blueflameswordsman

[blueflameswordsman]

[blueflameswordsman]

I always roll my eyes when these guys make comics where they have superheroes attack people for having an opinion they dont like rather then cause actual harm

or daring to enforce the law on criminals while pretending that enforcing the law and arresting illegal immigrants is fascism

[blueflameswordsman]

After Mar-a-Lago was raided, Andrew Weissmann claimed that the raid was proof that Trump had done something wrong. After John Bolton's house was raided, Weissmann claimed it was proof of Trump's political retribution. Democrats have so many professional liars on call.

[blueflameswordsman]

this is what they pretended George Floyd was

british media demands you ignore anti white racism

[blueflameswordsman]

Tony Gilroy ADMITS Star Wars Andor Was Political Propaganda At Peabody Award Speech!

[blueflameswordsman]

california elections are broken

[blueflameswordsman]

The Carroll case rested on a sequence of legal maneuvers with no precedent in American civil litigation. Democratic legislators passed a retroactive temporary law eliminating the statute of limitations for decades-old accusations that could not be dated, located, or defended with alibis. The day the temporary law took effect, Carroll filed her pre-prepared lawsuit, the first in the state to do so. A Democratic mega-donor secretly funded the plaintiff’s legal costs through a nonprofit. The arrangement stayed hidden until one of Trump’s lawyers discovered it. A Clinton-appointed judge then sealed all records so the jury never learned the billionaire backer had publicly committed to Trump’s political destruction. Every participant in the legislative, funding, and judicial steps operated inside the same political network, and each decision produced the same cumulative result. The jury explicitly checked “no” on the verdict form’s specific rape question. The judge ruled rape proven anyway, claiming the jury had used a common rather than statutory definition… an impossibility, since their rejection under the common definition precludes rape by any standard. Trump’s team was barred from arguing innocence before a second jury, which awarded $83.3 million ($65 million punitive) on the rape finding the first jury had rejected. A defendant was sued for defamation over denying an accusation, prevented from asserting that denial as a defense, tried before a judge who concealed the plaintiff’s political funding, and hit with a nine-figure verdict built on facts the jury itself refused to find. No comparable sequence exists in recorded U.S. civil litigation history.

The People of New York v. Donald J. Trump represents the most legally contorted criminal prosecution in the history of American presidential politics... a case constructed not from clear statutory violations but from a theory so novel, so layered, and so reliant on uncharged predicates that even legal scholars hostile to Trump struggled to defend its architecture. A Manhattan District Attorney, whose election campaign was bankrolled by a George Soros-backed PAC to the tune of over a million dollars, resurrected a two-year-old time-barred misdemeanor by attaching it to a federal campaign finance violation that the Department of Justice... under both the Trump and Biden administrations... had already examined and declined to charge. The Federal Election Commission, the body with exclusive jurisdiction over federal campaign finance law, never brought a case either. Bragg then used this federally rejected, never-charged theory as the elevating predicate to transform 34 bookkeeping entries into 34 felonies... without specifying in the indictment what the underlying crime actually was, leaving a jury to convict Trump of concealing crimes that were never proven, never charged, and never subjected to the standard of proof that conviction of those crimes would have legally required. The presiding judge, whose daughter ran a Democratic political consulting firm actively fundraising off Democratic clients... including Adam Schiff and Hakeem Jeffries... during the trial itself, declined every recusal request, and a New York ethics panel declined to intervene. Then came the sentence that rendered the entire edifice self-refuting. After convicting a former president on 34 felony counts... the first such conviction in American history, dominating every front page on earth... Judge Merchan sentenced Trump to an unconditional discharge... no prison, no fines, no probation, no conditions of any kind. If the falsification of business records across 34 counts was a serious enough crime to warrant the first felony conviction of a former American president... prosecuted under a legal theory no DA had ever used before, built on a federal violation the feds themselves refused to charge, elevated from a time-barred misdemeanor by a predicate crime never specified in the indictment... then it was serious enough to warrant punishment. If it was not serious enough to punish, then the 34 felony convictions were not about justice. They were about a headline. The conviction ran through the 2024 election cycle stamping "convicted felon" onto the Republican presidential nominee, and when that nominee won anyway and returned to the White House, the same judge who could find no grounds to recuse could find no punishment to impose... because the punishment had already been delivered, in the only courtroom that ever mattered... the daily news cycle, every day from May 30, 2024 to November 5, 2024.

