Monterey Bay Aquarium

shark vs the universe
🪼
d e v o n
Keni
No title available
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
RMH

tannertan36
almost home

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

oozey mess
No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi
noise dept.
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Mike Driver
sheepfilms
The Bowery Presents
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia
seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from Egypt

seen from Belgium
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from Croatia
seen from Laos
seen from United States

seen from Colombia

seen from United States
@answersquestionsnsuch
It's a beautiful day in the Senate and you are Brutus
[id in alt]
Tumblr needed to see this
The reason Lord of the Rings’ special effects have held up so well and still look so gorgeous- especially in the backgrounds and environments– is because they weren’t **trying** to be realistic.
LOTR’s special effects are stylized in a very careful, deliberate, and beautiful way.
In a behind-the-scenes video, the films’ visual effects supervisor explained:
We wanted the look of the film to have this storybook look to it. This is one of the things that Peter Jackson would impress upon the post-grader. He would literally sit there with watercolor (paintings) and say: THIS is what I want it to look like.”
Compare Alan Lee’s watercolor painting (its texture, its limited and unreal color palette, and the careful use of bright highlights in specific places that “frame” the characters/create an interesting composition)–
To the very similar look of the final film:
Because the goal wasn’t to create a perfectly realistic version of Moria. It was to create a version of Moria that looked like a watercolor painting.
And this “watercolor painting” effect isn’t just epic fantasy moments either. Even many of the non-fantastical backgrounds in Lord of the Rings don’t look “fully realistic.” They look very high-contrast and painterly, with dramatic unreal shafts of light bursting through the clouds:
And again, this is by design:
“We wanted to nudge it sideways from reality. New Zealand is a lovely country but it’s still New Zealand, still a real country….and I wanted to nudge it slightly to Middle Earth, which is an ancient world….a world of myth, and legend.”
And the watercolor storybook-inspired colors and lighting isn’t just in the environments either. It was also used in very basic dialogue scenes, to make you really feel like the entire movie was taking place in a fantasy world:
Because the stylization in Lord of the Rings is so consistent– but not to so exaggerated that it gets distracting— it creates this beautifully unreal and dreamlike tone that is completely unlike any other movies I’ve ever seen.They really do end up feeling like “watercolor fairy tales” come to life.
This is solid.
I’d also add that yes, they pushed the look of the whole film into “unreal” territory, but they also were very selective and deliberate about where they used CG versus practical effects. Or practical everything, really. In every single possible instance that something could be shot using real elements, it is. The costumes and sets and props are nearly all real, the forced perspective shots are real. As often as possible hobbit actors are just on their knees or the other actors are on appleboxes or replaced with larger/smaller actors from behind instead of being digitally shrunken down or up. The sets were largely built by hand or on location, and the only greenscreen factors in once you get to the far distance. They built the frickin chainmail by hand, even.
Which is the OTHER reason that it holds up. Your eye knowns when you’re looking at a real thing, even if your brain can’t quite articulate why.
Which is why an image like this:
Or this:
Or this:
Which are all effects shots! Feel more real than this:
Or this:
Or this:
(This is honestly the main reason why I had trouble watching MCU films for so many years. It just don’t look real, guys. I can’t think of anything but how you’re shooting this in a studio somewhere.)
Marvel and LotR are using the same tools, including set extensions, CG, color grading, all of it, but Marvel tends to use CG and greenscreen on almost every element. LotR is real in every possible way that it can be.
Marvel films are stylized and made to look unreal just like LotR - but they also largely ARE unreal. LotR is mostly real but faked, and there’s a big difference between those things.
Like this image:
The boats, the water, the cliffs, the actors are real. And the statues were real too - just small models, probably smaller than a person, shot separately in similar lighting, then comped onto this shot to look thousands of times larger than they actually are. Then the whole image is graded and blended together so that the colors are seamless, the cliff edges are extended so that you can’t see the edges, add a little digital mist in the far background there to really sell it - and boom. Feels real.
Your gut knows when something is real - which is why it holds up when you rewatch it. No matter how advanced CG gets, and it’s pretty damn advanced at this point, it’s still little pixels on a screen. But real chainmail on a real person standing in a real forest with a little CG far in the back? Two actors of roughly the same size looking like they’re two different sizes just because of where they’re sitting? It feels real because it mostly is.
It’s not just color grading and blending, it’s knowing when and where and how to use things, and then actually taking the time (and the expense) to do it right even when most people won’t be able to tell - or, in a lot of cases, even care.
