I'm about to be feral
macklin celebrini has autism
Phantogram Three

izzy's playlists!
Show & Tell
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
almost home
Keni
The Bright Sessions
The Bowery Presents
art blog(derogatory)
noise dept.
The Stonewall Inn
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

ellievsbear
No title available
Today's Document
Fai_Ryy
seen from Türkiye

seen from Italy
seen from Australia

seen from Canada
seen from Germany
seen from New Zealand
seen from Vietnam

seen from Italy

seen from Türkiye
seen from Argentina

seen from Singapore
seen from Ukraine

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Japan
seen from Ecuador

seen from Türkiye
@belles-magnetic-violin
I'm about to be feral
New around here? Things you missed in the first half of Sherlock fandom:
The Dark Fuck Prince (which led to the Top!lock/Bottom!lock Wars; few survived)
Tunalock, Faunlock, Merlock, Umbrellalock
Red Pants Monday
The Smol Softe (which was the rebound effect of the DFP; few survived)
John Watson’s Big Dick Walk[tm]
Mormor
Gridlock DC, 221B Con, Sherlock Seattle, Sherlocked
The Mystrade cosplayer who made a dapper suit out of goldfish-print fabric
That one night Sherlock tumblr got super horny (few survived)
A Finger Slip debacle (kickstarter! lots of cash! no result!)
What have I forgotten, Fandom Olds?
Intern Kevin, responsible for Moriarty’s shenanigans…lol
Richard Siken courting the fandom to sell his poetry books
The post-S4 tin hat sect (secret episodes! conspiracies! possible Russian shenanigans?!)
I left off TeeJayEllSee because I still have that-related PeeTeeEssDee.
Potato! John
omg I remember all these!
And realllly long metas
Rereading ‘PIALR’ during Oscar season
One word: Cinnamon
‘Fucking John’ prompts
The Purple Shirt of Sex
Character beds
I love hearing about fandom history.
This sounds like a “story so far” show intro… “last week on Sherlock fandom” except it was six? years ago.
consider:
that week when lsit posted nothing but johncroft and people went insane
anderson fucks dinosaurs
box of flowers fic
cumberbitch/cumbercollective/cumbercookie
fuck off jude law
The olden days 😂
are we all just going to ignore potato!john ??? anyone care to explain what the fuck that was about???
Potato!John costars in a collection of wonderful comics by @floccinaucinihilipilificationa
I may have hallucinated this one, but I seem to recall there being discussion about whether or not there would be a Sherlock/Doctor Who crossover (this was before I officially joined the hellsite, back when I lurked)
And finally...3. See you soon 😇😈
RELEASE DATE OF GOOD OMENS FINALE IS MAY 13 2026!!! 😍❤
October 24th
“He lay a little while longer looking at patches of sunlight on the wall, and listening to the sound of a waterfall. ‘Where am I, and what is the time?’ he said aloud to the ceiling. ‘In the House of Elrond, and it is ten o’clock in the morning,’ said a voice. ‘It is the morning of October the twenty-fourth, if you want to know.’ ‘Gandalf!’ cried Frodo, sitting up. There was the old wizard, sitting in a chair by the open window. ‘Yes,’ he said, ‘I am here. And you are lucky to be here, too, after all the absurd things you have done since you left home.’”
~J.R.R. Tolkien
Archbishop James Ussher claimed that the Heaven and the Earth were created on Sunday, the 21st of October, 4004 BC, at 9:00 a.m. This too was incorrect, by almost a quarter of an hour. It was created at 9:13 in the morning. Which was correct. The whole business with the fossilised dinosaur skeletons was a joke the palaeontologists haven’t seen yet.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY EARTH!!!
I gave up on Snippet Sunday
In 10 days we start posting Inferno.
Seeing 4 years of writing “bound up with love into one volume” is intense! I love the plot @7-percent’s wickedly inventive brain proposed, but it poses the question: What parts can we excerpt without spoilers?
A clash of the titans-style fight between John and Sherlock?
Um—make-up sex?
Sherlock’s best James Bond imitation on the A1 between Cassino and Naples?
The tiny sapphire jewel that is the Bay of Ieranto, in a private boat?
John accusing Sherlock of chasing his former, pre-family life?
Sherlock trying to make sense of his own passion for this risky case?
Roberto moved by professional and personal ambition equally?
Bologna, take 2: where did Sherlock’s pyjamas end up after John threw them into the canal?
It’s a puzzler. For now, we’ll just, say, put up this placeholder and say we’re having fun, asynchronously of course, and hope we've written something you’ll enjoy as much as we have.
