Prompt: Yuri Gagarin, Vladimir Komarov, Gherman Titov and Valery Bykovsky as tired Swedish tech startup entrepreneurs drinking beer in a pub in Lund, Sweden.
Pictures via Aitubo.
𓃗

No title available
sheepfilms
Keni
No title available
$LAYYYTER
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Sweet Seals For You, Always
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

ellievsbear
d e v o n
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

oozey mess
Mike Driver
Sade Olutola
Claire Keane
The Bright Sessions

Origami Around
The Bowery Presents
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Argentina
seen from France

seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from China

seen from Ecuador

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from Aruba

seen from Germany
seen from United States
@arionvulgaris
Prompt: Yuri Gagarin, Vladimir Komarov, Gherman Titov and Valery Bykovsky as tired Swedish tech startup entrepreneurs drinking beer in a pub in Lund, Sweden.
Pictures via Aitubo.
"The comic relief character was a cold-blooded villain all along" is a plot twist that is either brilliant or stupidest hackshit ever depending on how it's handled.
"hahah this ugly little freak was evil all along" for shock value? Boring.
"this entire time you have known me, you have been nothing but sadistic towards me. Are you telling me that this whole time, you've had no idea how badly I have wanted to kill you?" holy shit cinema.
You’ve heard of the Roaring 20s........
now get ready for the Screaming 20s - coming to a decade near you in 2020
is it too early or can we start screaming now
in retrospect perhaps we should have started sooner
this post is the equivalent of a newspaper from the day of the outbreak being blown past by the wind after you wake up in a post apocalyptic world
World Heritage Post
kind of harmonically beautiful
There's an open pit in the middle of our office plan that drops down into a bunch of very sharp spikes that kill you instantly. This is bad. People keep falling in there and dying. Someone put a sign up, the other day, all bright yellow so you can't miss it, that says "Beware!!! Spikes!!!"
The office immediately split into two factions over it. One says that if anyone falls in the spike pit it's their own fault for being so stupid and not watching where they're walking, so we should remove the sign. The other says that the sign is an insult, there shouldn't be a spike pit in our office at all, and having the sign up like that is just normalising the existence of the spike pit, so we should remove the sign.
We ended up removing the sign. Probably for the better. Still... for a while there it looked like it might have worked...
Nobody has ever been capable of writing a scathingly harsh and well formulated satire about the perils of modern capitalism, that doesn't just get immediately one-upped by some random food service worker talking about their actual week.
Not to stick my dick in the wasp nest here but I just walked past a white dude with the longest crustiest dreadlocks I have ever seen in my LIFE and if I do not exclaim my bafflement and horror *sonewhere* then I'm afraid I will lose control of myself and gently ask him Why
Like we've GONE OVER cultural appropriation for fucking decades now, that shouldn't be news to anyone, and anyone capable of a google search should be able to grasp that the "vikings" didn't ACTUALLY DO THAT
But even if you boil away the "I don't believe appropriation is a real thing" people and the "well hmm you weren't THERE" people and even the "it's not that deep and it looks cool" people, there should still be the irrefutable fact that STRAIGHT HAIR DOESN'T LOCK?
Boy out here has KNOTTED MATS that are nearly transparent blond at the roots and fucking BROWN the other 70%
Son that's DIRT
What the FUCK
Is anyone else starting to feel kind of wary about the increasingly common narrative that "women's bodies are so different to men's that modern scientific recommendations do not apply to them"?
Like. There is a significant gap between 'a lot of studies do not take into account variations caused by things like female hormone cycles, which can limit how generalisable they are' and 'medical science does not apply to women', and the latter just seems to create a situation rife for bad faith actors and snake oil salesmen to reassure you that actually, THEY have the answers, because THEY listen to women, and if you simply pay them for their online subscription service-
KICK THE CAN!
Let’s play the biggest game of kick the can on the internet.
To kick the can, reblog it. I wanna see how long this can go on for.
the oldest reblogs for this post that i can find are from january 2nd of 2013. this can has been getting kicked around tumblr for almost 13½ years now
And yet somehow this is my first time kicking it!
i was training a young person at work, and she referred to sexual assault as "SA" out loud, and i immediately was like, "no, it's sexual assault, call it what it is," bc idgaf if the algorithm overlords have taught y'all that you should fear direct language, how tf do any of you expect to ever address real issues with any amount of seriousness if you can't even say the words? imagine an advocate looking a sexual assault survivor in the eyes and asking "did he grape you?" it's absolutely fucking absurd, but these young interns and new hires are coming into an environment where we deal with survivors of all different kinds of abuse, and they're coming with the mindset that the words are as bad as the actions, and that makes them shitty at the job and look juvenile af
