I like how all of y’all keep sharing the Hbomb post but leave out the context of what he was referencing.
He wasn’t pedo-jacketing shit, that was literally what she said.
It’s not transphobia to not want to associate with someone who posts weird shit like this DAILY.
it's also transphobic to insist that all trans people need to "stick together" with pedophiles and that if we don't support pedophiles, we're "transphobic", thus broadcasting to every TERF and Conservative in earshot that "All Trans People Support Pedophiles", directly feeding into their fucking transphobic conspiracy theories !
He wasn't pedo-jacketing shit, he just *proceeds to give a description of pedo-jacketing." Anyway, you're more than welcome to go hang with your precious TERF buddies if you think pedojacketing trans CSA survivors is alright, since you value their approval so much.
He didn't though? He didn't call her a pedophile, which is a pretty big part of pedojacketing. He said she was defending lolicon, which she was.
"He didn't call her a pedophile! He just accused her of doing something that his audience believes is pedophilic and will stalk and dogpile her over!" You aren't clever, you know what you are doing. This is the exact logic that is used to defend outting someone as queer in an anti-lgbt family. You are an abuser, and you should consider not wearing a seat belt when you go on a roller coaster.
”He just accused her—“
He quoted her directly. He didn’t accuse her of shit, that is exactly what she said.
And no, “defending lolicon on your public platform” is not similar to “confiding your gender/sexual identity to a friend.” Vague-posting about something out-of-pocket someone else said on their own public social media account is not “outing” someone. Jesus fucking Christ.

