(CG and greenscreen is absolutely a practical solution in the sense that scheduling issues are hell the way that Marvel shoots things. LotR had the luxury of shooting for a year straight, Marvel has to piecemeal and they don’t always know who they’ll have when, so it’s cheaper to build sets and even costumes in post than it is to build them in preproduction. But it won’t hold up as well as the 20 year old LotR films have over time.)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is an amazing addition!!!
Yeah the reason LOTR’s visuals have held up so well is the combination of careful stylization AND using practical effects whenever possible.
As a result, the things that look unrealistic, look unrealistic on purpose. It’s wasn’t “the visual effects artists weren’t given enough time to finish the shots” (which was actually the case for Black Panther) it was “they were deliberately and carefully trying to get that very specific storybook-illustration effect.”
The end result is that the LOTR movies feel….. “hand-drawn?” Yes all CGI effects are ultimately created by hand, by skilled artists– but in LOTR you really feel the way everything was carefully hand-painted and hand-sculpted. The unrealistic elements of LOTR just feel like the artists are choosing to show their brushstrokes.
Making It Weirder - David Tennant at C2E2 discussing Good Omens
I think Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett… they have a very unique writing voice. I think that’s why they’re so beloved and that’s why they have such huge fan bases. I think if anyone else had tried to adapt Good Omens for the screen they would have made it normal. They’d have sort of knocked off the bananas edges. It would just have made sense to make it more linear and to reduce the number of characters and to take some of the weirder stuff out, because it’s hard to film. And Neil being Neil just went, “No we’re doing all of that, exactly as it is, and do you know what? We’re going to make it weirder”
:)
Well, yes.
Then again, writing Good Omens Season 2, we had to seriously look at what we were doing, given the constraints of making television, and what an international audience can accept, and the need not to be too weird, and then…. make it even weirder.
Good on you @neil-gaiman. A hearty dose of benign weirdness is exactly what the world needs right now!
this has nothing to do with anything, but when Good Omens came out, I had just had minor surgery, so I spent the whole weekend after it came out high off my tits on painkillers and watching it on repeat
and at one point my beloved spouse, so tired of hearing the theme song, started singing along with it:
oh i really like all my ooooranges but I really love my banana truly i like all my oooooranges but I really love my banana!
so reading ‘they would have knocked off the bananas edges’ was briefly VERY confusing to me because how could you take the bananas out of the Good Omens theme song? The bananas line is a classic! We’ve all been singing it for years!
right, Spider, to everyone else, the theme song to Good Omens contains zero lines about bananas.
You’ll hear it in your head the next time you hear the theme. Tell me you won’t.
Bonus:
Bonus 2:
Crowley’s favourite song is The Velvet Underground - I’ll Be Your Mirror.
well considering the linear nature of time and aging id love to hear the alternative
one of my grandparents’ kittens taking a nap inside a toy truck
Pick a bottle any bottle lol
I recently read an article about a therapy group for depressed people who had all attempted suicide at some point. The breakthrough question for them was, “If your goal was to be just as miserable as possible, what would you do?” Most of them listed things like not getting enough sleep, or isolating themselves from everyone… the list goes on, but the point is, they listed things they already do. But now they saw those “coping mechanisms” for what they really were: things that were actively making their condition worse.
I read that article at 2:00 AM, asked myself, am I TRYING to be miserable tomorrow? And it was easier than usual to put my phone down and fall asleep. Even my intrusive “lying down” thoughts about meaninglessness and existential dread were easier to suppress when I framed them as things I’d think about to purposefully make myself feel as awful as possible.
Fuck that is helpful
if you feel bad for no reason, that’s scary and frustrating. if you MAKE yourself feel bad, it’s okay, because you’re in control. except if you’re in control, maybe you should try to make yourself feel good, even if that’s scarier because it might not work.
scary and good is, actually, better for you long term than predictably bad.
“Memento Mori” book with skull carved in the thickness of old books
We stan!!!!
chaotic good
There’s a happy ending to, because the robbery was unsuccessful, the couple ended up getting the money Eden needed from a movie inspired by em! Also John only had to serve part of his sentence. Check out their wedding photos btw they’re beautiful.
reblogging because I’ve seen this post a thousand times and I’ve never seen the happy ending!!
Everyone go watch Dog Day Afternoon please please please it’s the movie mentioned in this thread it’s Sidney Lumet’s best imo and Al Pacino plays John and he is heartbreakingly good in it.
#ActionHero
#actual no irony this is exactly why IJ is an action hero: his legs wobble when he gets hit and he falls down #he gets tired and he looks tired #it still hurts days later and he’s tender about it #he cries a little bit #he’s not a Cool Action Guy because he always wins effortlessly in an impressive way #he’s that because of the leg-wobble and the fall down and the getting back up wincing #you never wanted a guy to Make the Jump so bad as you want indy to make the jump and catch a break
this tweet sends me into fucking hysterics once a day
making silly sounds doesn’t always have to serve a purpose and is sometimes done purely for whimsy’s sake