*
Tags below the cut; grazie mille if you reblog this post, on tumblr or elsewhere! Let us know if you do (or don't) want to be tagged.
Of all the redemption arcs in popular fantasy media, I feel like Theoden's in The Lord of the Rings is the most overlooked.
The movies emphasize the magical control that the evil powers exercise over Theoden, but in the books, it's more obviously a depiction of bad kingship, in the British medieval sense. Theoden takes bad advice; he neglects his family; he fails to reward his knights; and he leaves his people vulnerable to attack. He also does not honor his kingdom's promises to help nearby kingdoms, as we can tell from Boromir's account of what Gondor has been going through.
Gandalf doesn't just cast out the curse and magically fix everything. He encourages Theoden to free himself from his bad advisor, but Theoden has to take all the subsequent steps. And those choices are not easy; after so much neglect, his knights are scattered, and his only option for defending his people is to gather them at Helm's Deep. The siege does not go well. His people are afraid and despairing. But nevertheless, he holds firm and charges out to meet the enemy -- and Gandalf literally meets him halfway, bringing with him the lost knights, whom Theoden welcomes and rewards after the battle.
Theoden could have just gone home after that. But when Gondor calls for aid, Theoden proves his worth by honoring his promises. He keeps his oaths not only to his people but to his allies.
And the climax of his redemption in the book is not his death, but his leadership. The ride of the Rohirrim against Sauron's armies is described in lavish detail, with an uncharacteristically heated pace: Theoden leads the entire line of Rohan, his banner streaming behind him in the wind as they race toward their foe. And that's the end of the chapter.
I love Theoden's arc so much, and especially that moment so much, because the message is not that he has to win battles or seek power. He just has to keep fighting. Theoden's greatest enemy isn't really Sauron: it's despair. And over the course of the book, he keeps choosing hope and action over despair and hesitation, until finally he can lead his people with courage.
As someone who struggles a lot with despair, I really needed to hear that story.
and it’s contrasted against Denethor’s arc; who also struggles against despair, and doesn’t overcome it.
yooooo. so I literally wrote a 20 page english paper about the Hope/Despair theme in Tolkien’s work once. It was like ten years ago and I don’t think I have it anymore, but oh boy do I have feeeeeeelings about this topic. And I have drunk a little bit of wine tonight! So here are my unasked for thoughts:
Yes, Theoden’s greatest enemy is despair! Everyone’s greatest enemy is despair. It’s the biggest fucking theme of the series IMO and it makes me crazy how often it gets overlooked.
lord of the rings is a story written by a man whose experience of war was crouching in the bottom of a trench. People like to make a lot of hay about the charge of the light brigade and it’s similarity to the ride of the rohirrim, but no. Tolkien’s experience of war was getting fucking trench fever, not watching cavalry charges. Tolkien’s experience of war was listening to the shells fall around him, knowing that death could come at any moment. He experienced war in a way where the soldiers on the other side of the line were a faceless threat, and the closest and most present enemy was his own fear.
this is the hill I will die on. This is why I hate it when people talk about LotR as a morally cowardly story about fighting mindless orcs that exist to be cannon fodder. No. Lord of the Rings is about seeing the dark coming on the horizon, and fighting yourself. Fighting the fear and despair that rise up inside you. Struggling with your own terror and powerlessness, knowing that you are small, and nothing you do will matter in the face of this massive conflict— you’re just here, one more meaningless soul to feed into the machine guns. Lord of the Rings is about taking a deep breath, and bracing yourself, and deciding that if nothing you do matters, all that matters is how you do it. The ring can’t possibly be destroyed— we choose to form a fellowship anyway. Helms deep will surely fall by morning— we still choose to fight. The quest can’t possibly succeed— and yet we choose to march into the teeth of mordor to distract the enemy. It’s not hope, exactly? But’s it’s not not hope.