[blueflameswordsman]

Turning a Jewish guy to a Nazi is not only super distasteful, but it misses the allegory Vogelbaum was a Jewish man whose work on superheroes was taken from him and corporatized, and as crude a parody of Stan Lee as he is, Old Legend makes it clear he also got screwed by Vought

The more I look into the original Boys comic, as mixed as they might be, I’ve come to realize that they seem to be less a commentary on superheroes, and more of a satire in the comic book industry cheapening and sanitizing superheroes into just being brands instead of characters.

this is what happened to the guys son

[blueflameswordsman]

"So like those messed up photos of Homelander murdering that family is pretty bad huh?" "Oh yeah gruesome stuff." "right..." "...." "Do...do you think "fail safe" could be compromised?" "woah woah I don't think "fail safe" is compromised. its programmed not to betray Vought and thats it." "Right. but humor me. what if "fail safe" went rogue to like dress up like Homelander and commit those horrible stuff in the photos. And in doing so wanted Homelander to go crazy so Vought would kill him." "....I wouldn't think about it." "But..." "I wouldn't think about it cause it'd put our department in trouble for making a defective assassin that would intentionally make its target go crazy so we could give it a kill order. would defeat the whole purpose of being a "fail safe." " "....oh" "I'm about to retire I don't need this."

To be honest, I don't really get this logic—like, they accounted for the fact that the almighty Homelander might lose his mind. And to control him, they made two almighty Homelanders who could also lose their minds? Wouldn't it have been simpler to just implant a bomb inside him? One that activates at the push of a button from Edgar?"

[blueflameswordsman]

🚨E Jean Carroll caught in deposition claiming she “totally forgot” billionaire Reid Hoffman was funding her entire lawsuit against Trump.

Just completely slipped her mind who was bankrolling the whole operation.

This entire case was a coordinated hoax from day one.

Common folks. That word “hoax” does not mean what you think it means. It was a conspiracy by leftist billionaires, democrat lawyers and all three branches of the state of New York’s government to persecute a political opponent. Total banana republic stuff.

Here's a clip of E. Jean Carroll in 1996 that according to her story and timeframe, would have been shortly after Trump allegedly assaulted her.

So Trump, one of if not the most famous people living in NYC at the time, went shopping in a department store, saw E. Jean Carroll there and decided to bring her into a dressing room and r*pe her. There were no employees around at the time (even though it was supposedly early evening when people had just gotten off of work and would be shopping) and throughout the alleged assault, this woman stayed quiet the entire time. And she stayed quiet after it happened. Yeah right.

Trump said that he didn't know who this woman was. Carroll's lawyers argued that he must have seen her on TV. So Trump (who purchased the Miss Universe pageant that same year), saw this person and had to have her so badly that he was willing to risk his freedom for it.👌

And her cats name is Vagina. 🤦🏻‍♀️

And NYC literally changed the law “temporarily” to allow charges brought in assault cases that had timed out.

She should be locked up with Jussie Smollett.

They both created assaults out of thin air.

The hatred they have caused is incalculable.

" I mean... it honestly cannot get more disgusting that this blatantly fraudulent case was allowed to move forward. This was an unprecedented political prosecution that permanently stained our judicial system. In September 2017, Carol Martin sent E. Jean Carroll an article mocking Trump… calling him "Orange Crush"… and pushed, "this has to stop." Then the line that matters... "as soon as we're both well enuf to scheme, we must both do our patriotic duty." Carroll's answer was instant. "TOTALLY!!! I have something special for you when we meet." Two women coordinating. A "scheme." A "patriotic duty." And an email Carroll never turned over in discovery until it surfaced anyway. On the stand, Carroll could not say what "something special" meant. Five years and she drew a blank. Martin filled the silence for her… a toy squirrel, she claimed, for a granddaughter. The jury was asked to believe the scheme was a stuffed animal.

The so-called "witness" who backed Carroll's outlandish claims in court? Well, emails from 2017 between her and Carroll expose the truth. In September of that year, Carol Martin sent E. Jean Carroll an article mocking Trump, referring to him as "Orange Crush," and urged, "this has to stop." She suggested, "as soon as we’re both well enough to scheme, we must both do our patriotic duty." Carroll eagerly replied, "TOTALLY!!! I have something special for you when we meet." Fast forward 15 months, and Carroll conveniently releases a book accusing Trump of assault. Martin didn’t want to be involved at first saying Carroll made the lawsuit a “lifestyle”.

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision. That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there. Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level. Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline. The case proceeded anyway. The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence. Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict. An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status. Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

" Lied about Reid Hoffman paying her legal expenses… Didn’t mention allegations in: 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Until 3 days after Trump announces re-election. Sick."

"The Carroll vs Trump case was set up by the Democrats by repealing the statute of limitations so Carroll could sue Trump. Dems did this only once - and it was vs Trump. Obviously, a political lawfare move. Moreover, Carroll said she could not remember the year her allegations vs Trump occurred, so Trump could not prove he was not at the time and place she alleged. Carroll also said she was regularly raped by seven different prominent men and claimed memory problems, so she might have confused one of them with Trump. She also exchanged emails with a friend before suing Trump, asking how they could "stop Trump." If all that does not require an investigation, then I cannot imagine what would."

