Bridging the Gaps: A Portal for Curious Minds - “Free Will”
INTERVIEWS ARCHIVE ABOUT Alfred Mele is William H. and Lucyle T. Werkmeister's Professor of Philosophy at Florida State University. Mele is the director of the Philosophy and Science of Self-Control Project (2014-2017) and was the director of the Big Questions in Free Will Project (2010-2013).
Alfred Mele's first book, Irrationality (1987), sought to address philosophical questions surrounding two forms of irrational behaviour: self-deception and behaviour that manifests weakness of will. The second book, Springs of Action (1992), is about the role that beliefs, desires, and intentions play in generating human behaviour. The third book Autonomous Agents (1995) attempts to show that free or autonomous behaviour is a real phenomenon. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~uctytho/dfwVariousMele.html In the tenth book, Liberty: Why Science Didn't Overthrow Free Will (2014), Alfred Mele reached out to general readers. This book is on the same topic as my conversation. In the 13th book, Free Will: A Guide to Opinions, Alfred Mele reaches out to the general audience again, just as he did in Freedom. This time, instead of evaluating science-based arguments for free will scepticism, he focus on the main philosophical questions.
Does free will exist? This question has sparked debate among philosophers, psychologists, and theologians. A popular argument among neuroscientists and social psychologists is that free will is illusory—our words and actions do not come from rational choice, but from unconscious tendencies and social conditions. But according to philosopher Alfred Mele, the case against free will actually leave a lot of room for doubt. In Freedom: Why Science Doesn't Disprove Free Will, Mele examines the major experiments cited by free will deniers and explains how they don't provide the solid evidence they're touted. Instead, Mailer argues, conscious decisions play an important role in our lives, and that knowledge of situational influences allows people to respond rationally to those influences rather than blindly obey. Mailer's clear exploration of the meaning and consequences of free will, especially our moral and political decisions, make this an essential conversation in America. (GVSU,2015)
Feser(2015) posted that Mele demonstrates that scientific evidence is far from undermining free will, and the reasoning that leads some scientists to make other claims is sloppy.
Mele brings deep philosophical questions to life using compelling thought experiments. He tackles problems readers have already thought of, and some they will encounter for the first time, on topics including determinism, neuroscience, and control. After reading this book you will no longer think about free will or the decisions you think you are making in the same way.
I think awareness leads us to see the meaning of what we do, and the meaning of our decisions. Some decisions, such as where to study and who to befriend, involve a variety of judgments and feelings, as well as what choices mean to the lives of those who choose. The sense of meaning is again on the rise in moral decision-making. Free will is not in or of the physical universe, it is from the mental universe.
Reference:
Feser, E,. (2015) Why Science Hasn’t Disproved Free Will: A Review of Alfred Mele’s “Free”. [Online] Available at: https://strangenotions.com/why-science-hasnt-disproved-free-will-a-review-of-alfred-meles-free/. (Accessed 07 October 2022)
GVSU. (2015) Alfred Mele: American Conversations. [Online] Available at: https://www.gvsu.edu/hc/alfred-mele-american-conversations-54.htm. (Accessed 07 October 2022)












