Godlike Power Does Not Mean Holy Intentions
In the first few minutes of watching Akira, the dystopian setting made me think I was about to watch a film about anarchy, especially after finding out that Akira had accidentally exploded Tokyo from his abilities developed in a governmental project, which inevitability led to WW III. As with most other viewings in this class, my first judgment was far from the truth. I was not expecting how quiet the film would be beneath the destruction. While it has aspects of your typical war film, like riots and military services patrolling the city, the main message here is not warfare; instead, it is centralized on power and the fear of isolation.
Tetsuo's collapse hit me hardest. There's this kid, overlooked, mocked, always stuck in Kaneda's shadow, and when he finally finds a sense of authority, it destroys him. Not because he's evil or inherently defective but because no one ever taught him how to use anything other than anger. Essentially, giving godlike power to a human doesn't make them act with godlike intentions.
On the other hand, Kaneda is loudmouthed and irresponsible in all the ways Tetsuo can't be. But even he evolves. You see it in how he keeps on running towards Tetsuo, a friend he can't even recognize anymore, not giving up even when it's obvious that nobody's going out of this intact. Their friendship was a reminder of how friendships evolve, and how sometimes, rather than progressing, friendships can be destructively erosive when fear and pride get in the way.
Their world is dirty, clustered with smog, and decaying but still recognizable. This post-war Tokyo represents our world today: littered with institutionalized skepticism while young generations are trying to do the ever-ending destructive issues that they aren't responsible for. In my opinion, this entire film is just a way of illustrating the debate on the morality of the use of nuclear weapons by using psychological powers as an analogy for nuclear destruction.










