Hello world i got really into trigun recently. this is my latest fanart that was originally intended to be a quick redraw of a trimax panel... wolfwood he is my favourite...🤤🤤 Enjoy
No title available
art blog(derogatory)
Game of Thrones Daily

blake kathryn
$LAYYYTER

ellievsbear

No title available
tumblr dot com

Product Placement
Noah Kahan
d e v o n
No title available
Monterey Bay Aquarium

No title available

if i look back, i am lost
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Cosmic Funnies
will byers stan first human second
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
seen from Brazil

seen from United Kingdom

seen from India

seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from India

seen from France
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Colombia

seen from Russia
@bionic-jaden
Hello world i got really into trigun recently. this is my latest fanart that was originally intended to be a quick redraw of a trimax panel... wolfwood he is my favourite...🤤🤤 Enjoy
(x)
Ok, everyone is talking about how pretty Pursuit of Jade is but can we take a moment to talk about how layered its visual storytelling is? Director Zeng Qingjie is doing a really good job using cinematography and mise-en-scène to establish the implicit class/power dynamics that will probably drive the romantic conflict between the main characters.
Despite their massive difference in status, Xie Zheng has found himself easily embedded in Fan Changyu's world. As @background-character-341 astutely describes:
"So so obsessed with the ways that Xie Zheng finds to insert himself within the already established dynamics of Fan Changyu's family and her life. It's the care and affection he shows for Changning...It's the interest he takes in her job, reassuring her that is doesn't scare or disgust him...It's the way the narrative constantly mirrors them, making Xie Zheng take his cues from her."
But not only has he inserted himself in her life, he's also anchored hers by providing a protective barrier that insulates her from and has mended the strained relationship she has with her neighbors. Hilariously, it's his good looks and pretty calligraphy--him as an individual--not his title and military prowess that does the job.
And we see that echoed in the evolution of the village's set design and actors' blocking.
Think back to earlier episodes whenever Granny Kang or Madam Song would harass Changyu and the neighbors would stay at the perimeter of the property observing but not seriously intervening. There was a literal barrier they never crossed because of her reputation. Now we see the adults (and all the children that originally would only peak in!) celebrating in the yard, the scene composed around him fulfilling husband duties.
And of course we can't ignore how the director frames and lights Changyu and Xie Zheng's scenes together.
The lighting is soft and warm, the frame often including the two of them plus Changning and her aunt and uncle. The use of medium and close-up shots for their relationship's camera language visually binds them together. They are a family unit--at least within the confines of Changyu's humble home.
The contrast with the capital is stark.
The immediate cut from Xie Zheng's lovely new year celebration with Changyu to the princess' at the palace made me laugh. Look at those moodier, colder colors and all the harsh leading lines, the composition placing a guard in the foreground. This is a completely different world for the elites, one that is calculating, high stakes, and promises violence.
It makes sense that Xie Zheng would do anything in his power to delay having to return to this because despite the respite Changyu's home provides he's fundamentally still one of them without her in the frame. When acting in his Marquis role, he too is filmed in darkness or shadow, the use of low-key lighting giving him a just as suspicious, ruthless air.
This is nothing like the drama's aforementioned visual language for Changyu--she doesn't belong in these scenes and therefore doesn't belong in Xie Zheng's world. There is no place for her kind, straightforward sincerity and the little community she cares for are pawns in the greater political environment.
Prediction: While he might resist because village life as a matrilocal scholar with his butcher wife was the one time he could escape the pain and violence of this world, I'm guessing she will be the one to sever their relationship once she learns of his real identity.
When they "break up", the drama's visual language will transform her beautifully lit scenes to something that more resembles his.
Zhang Linghe as Xie Zheng Pursuit of Jade 逐玉 · 2026
Get a guy who will handwrite a CVS receipt to shame your shitty ex in public
silence girls, mama is fighting (and could have killed us long ago but she has fed us and given us work we are truly blessed and didn't know, let's follow her to death)
it feels so weird to say this about a show where such a shit load of terrible things happen to them, but the writing of pursuit of jade really loves women.
our heroine, fan changyu, gets so many wonderful relationships across both genders, has such a developed and defined personality.
and small characters like the maid in qi min's manor make big impacts just by being kind to other women
then there are so many female side characters who are set up to be shallow antagonists but I think damn near every single one gets moments of dignity or bravery and as someone who's watched so many historical shows like this where they DON'T love women over the course of my life I'm just 🥹🥹🥹
((we don't talk about madam song ok))
Roasted Chestnuts
PURSUIT OF JADE (2026) | Ep 11
And THIS ladies and gentlemen is why directors matter. A four minute scene had more tension and intimacy than actual bed scenes.
I've already waxed on about how much I love Director Zeng Qingjie's work and his use of the "feminine gaze" so I won't repeat myself too much but dammit the way he portrays desire (especially women’s desire) and does so this skillfully with barely a word of dialogue is unmatched.
Just look at the cinematography:
It's the architectural framing of the curtains and the soft backlighting to emphasize the intimacy of the characters being "alone" as husband and wife for the first time. It's the gradual tightening of each shot to capture the characters' growing physical awareness of one another. It's the play of power with her more physically dominant in the frame while he guides her movements verbally. It's the impressionistic use of a handheld camera and the fluid rack focus on the eyes to mimic the intoxication of their almost-but-not-quite kiss.