I did at one point have twenty pages written about this. Tolkien was a deeply christian man— he believed in eucatastrophe. Salvation. A better world to come, after suffering, if you bore your suffering well. But he was also a world-class Beowulf scholar with a kinda viking-warrior-type view of the world. And do you know what the vikings believed? (Pls don’t anybody @ me for saying viking, I know it’s a verb and not a culture). The vikings believed that the time of your death was preordained, and that all you had control over was how you met it.
And that is some seriously Rohirric shit!! Like, we’re all mortals doomed to die, Ragnarok is coming, and this whole world is an inevitable grind down into oblivion… but if we’re fighting a long defeat, all the more reason to fight it gloriously!! That’s epic. Eomer approves the hell out of that message.
I’m gonna be a real nerd now, and quote from a poem called the Battle of Maldon.
“Courage shall grow keener, clearer our will,
More valiant our spirits, as our strength grows less.
Here lies our good lord, all leveled in dust
The man all marred. True kinsman will mourn
Who thinks to wend off from battle play now?
Though whitened by winters I will not away,
But lodge by my liege lord that favorite of men;
By my dear one and ring giver intend I to lie.”
That’s a translation from an Old English poem that’s literally a thousand years old, but it always gets me how much it sounds like something Tolkien would write. Theoden and Eowyn are practically leaping out of that poem: We’re all going to die, I choose to meet my end fiercely. We’re all going to die, so I want to die beside my king.
It’s an acceptance of death, and even of failure, but not of defeat. Because— to get back to what I was talking about earlier— Lord of the Rings isn’t actually a story about battlefields. It’s a story about being at war with your own heart. Despair or faith? Hope or defeat? Tolkien wants you to know that even if your city is overrun by orcs, or you’re killed in a meaningless push for another 50 feet of french mud, you can still hold on to your courage with both hands and not cede up your soul to despair-- and that’s the battle Tolkien thinks is really worth writing about.
It’s a battle that every major character in the story fights. Frodo, Sam, Gandalf, Theoden, Denethor, Merry, Pippin, Boromir, Galadriel, Eowyn, Faramir, Eomer, Saruman, Gollum, Aragorn. Some of them hold onto hope through everything. Some of them break utterly. Some of them are defeated, and then with help find their footing again, and make a redeeming last stand.
But the point that Tolkien hammers home again and again is: Death and failure are natural parts of life, and should be accepted. Despair shouldn’t be.
Tolkien says: hope is hard, actually. Fuck that Game of Thrones grimdark bullshit. Hope is hard fucking work. And even if you don’t have hope? Fight like you do. Because the world needs people working to make it better. Do the best you can with what you have, and whether you can see the mark you’re making on the world or not, the simple fact that you’re trying means the world is a better place.
Anyway, I fucking love these books. I am going to stop drinking wine, and go to bed now. :)
This is a phrase Tolkien used, by the way, “hope without guarantees”. A very good description of what his book offers. Despair is for people who know, beyond any doubt, what the future is going to be. Nobody’s in that position. So despair is not only a kind of sin, theologically, it’s also a simple mistake, because nobody actually knows. In that sense, there always is hope.
— Dr. Patrick Curry, “J. R. R. Tolkien: Creator of Middle Earth” (extra on The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring: The Appendices: Part One DVD)
I can’t find it right now, but there’s a post somewhere on here about the fact that there are two words for ‘hope’ in Sindarin Elvish: amdir, which means something like ‘expectation’ or ‘rational hope’ (literally ‘looking toward’), and estel, which means something more like ‘hope without guarantees,’ ‘faith,’ or simply ‘the absence of despair.’ Estel, of course, is one of Aragorn’s names.
I love this because THIS IS IT! THIS IS EVERYTHING!
and I want to highlight that quote from Dr. Curry (at least I think that’s it, because tumblr’s formatting is fuckéd), specifically the part that says “So despair is not only a kind of sin, theologically, it’s also a simple mistake, because nobody actually knows. In that sense, there always is hope.“
