Politics & science
I didn't think that I would be writing a political commentary on my blog. But I've been getting a little frustrated lately. And I can't talk with some colleagues who are furloughed, much worse than my complaints, to resolve some questions.
In the political landscape today, personal experience trumps both expert opinion and data. Anyone heard of the scientific process?
Example A. Tea-partiers in the US House who disagree with expert opinion on whether hitting the debt ceiling would be a bad thing. (Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/ted-yoho-on-the-debt-ceiling-2013-10#ixzz2hVcg3ORL )
Personal experience trumps expert opinion.
Example B. Climate change. "This winter was very cold with lots of snow. Climate change can't be happening."
Unfortunately, weather (short-term trends) isn't the same as climate (long-term trends). Expert opinion and data (oh wait, I can't open the NCDC website because the federal government is shut down) show some different trends.
National Center for Atmospheric Research : https://www2.ucar.edu/climate/faq/how-much-has-global-temperature-risen-last-100-years
EPA: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/weather-climate/temperature.html
And a new study, as reported by CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/10/us/climate-change-study/