And don't forget Zeng's strategic insert of a close-up:
Look at how the lighting reveals the texture of the clothes she's taking off him! And the blanket he hugs to bring her closer! And the goosebumps that appear on his skin when she washes him! All that suggestive wetness.
(Side Note: Hilariously, Tumblr marked those particular images of the blanket and goosebumps as needing a content label so I had to remove them.)
There's a certain haziness to the scene but where they touch is still in focus--there's sensuality in the tactile.
Director Zeng, please make at least 1-2 romance dramas a year and show these other directors how it's done.
Please and thank you.
Pursuit of Jade text posts part 1 <3
my complete collection of pursuit of jade textposts
See for yourself. This is my husband, the man lawfully married to me, Fan Chingyu.
PURSUIT OF JADE (2026) dir. Zeng Qing Jie
i do think what gets ignored about carrie as a character is that she’s an incredibly easy target to bully; she’s a chubby, sheltered acne ridden teenage girl who wears frumpy grandma clothes and regurgitates the jesus freak shit her violently abusive mother tells her. she has violent thoughts about her classmates and is uncomfortable to be around. she’s far more interesting being a victim that’s somewhat uncomfortable to be in the head of than a tragic waif. she’s not a martyr, she’s a child and a child who’s been victimised her whole life shouldn’t have to be kind and angelic to be recognised as a victim. suffering teenage girls shouldn’t just be presented on screen as toned down glamorous thin ophelias, suffering teenage girls can be fat and poor and think violently. i do think we need to examine why culturally we need teenage girls to be beautiful and kind to valorise their suffering and treat it as bad
adding onto this thought, i feel like this extends to how sue and especially chris are presented; chris is a deeply privileged cog in the machine that believes she’s allowed to punch down on people she views as less than human, as pigs but she also is a victim. depalma’s adaptation plays him as an idiot but billy within the novel frequently victimises chris, beats her, gropes her fantasies about killing her. a guy who’s significantly stronger than her is constantly harming her because he wants to and she can’t leave, she keeps telling herself she likes it. acknowledging carrie as an imperfect parental abuse victim should also come with acknowledging chris as an imperfect domestic violence victim. what makes sue (and tommy) stand out is that they aren’t victims of direct abuse, you can argue they’re victims of social hatred of children — them both being painted as more responsible for what happened to chamberlain than, say, the social services failing carrie — there’s a traditional ‘normalcy’ to both of them that contrasts carrie alongside billy and chris. carrie’s exploration of abuse as a text gets into how victims can be unlikeable! they can harm others! they can be uncomfortable to be around! it just doesn’t erase the fact that they are victims. suffering doesn’t turn you into an angel. carrie wasn’t a monster but she wasn’t a saint, i think that’s the power of carrie as a text; a blunt 200+ page statement about how victims are human first and foremost
source
flanagan isn’t the first but the deep urge to softening margaret and vindicate her is both misogyny and abuse apologia; people can not only not fathom the abusive mother as real, pretending margaret is an extreme caricature and saying she had a point in beating her child, saying her period was a divine punishment and locking her in a closet for hours until she pissed herself. theres a benevolent misogyny is assuming women are naturally maternal, thats they are wired that way especially in relation to their girl children. margaret doesn’t want to ‘protect’ carrie, not genuinely, its control and she treats jesus as a weapon against carrie. the more we keep trying to pinpoint margaret’s religious mania to actual reason, the more we expose how little we care about abused children.
what causes carrie to snap is the idea of her having to go back to her mother, to have to stay in that house for another second but she still wants her mother to love her because that’s what children want, to be loved. that doesn’t mean margaret genuinely cared for her, she loved carrie as an object to abuse not as child to love. denying your child knowledge of their body is abuse, calling your child a whore is abuse, isolating them from people is abuse, self harming in front of your child to control her is abuse. margaret deliberately keep her daughter naive so she could only rely on her. king writes an abused child’s relationship with their abusive parent with such sympathy for the child, it’s weird seeing adaptations fall into ‘the abusive parent had a point.’
to add, i find it frustrating how carrie isn’t allowed to be truly off putting like she was telling her classmates they were going to hell. margaret set her up to be ostracised, there’s an entire paragraph going into every incident that carrie was subjected to by her peers. she doesn’t have an innate trust in people or goodness, it’s why she freaks when tommy asks her to prom.
this is basic character shit. the inability for carrie to be allowed to exist beyond the book as an abuse victim with flaws, a child who is responding uncomfortably to her environment makes her a weaker character but also gets into how much we want girls to be perfect victim martyrs, carrie inherently challenges that. you’re kinda made to reckon with how much you’d probably be on chris’ side. she’s not an ideal victim, that’s a myth.
the production stills alone completely miss the importance of carrie’s clothes being frumpy and ragged like her having stockings that are about to run or her blouses being stained or her clothes literally falling apart. it’s so important in visually communicating carrie’s poverty and this? this doesn’t say shit. it says nothing. i loved the costume design for the long walk because those clothes felt lived in; garraty’s shirt has dye stains, you can see how run down the boys’ shoes are even before they start. it helps convey that these are boys stuck in poverty. these aren’t lived in clothes. i’ll have more concrete thoughts when i actually sit with this adaptation but it’s incredible how much flanagan is missing the mark here. this isn’t carietta n. white, man, it’s just not
And she's not fat, and not ugly. Because who could ever sympathize with a fat ugly girl?