i HATE self-censorship for a lot of reasons, but being in crisis work makes it even more frustrating. who are you censoring for? like i am being so fr, WHO are you censoring for? have you even thought it through? people who have been raped know that they have been raped. if someone attempts suicide or is grieving someone who did, saying "sewer slide" isn't going to protect them from any of the feelings. a murder victim's family isn't going to feel better bc you said "unalived" instead of murdered. if anything, it's just extremely invalidating and othering. it's saying "what happened to you is so bad that i won't even say the word," which is NOT trauma-informed care. you are not protecting survivors/victims when you self-censor. the ONLY things you protect when you self-censor are the puritanical ideologies that are being encouraged by rich fascists who want your money and obedience
say the fucking words, guys. just say the goddamn words before i go insane!!!
An 1800s court room drama involving a printing press that has struck gold by making a deck of playing cards that features quite charming illustrations of local Dames Of An Occupation, in whatever outfit, state of (un)dress and pose they wished to be painted in. Some of them are remarkably creative - one of them is easily recognised despire of not having her face visible at all, because nobody else would be both flexible enough to achieve that position and shameless enough to pose in it.
The card deck company has been taken to court by a local self-appointed guardian of public morality, who insists that despite of no laws being broken in the creation of the deck, such lewdness should nonetheless be deemed illegal. He does not care that the models were paid well for their portraits and gave their full consent to their use, nor that they are in fact satisfied with getting free advertisement from them. He does not care about the rights nor consent of sex workers, he simply wants the cards gone.
The judge eventually deems that the cards are indeed too indecent for public sale and distribution, and the artist who designed the cards agrees to re-draw them according to the limitations dictated by the court (which sadly include prohibiting the aforementioned impressively flexible pose), on the grounds that no additional limitations are given retroactively.
It takes a year for a new card deck to be drawn and go into print, and it doesn't take long before the same people are in the courthouse again. This time the Defender Of Public Modesty is suing the card print company for personal slander, as every single drawing in the new art of the corrected deck features a man who looks unmistakably like himself, harrying and bothering the ladies of the previous deck portraits, whether by judging skirt lengths with a measuring tape, covering an exposed bosom with a folding fan, or placing a tablecloth over the infamously impressive no-knickers-hand-stand.
The Morality Warrior is enraged by this distribution of slanderous images of himself interacting with any women of questionable repute. The judge agrees that drawing an entire series of portraits of this guy harrassing these women does count as spreading false accusations of him, and agrees that the second deck should also be taken out of rotation. The artist who drew both decks consents to making a third version with the same conditions as before: no additional retroactive rules. No depictions of women in lewd poses, and no depictions of the man who sued them posing with sex workers.
The third deck is once again taken to court, as it depicts the exact same uncensored themes, outfits and poses as the first deck, except this time instead of the local Ladies Of Occupation, every card instead depicts the Public Morale Defender. The print company had to hire a trapeze artist from a passing circus to pose as reference for the most famous subject, as no other man could be found who could do a hand stand like that.
The judge agrees that these cards, also, are slanderous, and before the lawyer of the card print company can start negotiating for new conditions on what counts as "acceptable" replacement, the judge announces that they should just go back to making and selling the first deck they started with. And also if he ever has to see any of the people involved in his fucking court room again, over this same damn subject, he is sentencing everybody involved to death, by hanging, including himself.
worst part of being an adult is how often youre forced to nag. you Have to be annoying or youre never getting anything done. which is unfortunate considering how common it is to teach kids to never nag and be annoying ever
a professional i am paying money doesnt show up w zero communication and IM the one who has to feel guilty for having to call him and ask whats going on. because when i was a little kid i would get yelled at for nagging. joke world
In addition to this there is now a kind of culture of like "you don't owe anybody anything" and like "protect your peace" and whatever which means that a lot of people just straight up don't show up for shit. Now I'm the one that feels bad for inviting you at all bc surely that was the most annoying thing you've ever gone through
Canadian ice hockey player Brian Hayward, goalkeeper for the San Jose Sharks, on the ice during a game, early 1990s.
The coolest goalie mask of all time
i am 100% convinced that mobile phone/ social media bans for under 16s are an attempt to remove kids and teens from public life. this is not protecting kids this is locking them in houses with no escape from their abusers. the world is so hostile to teenagers rn