goes just past my shoulders. This is a similar type of description to the description the artistās friends gave, and yet I am Caucasian, and a history of American slavery does not likely have an impact on a description of me.
Thus, while the statement the artist makes is valid, I do not think he can prove it through his method of gathering descriptions of himself in such a way. If he had simply asked his friends to describe him, and they focused solely on his physical descriptions, then he would have more of a compelling argument. However, since he specifically asked his friends to describe him as though he had gone missing, I do not believe that their focus on his physical selfāand the similarities that his description had to those of other men of his race in the pastāactually shows that a history of slavery had any impact on how his friends described him.