America has the best justice system on Earth, but it can still fail massively. The lawsuit by E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump is a perfect example. Her story accusing him of an assault she can't place in a year based on a Law and Order episode she saw is absurd. But if you gather enough like-minded people who share a particular hatred or dislike, you can generate mob justice. It helps to have the media constantly demonizing the chosen villain to fully taint a jury pool. That and a pile of $$$ from Dem megadonor Reid Hoffman is how Donald Trump was falsely granted the title of "adjudicated rapist". Not convicted of the crime, but railroaded civilly and even though the jury tarring and feathering him refused to say he sexually assaulted her. The judge decided they should have and gave the desired result. It was an obvious set up from the second this unstable women was paraded out. They had tried everything to "Get Trump" and failed. But now this fabulist, and plagiarized from TV, tale was their win. I have no idea if she actually believes her story. But the people using her didn't care and so they walked her down the garden path. But now she has to account for some very obvious falsehoods in her testimony about certain aspects of the case. Good! This was a shameful miscarriage of justice and those involved should be held accountable for any legal wrongdoing.

"

"It's a false accusation and it's a disgrace. People have to be careful because they're playing with very dangerous territory and when they do that and it's happening more and more. When you look at what happened to Justice Kavanaugh and you look at what's happening to others, you can't do that for the sake of publicity."

Trump was 100% right. Democrats have mainstreamed false accusations as a political weapon, and countless innocent men have had their lives destroyed by extortion attempts and fabricated claims. Congress should convene a committee to investigate the thousands of men victimized since this became standard practice.

"

[blueflameswordsman]

His antagonists for 10 years have tried to illegally prevent him from being elected, then throw him out of office, then bankrupt his family, then throw him in jail, then prevent him from running again, and then prevent him from being elected again. And he's supposed to just wave off all of that simply because they failed??

[blueflameswordsman]

🚨 IT’S OFFICIAL: ABC News had to say it out loud.

“In the mid-2000s, Trump called police about Jeffrey Epstein.”

“Trump called and said, ‘thank goodness you’re stopping him!’”

For years, they pushed insinuations. For years, they hinted and smeared.

Now the record shows President Donald Trump flagged concerns and welcomed law enforcement action.

That’s not the behavior of someone protecting a predator. That’s the opposite.

Narrative shattered.

These people will not accept any ending where Trump's not the villain. TDS "Trumps" all logical conclusions. None of these people live reality. Instead, they make reality fit their narrative.

[blueflameswordsman]

This is such a good example of the hypocrisy and idiocy of the Left in regard to the First Amendment.

When Don Lemon met with Elon in 2024, he brought a few random "hateful" memes that he wanted censored from X. Lemon claimed that there is a clear line between right and wrong and that those memes should be removed from X for being offensive.

Fast forward to when Kimmel was off the air for three days in 2025. Lemon called it fascism and questioned who is to judge which jokes are right and which are wrong.

The Left will always try to censor its opponents while at the same time claiming they should be allowed to say whatever they want, no matter how hateful it is.

[blueflameswordsman]

"

The solution to all this chaos and violence, as Asmongold would say all the time… is to "Put them in the box".

Sending them to prison is too good for these agents of chaos. They need to be sent to labor camps to do hard labor and earn back the revenue and then some for all the money we waste managing these adult toddlers throwing a tantrum, causing mayhem.

Engineered anarcho tyranny is really by design. It creates a perpetual state of anxiety for law-abiding citizens as crime and disorder become an epidemic. This makes it easier for the state to control the populace, as it's harder to organize when you are worried about your own safety.

This allows the state to continue to encroach on regular rights with overregulation, taxes, and rules that punish the working class, such that the state can perpetually maintain power. It's easy to paint all of this as an emergent failure from woke ideologies and incentives, but the cruelty they have shown to regular citizens over the years makes it seem implausible.

It is, in essence, state-sponsored terrorism by siccing these criminals against the innocents, keeping everyone in a perpetual state of fear.

"

[blueflameswordsman]

The thing about Comic Homelander, along with some of the better takes on the “Evil Superman” trope, is that at their core they all have a similar message; “Superman being evil is stupid.”

[blueflameswordsman]

[blueflameswordsman]

It feels like Biblical Vindication to have to sat through people shitting on the comics and glazing the show for years, and now that it's over, the Comics are now being properly enjoyed by everyone and the show is regarded as garbage.

God may actually have a plan. Quote valery ☆ ⋆˚꩜｡ · May 25 Maybe I’m just not remembering, but I do wish the show had more of starlight and homelander being pissy about vought together. Well it’s mostly homelander here but wtv I still enjoy it

Yes. but also one of the constants in homelander in comics. is he respects when people stand up for themselves

That's the sad thing about comic Homelander. There's a nugget of a decent man in there. The corporate fuckery and irresponsibility warped him in a way that wasn't inevitable.

He was such a non-issue that it drove Black Noir insane. Imagine being told "Hey, your ultimate goal is to kill him when he gets out of control" and his biggest crime is being a fuckboy and a twat. Stillwell was more right then he realized when he called him average.

The show writers completely forgot the whole original premise was to take down vought not just Homelander

The show writers completely forgot the whole original premise was to take down vought not just Homelander