Because as pointed out above, Tolkien was a DEEPLY Christian guy, specifically a grumpy, unreconstructed pre-Vatican II Catholic. Which is the point that my professor made when I took a class on Tolkien. And specifically, she talked about how in that theology despair is a sin.
Despair is believing that your circumstances are so bad that God cannot overcome them. It’s saying that there is something more powerful in your life than God. Or at the very least that you know better than God what the end of these circumstances will be. And Catholic theology does not take kindly to that.
And while we can argue about that as a theological position all day long, you can see it EVERYWHERE in Tolkien, but maybe most clearly with Denethor, the other ruler with a bad advisor. The one who doesn’t listen to the people in his life counseling hope. He believes that his despair is the only true thing in the world, that there is no force that can overcome it. And Denethor’s despair costs him his life, and it nearly costs Faramir’s life and ruins the whole city’s chances at the battle.
So to put it all together, for Tolkien, death will come eventually, but we have a choice of how we face it when it arrives. The best way to face it is with hope and humility, and the fight to have hope is a hard one, but a worthwhile one. Because if you can hold on to hope in the face of impossible odds, if you can trust that there is a purpose you cannot see, then some good may still come of your acts. But if you give into despair, destruction is inevitable.
I'm reblogging this but not reading it all as I'm rereading the books for the first time in over 25 years and The Two Towers is probably the one I remember the least well, but I think you've put your finger on what didn't work for me with the films here. The most memorable things from the film are Wormtongue and the heroics at Helm's Deep. But Gandalf comes in like deus ex machina, not as something that coheres with Theoden's arc, because we haven't really got a handle of Theoden's arc. It's too much about Legolas surfing down stone steps on a shield and having bants with Gimli. And I loved Legolas and Gimli bants in the book, but the desperateness of the situation is completely lost in the desire to make it seem COOL.
I am liking this to read properly later when I've reread Two Towers, but thanks for this perspective that has made me excited to reread the book again, as it's reminded me that there's a lot the films have overwritten in my mind I would like to reclaim.
you’re not haunted by bbc sherlock
you miss it
OH GOD YES
that "OKAY SO" before someone u love starts infodumping........ most blessed feeling in the world
reblog to let your mutuals know that they can always give you the “OKAY SO” and you will listen
Let's play spot the difference, IMPOSSIBLE VERSION.
Can I please just point out that the shorter, blonde, polite worrier is on the left and the taller, dark-haired, clever, sarcastic, slightly traumatised is on the right and just staring at the other with complete puppy eyes
Bless the OP for making this set!
Three of my favorite ships all in one convenient, easy to carry post!
SIGH!
@thegildedbee
The Unforgettable Taste ... of Falling in Love by helloliriels ✨️ Reichenbach Chocolate 🍫
It’s not Amazon’s fault. It’s not the fandom’s fault and it’s not even the haters who asked for the cancellation’s fault.
It’s Neil Gaiman’s fault. End of discussion. He caused this, because he just couldn’t act like a normal human being and not assault women. He’s done this. And he’s too much of a coward to take the blame and to actually own up to his mess.
I’m so glad he’s out. And i’m glad we still have SOMETHING to look forward to. It’s doable in 90 minutes, guys, and the only reason we have that is because we fought for it. It’s no longer Neil Gaiman’s show. It’s ours.
LOUDER FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK
Merry Christmas!
To me, the scene in ASiB where John and Irene are talking about John and Sherlock's relationship basically makes Johnlock canon. "If anyone still cares, I'm not actually gay." "Well I am. And look at us both." To me that's Irene saying "Look at us both. In love with someone, despite our sexualities. In love with a man. In love with Sherlock." And John doesn't deny it. I can't be convinced that that isn't the case.
Good Omens 3
The third and final season of "Good Omens" will be just one episode and will move forward without Neil Gaiman, Variety has learned.
@fuckyeahgoodomens
God knows how long have I been laughing at this.
Боже мой 😂